PPRuNe Forums - Search Results
PPRuNe Forums

Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Search Forums
Reload this Page >

Search Results

Register
FAQ
Calendar
Wikiposts
Today's Posts
Search
Vendor Directory
Search: Posts Made By: FlightPathOBN
Showing results 1 to 32 of 32
Search took 0.00 seconds.
Forum: Tech Log
22nd Aug 2012, 18:42
Replies: 94
Views: 39,694
Posted By FlightPathOBN

Meeting the criteria and flyability have only so...

Meeting the criteria and flyability have only so much to do with ATC operations.

While the ac may perform just fine, the procedure in itself is worthless if ATC cannot manage it.

As an example,...
Forum: Tech Log
22nd Aug 2012, 16:59
Replies: 94
Views: 39,694
Posted By FlightPathOBN

Procedures are not difficult to design, but...

Procedures are not difficult to design, but procedures that actually work are.

That is why there are such the issues with ATC, RNP with multi-variants was never envisioned in the criteria, as it...
Forum: Tech Log
20th Aug 2012, 20:06
Replies: 94
Views: 39,694
Posted By FlightPathOBN

OK, I see what you are saying, and yes,...

OK,

I see what you are saying, and yes, depending on the ac, and software version, there can be these issues, but these issues can be very variant/box specific, not simply Boeing or Airbus.
...
Forum: Tech Log
20th Aug 2012, 18:14
Replies: 94
Views: 39,694
Posted By FlightPathOBN

How did you come to that conclusion? There...

How did you come to that conclusion?

There are hundreds of procedures with speed restrictions on waypoints.

I have several approach procedures with a waypoint at FL10, with a speed restriction...
Forum: Tech Log
24th Jul 2012, 00:02
Replies: 94
Views: 39,694
Posted By FlightPathOBN

54A? what is that approved for? I am an...

54A?

what is that approved for?

I am an ops guy and design what works, not what any formula based criteria conjures up.

If you mean the FAF, that is also incorrect. There are several methods...
Forum: Tech Log
23rd Jul 2012, 14:52
Replies: 94
Views: 39,694
Posted By FlightPathOBN

terspter, Completely agree... the FAA went...

terspter,

Completely agree...
the FAA went for quantity, not quality.

The concept and reliance on idle descent as a selling tool, alleged fuel and track mile savings was a big mistake, when...
Forum: Tech Log
22nd Jul 2012, 22:35
Replies: 94
Views: 39,694
Posted By FlightPathOBN

DH, Well good luck! At least you no know more...

DH,
Well good luck! At least you no know more about RNP procedure design than you ever hoped for Keep us informed on what happens, of course now we all want to know!



If you had approval, you...
Forum: Tech Log
21st Jul 2012, 19:05
Replies: 94
Views: 39,694
Posted By FlightPathOBN

The procedures that you see in that presentation,...

The procedures that you see in that presentation, I have designed, provided the obstacle and flight validation, as well as trained the crew in SIM and flight val.

There is always one in the class...
Forum: Tech Log
21st Jul 2012, 14:44
Replies: 94
Views: 39,694
Posted By FlightPathOBN

http://operationsbasednavigation.com/wordpress/wp-...

http://operationsbasednavigation.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/SC-16-e1342881588842.jpg

You are taking this table out of context.
For this presentation they are referencing Approach...
Forum: Tech Log
19th Jul 2012, 23:18
Replies: 94
Views: 39,694
Posted By FlightPathOBN

The flavor of the regs makes the assumption that...

The flavor of the regs makes the assumption that the procedure may have been changed in the aircraft database by another pilot.

There are 2 main reasons why there all of the verbiage on...
Forum: Tech Log
19th Jul 2012, 17:20
Replies: 94
Views: 39,694
Posted By FlightPathOBN

sounds good terpster, I would also add that...

sounds good terpster,

I would also add that currently, the public RNP design criteria does not address DEP. It will be included in 8260.PBN, whenever that may happen...RNP 1 DP Specials...
Forum: Tech Log
19th Jul 2012, 14:55
Replies: 94
Views: 39,694
Posted By FlightPathOBN

please provide a link to the reference document...

please provide a link to the reference document you are talking about.

From doc 9905 RNP procedure design manual

2.1.1 RNP APCH versus RNP AR APCH
2.1.1.1 RNP APCH is defined as an RNP...
Forum: Tech Log
17th Jul 2012, 18:16
Replies: 94
Views: 39,694
Posted By FlightPathOBN

I understand, but that is what were were told by...

I understand, but that is what were were told by the FAA, it must have been just for the custom RNP AR...
...
Forum: Tech Log
17th Jul 2012, 02:24
Replies: 94
Views: 39,694
Posted By FlightPathOBN

Were you able to read, and well comprehend the...

Were you able to read, and well comprehend the post? http://www.pprune.org/7298826-post59.html which detailed the regulations?

I see that you are testing the old adage,

You have proven there...
Forum: Tech Log
16th Jul 2012, 16:29
Replies: 94
Views: 39,694
Posted By FlightPathOBN

terpster, 2 different question with relative...

terpster,

2 different question with relative answers.

9.G,

When you fly a DME arc, you are staying a certain distance away from the DME correct? So the DME is a radial point per se.
With an...
Forum: Tech Log
16th Jul 2012, 01:48
Replies: 94
Views: 39,694
Posted By FlightPathOBN

When I was originally speaking about the criteria...

When I was originally speaking about the criteria of FAA vs ICAO, I was referencing the criteria to become RNP and RNP AR certified, not design ctiteria...

