PPRuNe Forums - Search Results
PPRuNe Forums

Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Search Forums
Reload this Page >

Search Results

Register
FAQ
Calendar
Wikiposts
Today's Posts
Search
Vendor Directory
Search: Posts Made By: NoJoke
Showing results 1 to 18 of 18
Search took 0.00 seconds.
Forum: Tech Log
27th Feb 2008, 16:07
Replies: 72
Views: 20,315
Posted By NoJoke

LFTR

Sorry to hear about the unsympathetic prats you 'work' with. I agree with loljoe, a gentle tap can work much more effectively than a total work over. I am afraid to say that a lot of 'so called'...
Forum: Tech Log
20th Feb 2008, 18:07
Replies: 72
Views: 20,315
Posted By NoJoke

Check

:ugh: Blessed relief I found it. ;)
Forum: Tech Log
20th Feb 2008, 18:04
Replies: 72
Views: 20,315
Posted By NoJoke

roljoe

Sure enough I looked up the link you kindly supplied. Again we come down to the same old problem. It is allowed to factor the Vis to RVR but the place I was at does not have RVR specified on the...
Forum: Tech Log
20th Feb 2008, 13:56
Replies: 72
Views: 20,315
Posted By NoJoke

"Visual"

DFC. I am sure you are not doubting me with your 'If' but I assure you the Vis was at between 8 - 10 km. The trouble is that one important part of the and/or gate was missing.

If you were visual...
Forum: Tech Log
18th Feb 2008, 12:40
Replies: 72
Views: 20,315
Posted By NoJoke

Oh my

DFC. I understand your point of view, and due to the extensive discussion we all have had; I think I understand the Regs. However I still ask that if cleared for the approach by ATC AFTER declaring...
Forum: Tech Log
17th Feb 2008, 06:35
Replies: 72
Views: 20,315
Posted By NoJoke

Visual

So my point is. I called Visual before the approach ban point. Tower then cleared me for the approach (then a visual approach) although tacit, it was still a clearance. Y/N. My assessment of the Vis...
Forum: Tech Log
14th Feb 2008, 20:37
Replies: 72
Views: 20,315
Posted By NoJoke

Checkboard

Thanks for joining the confab. I don't have JAR-OPS docs available, so while we are JAR-OPS compliant we are not JAR OPS approved, hence certain convenient differences I think. You couldn't cut and...
Forum: Tech Log
12th Feb 2008, 05:16
Replies: 72
Views: 20,315
Posted By NoJoke

Ten

Some do, some don't because they don't operate to under the same regulatory authority. For example a mate of mine is an Australian, apparently over there the approach ban does not exist in the same...
Forum: Tech Log
11th Feb 2008, 15:39
Replies: 72
Views: 20,315
Posted By NoJoke

Ten

I'm just saying that the difference between Jersey (I did my PPL there in 1979 and now 12,500 hrs later ..) and the other side of the Middle East are vastly different. As I tried to say there was no...
Forum: Tech Log
11th Feb 2008, 11:21
Replies: 72
Views: 20,315
Posted By NoJoke

TenAndie

I have operated in the UK for years but I am now overseas. I am aware of RVR, fog, slant visibility etc. The weather conditions preclude any form of fog. I could see for miles - literally! Completed...
Forum: Tech Log
6th Feb 2008, 10:09
Replies: 72
Views: 20,315
Posted By NoJoke

Get-in-itis

Not the case in this one. We had plenty of fuel and had a 'decent' alternate planned. We were visual before the approach ban point. The tower had not changed the weather and shortly after we landed...
Forum: Tech Log
3rd Feb 2008, 01:30
Replies: 72
Views: 20,315
Posted By NoJoke

Reported or as seen by pilot

I actually had around 8 km Vis, but the tower (the ATIS) was still giving 1000 m. In hindsight I should have called for an update but having observed the actual Vis I continued, thinking I was legal.
Forum: Tech Log
28th Jan 2008, 03:03
Replies: 72
Views: 20,315
Posted By NoJoke

Mr Jockey

Thanks. The point I am trying to make, or perhaps clarify is that prior to reaching the approach ban point I called visual to ATC. They then cleared me for the approach, however they did not actually...
Forum: Tech Log
26th Jan 2008, 06:01
Replies: 72
Views: 20,315
Posted By NoJoke

YAD

The weather report was around 30 mins old. The point being is that before I was in a situation where I could see the airport before the approach ban point, I called visual and was told 'continue' by...
Forum: Tech Log
25th Jan 2008, 13:23
Replies: 72
Views: 20,315
Posted By NoJoke

Ocktas8

The AB point was approximately 4.2 NM from the threshold so I continued, using the ILS as guidance. I was out in cowboy country where nobody speaks English. Try getting an actual wind or vis report...
Forum: Tech Log
24th Jan 2008, 12:06
Replies: 72
Views: 20,315
Posted By NoJoke

The required visibility was 1200 metres. The...

The required visibility was 1200 metres. The actual visibility was 1000 metres by the ATIS. There was no RVR requirements given on the approach plate, only vis. I continued the approach to the...
Forum: Tech Log
24th Jan 2008, 11:20
Replies: 72
Views: 20,315
Posted By NoJoke

Thanks profile

Being hassled for completing an approach. The Vis was 200 m below that which was required, but before reaching the aaproach ban point I was visual. Do you have a reference I could quote in my...
Forum: Tech Log
24th Jan 2008, 10:56
Replies: 72
Views: 20,315
Posted By NoJoke

Approach ban

HI guys. Done a search on the pprune but can't find an answer to this. If once reaching the approach ban point, are we allowed to proceed with the approach if we become visual with the airport?
Showing results 1 to 18 of 18


 
Forum Jump

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.