PPRuNe Forums - Search Results
PPRuNe Forums

Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Search Forums
Reload this Page >

Search Results

Register
FAQ
Calendar
Wikiposts
Today's Posts
Search
Vendor Directory
Search: Posts Made By: FlightPathOBN
Showing results 1 to 11 of 11
Search took 0.00 seconds.
Forum: ATC Issues
22nd Dec 2012, 18:39
Replies: 49
Views: 15,690
Posted By FlightPathOBN

To put that number in 210 for LHR in context, for...

To put that number in 210 for LHR in context, for the same year,
there were 50 reported wake encounters for all of the airports in the United States.



Yes, and RECAT is the result.
Forum: ATC Issues
22nd Dec 2012, 16:48
Replies: 49
Views: 15,690
Posted By FlightPathOBN

it is called minimum separation distance,...

it is called minimum separation distance, correct?

As far as safety, that is relative. LHR does appear to have quite the distinction on wake encounters.
In 2010, 65% of the reported wake...
Forum: ATC Issues
22nd Dec 2012, 00:06
Replies: 49
Views: 15,690
Posted By FlightPathOBN

del prado, The post, was directly from the...

del prado,

The post, was directly from the document by Paul Johnston, Application of wake turbulence at London Heathrow, read the document link...
...
Forum: ATC Issues
21st Dec 2012, 18:44
Replies: 49
Views: 15,690
Posted By FlightPathOBN

http://sondeiaviation.com/wordpress/wp-content/upl...

http://sondeiaviation.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/SC-13-e1356118895729.jpg

Application of Wake Turbulence Separation at London Heathrow...
Forum: ATC Issues
21st Dec 2012, 16:04
Replies: 49
Views: 15,690
Posted By FlightPathOBN

del prado, The reason for citing FAA RECAT is...

del prado,
The reason for citing FAA RECAT is that ICAO asked EUROCONTROL and the FAA to re-categorise aircraft and develop new wake turbulence separation standards.

What you are seeing is the...
Forum: ATC Issues
20th Dec 2012, 20:51
Replies: 49
Views: 15,690
Posted By FlightPathOBN

I guess there are two issues here (at least) ...

I guess there are two issues here (at least)

First off, this IS the FAA RECAT program, Recategorization of wake turbulence separation... not MRS or other separation, but specifically wake...
Forum: ATC Issues
20th Dec 2012, 19:23
Replies: 49
Views: 15,690
Posted By FlightPathOBN

This is not 'my' graphic, but from the FAA RECAT...

This is not 'my' graphic, but from the FAA RECAT program currently being used.

If you look at the diagram, there is an asterisk...at the lower left, the asterisk is explained. With the FAA, 2.5nm...
Forum: ATC Issues
20th Dec 2012, 16:47
Replies: 49
Views: 15,690
Posted By FlightPathOBN

Sorry, but in the FAA world that is exactly what...

Sorry, but in the FAA world that is exactly what it means.

IF the runway has a 2.5nm MRS, then the min wake is 2.5nm, IF the runway has a 3nm MRS, then the min wake is 3nm. I just went through...
Forum: ATC Issues
19th Dec 2012, 20:11
Replies: 49
Views: 15,690
Posted By FlightPathOBN

I am certainly not following this rational on...

I am certainly not following this rational on wake separation...Perhaps some views on the thought or approved process.



The ICAO wake tables are based on a minimum of MRS between many and...
Forum: ATC Issues
14th Dec 2012, 16:37
Replies: 49
Views: 15,690
Posted By FlightPathOBN

Thanks...forgot that you guys are allowed visual...

Thanks...forgot that you guys are allowed visual below MRS..

Here is the FAA version...(very confusing reversing CAT..)
...
Forum: ATC Issues
13th Dec 2012, 20:58
Replies: 49
Views: 15,690
Posted By FlightPathOBN

From what I understand, the spacing is based on a...

From what I understand, the spacing is based on a minimum measure crossing threshold...



Curious how you get less than 2.5nm sep, with wake turbulence issues?
Showing results 1 to 11 of 11


 
Forum Jump

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.