PPRuNe Forums - Search Results
PPRuNe Forums

Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Search Forums
Reload this Page >

Search Results

Register
FAQ
Calendar
Wikiposts
Today's Posts
Search
Vendor Directory
Search: Posts Made By: aterpster
Showing results 1 to 25 of 25
Search took 0.00 seconds.
Forum: Tech Log
22nd Aug 2012, 21:20
Replies: 94
Views: 39,700
Posted By aterpster

FlightPathOBN: Two different issues. I...

FlightPathOBN:

Two different issues. I agreed with you on the ATC aspects several messages ago. RNP AR was intended to solve difficult terrain issues and typically at airports where ATC couldn't...
Forum: Tech Log
22nd Aug 2012, 17:55
Replies: 94
Views: 39,700
Posted By aterpster

That's why we have the database verification and...

That's why we have the database verification and flyability requirements set forth in AC90-101A.

If the procedure doesn't pass muster with a particular airframe/FMS combination, it cannot be...
Forum: Tech Log
21st Aug 2012, 14:22
Replies: 94
Views: 39,700
Posted By aterpster

FlightPathOBN: Those sound...

FlightPathOBN:




Those sound like issues with design of special RNP AR IAPs for a particular operator.

The only deference the FAA has made to avionics in the design of public RNP AR...
Forum: Tech Log
19th Aug 2012, 14:08
Replies: 94
Views: 39,700
Posted By aterpster

divinehover: The FAA is...

divinehover:




The FAA is presently in coordination with the first STAR with an RF leg. The process is not going smoothly, however. Not the least of all, the TRACON is having hissy fits...
Forum: Tech Log
24th Jul 2012, 01:15
Replies: 94
Views: 39,700
Posted By aterpster

FlightPathOBN: It is approved and...

FlightPathOBN:



It is approved and required for U.S. RNAV IAPs other than RNP AR.

I am sorry, I thought you were a procedures designer.

No wonder you have issues with FAA approvals...
Forum: Tech Log
23rd Jul 2012, 21:07
Replies: 94
Views: 39,700
Posted By aterpster

TF legs that short with a large course change are...

TF legs that short with a large course change are not permitted by Order 8260.54A. 8260.54A is more conservative in most respects than previous RNAV criteria directives.

RF legs are permitted...
Forum: Tech Log
23rd Jul 2012, 09:19
Replies: 94
Views: 39,700
Posted By aterpster

FlightPath: Because they ended up...

FlightPath:



Because they ended up placing too many RNP AR approaches were they are not needed nor particularly useful. Their purpose is where a significant terrain issue can only be...
Forum: Tech Log
22nd Jul 2012, 14:19
Replies: 94
Views: 39,700
Posted By aterpster

BOAC: Only the certificate holder...

BOAC:



Only the certificate holder and the government holding that certificate can provide the "proper answer" to the question posed.

In any case, threads like this do expand by follow-on...
Forum: Tech Log
22nd Jul 2012, 12:48
Replies: 94
Views: 39,700
Posted By aterpster

9.G: Wikipedia did get one item...

9.G:



Wikipedia did get one item wrong, or at least incomplete, and I quote:



At least one IRU is also required when any part of the approach phase requires RNP of less than 0.30,...
Forum: Tech Log
19th Jul 2012, 15:57
Replies: 94
Views: 39,700
Posted By aterpster

9.G: For the avionics engineer the...

9.G:



For the avionics engineer the coding is different for an RF leg than a DME ARC.

This is significant to the crew in the respect that the crew has no idea where the center point of an...
Forum: Tech Log
17th Jul 2012, 13:13
Replies: 94
Views: 39,700
Posted By aterpster

FlightPathOBN: That's what I have...

FlightPathOBN:



That's what I have been trying to state with respect to Westjet and RNP AR at KPSP.

1. Transport Canada

2. FAA AFS-470
Forum: Tech Log
16th Jul 2012, 11:47
Replies: 94
Views: 39,700
Posted By aterpster

FlightPathOBN: And, none of that...

