PPRuNe Forums - Search Results

Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Search Forums
Reload this Page >

Search Results

Wikiposts
Search
Search: Posts Made By: aterpster
Showing results 1 to 26 of 26
Search took 0.00 seconds.
10th Feb 2018, 21:38
Replies: 92
Views: 55,933
Posted By aterpster

I would never improvise a 3 degree path below...

I would never improvise a 3 degree path below MEA. That is contrary to all the efforts we made in the U.S. after TWA 514.

I would file and insist on routing over PXM V1 HUX.
9th Feb 2018, 15:17
Replies: 92
Views: 55,933
Posted By aterpster

Since the route passes through th Oaxaca TMA, it...

Since the route passes through th Oaxaca TMA, it appears controlled airspace goes down to 11,500 at the highest. What the base of controlled airspace is south of NUDOS is unknown to me.
9th Feb 2018, 14:00
Replies: 92
Views: 55,933
Posted By aterpster

I have just looked at the charts. I find it...

I have just looked at the charts. I find it unbelievable that the airport doesn't have STARS to make a safe descent onto the approaches. The only relief is a 13,400 MSA arriving from NUDOS. That...
8th Feb 2018, 15:36
Replies: 92
Views: 55,933
Posted By aterpster

Yep, having been an ALPA rep on the TWA 514 CFIT...

Yep, having been an ALPA rep on the TWA 514 CFIT I know how many rule, policy, and procedure changes were made because of the accident.

Alas, the BE1900 at PADL and this Medford near-hit point to...
8th Feb 2018, 13:35
Replies: 92
Views: 55,933
Posted By aterpster

Implied in that handbook example is that the...

Implied in that handbook example is that the 4,000' MVA doesn't subsequently increase further along the flight's cleared flight track. 7110.65 also states:
6th Feb 2018, 15:34
Replies: 92
Views: 55,933
Posted By aterpster

It would look the same except with the EFB...

It would look the same except with the EFB version you can zoom in.

A Part 121 operator wouldn't be carrying expired charts. In any case, this particular procedure hasn't been changed for years.
6th Feb 2018, 13:31
Replies: 92
Views: 55,933
Posted By aterpster

Here is the chart the crew was probably using. ...

Here is the chart the crew was probably using. Lots of terrain info. No area chart for Medford, though.
5th Feb 2018, 13:12
Replies: 92
Views: 55,933
Posted By aterpster

Lot's of new controller. As to checking...

Lot's of new controller.

As to checking terrain, so far as I know, no U.S. airline provides topographical aeronautical charts (called sectional charts). And, sectionals would not be of much value...
5th Feb 2018, 13:04
Replies: 92
Views: 55,933
Posted By aterpster

The controller didn't direct them to descend. He...

The controller didn't direct them to descend. He cleared them for the VOR/DME-C to cross CEGAN at, or above, 7,800. The crew should have "wrote off" that "at or above" either as quirky or accepted...
3rd Feb 2018, 13:02
Replies: 92
Views: 55,933
Posted By aterpster

cappt What's worse in this incident is that...

cappt

What's worse in this incident is that they weren't even being provided with radar vectors. I am very familiar with KMFR and agree wholeheartedly that the approaches from the south are...
3rd Feb 2018, 12:53
Replies: 92
Views: 55,933
Posted By aterpster

Here is a 3D view of the terrain:

Here is a 3D view of the terrain:
26th Jan 2018, 13:08
Replies: 92
Views: 55,933
Posted By aterpster

Here is another graphic, MVA chart on FAA chart...

Here is another graphic, MVA chart on FAA chart plan view:
25th Jan 2018, 13:17
Replies: 92
Views: 55,933
Posted By aterpster

Post #6 has the radar vectoring chart.

Post #6 has the radar vectoring chart.
25th Jan 2018, 13:15
Replies: 92
Views: 55,933
Posted By aterpster

Why couldn't the hypothetical Navajo pilot make...

Why couldn't the hypothetical Navajo pilot make the same decision to accept the clearance to 7,800? In such case, there would likely be no on-board TAWS to make the save.
25th Jan 2018, 13:12
Replies: 92
Views: 55,933
Posted By aterpster

I was speaking of the controller's duty position.

I was speaking of the controller's duty position.
24th Jan 2018, 13:03
Replies: 92
Views: 55,933
Posted By aterpster

In the U.S. the controller is responsible for...

In the U.S. the controller is responsible for terrain clearance whenever he uses his minimum vectoring altitudes. The flight was in a 7,800' MVA sector when cleared to descend to 7,800, but an 8,700...
23rd Jan 2018, 14:00
Replies: 92
Views: 55,933
Posted By aterpster

The chart is in the link in the original post. ...

The chart is in the link in the original post.

Also, FAA charts can be downloaded from the FAA:

https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/digital_products/dtpp/
22nd Jan 2018, 16:59
Replies: 92
Views: 55,933
Posted By aterpster

If the controller clears someone below the arc...

If the controller clears someone below the arc altitude, but at MVA or above, the DME arc has to be on the video map and the controller has to monitor the flght's navigation. I doubt either...
22nd Jan 2018, 16:56
Replies: 92
Views: 55,933
Posted By aterpster

trough They are supposed to have the paper...

trough

They are supposed to have the paper charts at their position and are supposed to be familiar with each IAP.
22nd Jan 2018, 16:55
Replies: 92
Views: 55,933
Posted By aterpster

It is very difficult to design approaches over...

It is very difficult to design approaches over this terrain. That's why there are no straight-in minimums on either this approach or the LOC DME (back course)-B. In fact the arc is in closer on the...
22nd Jan 2018, 12:34
Replies: 92
Views: 55,933
Posted By aterpster

KelvinD The turn anticipation to turn...

KelvinD

The turn anticipation to turn inbound from the DME arc is directly over Mt. Ashland, which is 7,731' msl, with an antenna on top.
21st Jan 2018, 21:58
Replies: 92
Views: 55,933
Posted By aterpster

RAT 5 Those are minimum vectoring altitudes...

RAT 5

Those are minimum vectoring altitudes (MVAs) not MORAs. The 10,000 is shown on the approach chart.
21st Jan 2018, 18:06
Replies: 92
Views: 55,933
Posted By aterpster

I'm surprised that KMFR isn't a FAR 121.445...

I'm surprised that KMFR isn't a FAR 121.445 special quals airport. Yet, KSFO is.
21st Jan 2018, 17:03
Replies: 92
Views: 55,933
Posted By aterpster

And, not the least: training.

And, not the least: training.
21st Jan 2018, 13:21
Replies: 92
Views: 55,933
Posted By aterpster

Here is the approach procedure and the MVA chart....

Here is the approach procedure and the MVA chart. When cleared for the approach the flight was in a 7,800' MVA sector. But, as they progressed on the DME arc to the intermediate fix BRKET, they...
21st Jan 2018, 00:52
Replies: 92
Views: 55,933
Posted By aterpster

Near CFIT at Medford, Oregon

Surprised this one hasn't been brought up:

Incident: Skywest CRJ9 at Medford on Dec 24th 2017, GPWS alert on approach (http://www.avherald.com/h?article=4b3d8f81&opt=0)
Showing results 1 to 26 of 26


 
Forum Jump

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.