Section 1a is the 50' momentary...
Forum: Tech Log
15th Jul 2012, 20:29
Replies: 94
Views: 39,694
Posted By FlightPathOBN

ICAO uses 9905 which is virtually the same for...

ICAO uses 9905 which is virtually the same for the approach design, but different in that it has a level section (SOC) for the missed approach surface, 8260.52 does not......
Forum: Tech Log
14th Jul 2012, 22:22
Replies: 94
Views: 39,694
Posted By FlightPathOBN

far be it that the driver, should dismiss any...

far be it that the driver, should dismiss any concepts of how the road was designed..



with your questions and reasoning, I certainly hope that you are not either...

a professional driver...
Forum: Tech Log
14th Jul 2012, 20:27
Replies: 94
Views: 39,694
Posted By FlightPathOBN

You obviously don't know anything about ICAO or...

You obviously don't know anything about ICAO or the FAA....

The information provided on the HK "plate" was so ambiguous, that experienced designers question the design and the 'aircraft'...
Forum: Tech Log
14th Jul 2012, 19:21
Replies: 94
Views: 39,694
Posted By FlightPathOBN

OK, thanks for the information...not sure...

OK,
thanks for the information...not sure about the RF turns, going from RNAV to VNAV transition...

Yes, it does something, unfortunately, every ones box does something, and not the same. @ of...
Forum: Tech Log
14th Jul 2012, 15:03
Replies: 94
Views: 39,694
Posted By FlightPathOBN

The HK departure simply mentions "aircraft with...

The HK departure simply mentions "aircraft with appropriate approval' in the text...

My answer with regards to HK is I do not know what they accept. The ICAO criteria is different than the US.
As...
Forum: Tech Log
14th Jul 2012, 03:19
Replies: 94
Views: 39,694
Posted By FlightPathOBN

You would have to read through the HK A19-11...

You would have to read through the HK A19-11 Supplement to see the requirements.

As I alluded to before this meets the def of an AR procedure, what HK whats from that is what they want, each...
Forum: Tech Log
14th Jul 2012, 02:32
Replies: 94
Views: 39,694
Posted By FlightPathOBN

9.G, Are you dyslexic or something? The...

9.G,

Are you dyslexic or something? The Airbus doc is Getting to grips with RNP AR... NOT RNAV AR...fix it!

BTW, when you are reading that document, the design plates, you are speaking with...
Forum: Tech Log
13th Jul 2012, 23:33
Replies: 94
Views: 39,694
Posted By FlightPathOBN

That is correct, they may not, but if there is a...

That is correct, they may not, but if there is a coded RF leg, it is AR.

I was also talking about RNP APCH, not RNAV APCH...

While the FAA doesnt call it APCH, in reality that is what these...
Forum: Tech Log
13th Jul 2012, 19:48
Replies: 94
Views: 39,694
Posted By FlightPathOBN

That is not correct. RNP AR has RF legs,...

That is not correct.

RNP AR has RF legs, RNP APCH has TF/TF with turns, RNAV straight legs with turns.

RNAV AR...hmmmmm.

Unfortunately, there is much of the information in the text...
Forum: Tech Log
13th Jul 2012, 03:19
Replies: 94
Views: 39,694
Posted By FlightPathOBN

Given the performance parameters of departure,...

Given the performance parameters of departure, currently, RNP-AR departures must be individually designed... there is no public criteria that includes a coded RF turn...

if you look into it, the...
Forum: Tech Log
12th Jul 2012, 21:47
Replies: 94
Views: 39,694
Posted By FlightPathOBN

The discussion is not about P-RNAV, it is about...

The discussion is not about P-RNAV, it is about RNP-AR...

The difference, among other things, is coded turns...

There are many recommended functions, virtually none of which have been...
Forum: Tech Log
12th Jul 2012, 17:15
Replies: 94
Views: 39,694
Posted By FlightPathOBN

9.G, RNAV RNP, not RNP AR.... Currently...

9.G,

RNAV RNP, not RNP AR....

Currently the criteria only addresses vertical on approach, it does not address vertical for departure, nor any RF turns.

8168 is TF to TF design, (which is...
Forum: Tech Log
12th Jul 2012, 00:35
Replies: 94
Views: 39,694
Posted By FlightPathOBN

Naverus did custom RNP departures?!?!?! ...

Naverus did custom RNP departures?!?!?!

Who'd 'ave thought.....

Aside from that, the point was that there is NO criteria for Public RNP departures, therefore, this is not a public procedure for...
Forum: Tech Log
11th Jul 2012, 16:36
Replies: 94
Views: 39,694
Posted By FlightPathOBN

There is certainly much room for improvement on...

There is certainly much room for improvement on the part of the regulator for this procedure. Certainly not a standard plate or terminology, leading to the confusion. Some of the waypoint altitude...
Forum: Tech Log
11th Jul 2012, 00:20
Replies: 94
Views: 39,694
Posted By FlightPathOBN

I believe the answer to your question is no. This...

I believe the answer to your question is no. This procedure would have to be in your navdatabase, and since it actually does have an RF turn, the ac would have to have the the required equipage and...
Forum: Tech Log
10th Jul 2012, 18:42
Replies: 94
Views: 39,694
Posted By FlightPathOBN

http://operationsbasednavigation.com/wordpress/wp-...

http://operationsbasednavigation.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/SC-09.jpg

http://operationsbasednavigation.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/SC-10-e1341945005553.jpg

There is a...
Showing results 1 to 32 of 32


 
Forum Jump

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.