FlightPathOBN:



And, none of that would have anything to do with Westjets getting FAA approval to use the public KPSP RNP AR instrument approach procedures.
Forum: Tech Log
15th Jul 2012, 23:21
Replies: 94
Views: 39,700
Posted By aterpster

FlightPathOBN: It doesn't? What...

FlightPathOBN:



It doesn't? What would you call Section 1a then?

http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/aa214/aterpster/826052MAS.jpg
Forum: Tech Log
15th Jul 2012, 14:48
Replies: 94
Views: 39,700
Posted By aterpster

FlightPathOBN: Which criteria? The...

FlightPathOBN:



Which criteria? The design criteria or the approval process? ICAO has accepted FAA Order 8260.52 the ICAO design standard.



If Westjets has been granted operational...
Forum: Tech Log
14th Jul 2012, 16:34
Replies: 94
Views: 39,700
Posted By aterpster

FlightPathOPN: You've lost me. All...

FlightPathOPN:



You've lost me. All I see at Seattle for RNAV are ordinary RNAV IAPs without course reversals. Those are all over the country.
Forum: Tech Log
14th Jul 2012, 14:19
Replies: 94
Views: 39,700
Posted By aterpster

Check out this RF leg: ...

Check out this RF leg:

http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/aa214/aterpster/06053ILDZ11.jpg
Forum: Tech Log
14th Jul 2012, 14:05
Replies: 94
Views: 39,700
Posted By aterpster

divineholder: Good idea. I doubt...

divineholder:



Good idea. I doubt you can manually build an RF leg in the 340. I don't know that with certainty however.



Depends your flight ops and the state that holds your...
Forum: Tech Log
14th Jul 2012, 01:22
Replies: 94
Views: 39,700
Posted By aterpster

9G: Because it is a PPrune thread. :)

9G:



Because it is a PPrune thread. :)
Forum: Tech Log
13th Jul 2012, 23:21
Replies: 94
Views: 39,700
Posted By aterpster

FlightPathOBN: RNP AR approaches...

FlightPathOBN:



RNP AR approaches may, or may not, have RF legs. There are many RNP AR IAPs in the U.S. with TF/TF legs and turns. RF legs are an optional application where they present the...
Forum: Tech Log
13th Jul 2012, 01:17
Replies: 94
Views: 39,700
Posted By aterpster

The "hub" of an RF leg is the "turn point." In...

The "hub" of an RF leg is the "turn point." In implementation in the U.S. that is called the "arc center point."

The reason most FMS vendors won't permit pilots to manually construct RF legs...
Forum: Tech Log
12th Jul 2012, 15:07
Replies: 94
Views: 39,700
Posted By aterpster

9.G Jeppesen will not publish public...

9.G



Jeppesen will not publish public (non AR) procedures with RF legs until such time that the FAA (and presumably other states as well) authorize the public use of RF legs in non-AR IAPs.
...
Forum: Tech Log
11th Jul 2012, 13:42
Replies: 94
Views: 39,700
Posted By aterpster

rennaps: In the U.S. at least most...

rennaps:



In the U.S. at least most operators permit an RNP AR 0.30 IAP to be hand-flown but using the flight director. Below 0.30, autoflight is required.

Presumably, a departure with...
Forum: Tech Log
10th Jul 2012, 13:36
Replies: 94
Views: 39,700
Posted By aterpster

Only AIPs on HK site are the current one 07/12 ...

Only AIPs on HK site are the current one 07/12
and archive 06/12 and 05/12.

The current one fails to complete download. Poor connection.
Forum: Tech Log
10th Jul 2012, 13:18
Replies: 94
Views: 39,700
Posted By aterpster

divineholder: I am looking at the...

divineholder:



I am looking at the current Jeppesen charts and a current database. The turn at ROVER appears to be a flyby waypoint to a TF leg. There is no mention of an RF leg.

I'll...
Forum: Tech Log
10th Jul 2012, 11:41
Replies: 94
Views: 39,700
Posted By aterpster

divinehover: We Yanks converted from...

divinehover:



We Yanks converted from SAAAR to AR about 2 years ago.

Which departures at VHHH have RF legs? I can't locate them.
Showing results 1 to 25 of 25


 
Forum Jump

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.