PPRuNe Forums - Search Results

Search: Posts Made By: Mäx Reverse

Showing results 1 to 4 of 4
Search took 0.00 seconds.

Forum: Tech Log

20th Oct 2008, 16:37

Replies: 10

A320 IR1+2+3 Fault Ldg Dist Proc

Views: 4,315

Posted By Mäx Reverse

Thanks again for ongoing inputs, tyropicard. ...

Thanks again for ongoing inputs, tyropicard.

Well regarding the statistical failure probabilities I get a pain the proverbial and to my knowledge there have been at least two tripple IR failures,...

Forum: Tech Log

19th Oct 2008, 08:21

Replies: 10

A320 IR1+2+3 Fault Ldg Dist Proc

Views: 4,315

Posted By Mäx Reverse

Still standing by for the answer from our...

Still standing by for the answer from our engineers/training gurus, so just a couple of thoughts.

- 1.7 m/sec² is the kind of braking that autobrake low results in - and thats pretty close to no...

Forum: Tech Log

15th Oct 2008, 20:22

Replies: 10

A320 IR1+2+3 Fault Ldg Dist Proc

Views: 4,315

Posted By Mäx Reverse

Very interesting so far, thanks! Since AI...

Very interesting so far, thanks!

Since AI revised the Landing Distand Calculation procedure in case of Systen Abnormals (~ 2 yrs ago?), we changed our QRH respectively. These are the Factors for...

Forum: Tech Log

15th Oct 2008, 08:56

Replies: 10

A320 IR1+2+3 Fault Ldg Dist Proc

Views: 4,315

Posted By Mäx Reverse

A320 IR1+2+3 Fault Ldg Dist Proc

Hi there everyone,

with an tripple IR-Fault the A320-QRH calls for a landings distance factor of 2,35 for DRY RWY which is in the magnitude of the factor for EMER ELEC or G+Y HYD Failure.
...

Showing results 1 to 4 of 4