PPRuNe Forums - Search Results

Search: Posts Made By: vilas

Showing results 1 to 11 of 11
Search took 0.00 seconds.

Forum: Tech Log

12th Apr 2014, 03:11

Replies: 813

Habsheim

Views: 153,895

Posted By vilas

DOZY I am in agreement with you and I also do...

DOZY
I am in agreement with you and I also do not believe there pilots out there who do not know that Airbus can be stalled in alternate law. Pilots are getting complacent on automation and loosing...

Forum: Tech Log

11th Apr 2014, 13:30

Replies: 813

Habsheim

Views: 153,895

Posted By vilas

gums 447 and Habsheim are two different things....

gums
447 and Habsheim are two different things. Protection was never an issue in AF447 as the aircraft was in alternate law and you could always stall. It was lack of procedural knowledge on part of...

Forum: Tech Log

17th Feb 2014, 02:27

Replies: 813

Habsheim

Views: 153,895

Posted By vilas

CONF iture With full backstick flight path...

CONF iture
With full backstick flight path change due to elevators is taken out of equation so you can only climb due to thrust vector but it has to develop first then overcome the momentum so there...

Forum: Tech Log

2nd Jan 2014, 05:37

Replies: 813

Habsheim

Views: 153,895

Posted By vilas

Conf iture The aircraft was in high AOA...

Conf iture
The aircraft was in high AOA protection mode which has priority over everything else. If the pilot was applying back stick why would the aircraft apply down elevators to prevent thrust...

Forum: Tech Log

18th Dec 2013, 11:26

Replies: 813

Habsheim

Views: 153,895

Posted By vilas

In a non precision approach MDA all authorities...

In a non precision approach MDA all authorities insist on +50ft. because when you execute a GA you are expected to loose that much and You are at Vapp at that point which is at least say 30 kts...

Forum: Tech Log

17th Dec 2013, 01:37

Replies: 813

Habsheim

Views: 153,895

Posted By vilas

According to me planning this fly past at 100ft...

According to me planning this fly past at 100ft was not a problem but doing so at Valpha Max was an accident waiting to happen. Nobody can fly at dead 100ft at minimumm speed with hardly any elevator...

Forum: Tech Log

16th Dec 2013, 11:40

Replies: 813

Habsheim

Views: 153,895

Posted By vilas

r r r I am unable to paste the report in...

r r r
I am unable to paste the report in google for translation. Below is what you wanted.
DSC-27-20-10-20 P 4/6
In addition, below 200 ft, the angle of attack protection is also deactivated,...

Forum: Tech Log

16th Dec 2013, 10:26

Replies: 813

Habsheim

Views: 153,895

Posted By vilas

r r r If the speed went below alpha prot only...

r r r
If the speed went below alpha prot only when they went below 100ft then offcourse alpha floor was disabled. Did the pilot know that? The Airbus design is such that it is possible to fly...

Forum: Tech Log

16th Dec 2013, 03:47

Replies: 813

Habsheim

Views: 153,895

Posted By vilas

Dozy, Chris r r r I think unnecessary lengthy...

Dozy, Chris r r r
I think unnecessary lengthy technical discussion is going on when there are some simple aviation facts staring in the face. I do not know what was planned but you can see what was...

Forum: Tech Log

14th Dec 2013, 08:40

Replies: 813

Habsheim

Views: 153,895

Posted By vilas

r r r I do not have access to English version...

r r r
I do not have access to English version of the report. From what I read in the posts,I consider the following. The pilot wanted to fly as slow as possible by flying at Valpha Max by holding...

Forum: Tech Log

13th Dec 2013, 10:06

Replies: 813

Habsheim

Views: 153,895

Posted By vilas

r r r "Why on earth they were so close to Alpha...

r r r
"Why on earth they were so close to Alpha Max AND Low Height AND Idle Thrust is beyond me".

One guess is that the crew wanted to keep the aircraft in view for a longer time by taking...

Showing results 1 to 11 of 11