PPRuNe Forums - Search Results

Search: Posts Made By: ImbracableCrunk

Showing results 1 to 5 of 5
Search took 0.00 seconds.

Forum: Tech Log

2nd Nov 2016, 21:05

Replies: 19

737 CL & NG MCT (CON) for Normal use

Views: 6,790

Posted By ImbracableCrunk

I wouldn't think so, but I wonder where Boeing...

I wouldn't think so, but I wonder where Boeing get their opinion when the FAA memo was out 9ish years prior.

Forum: Tech Log

2nd Nov 2016, 13:20

Replies: 19

737 CL & NG MCT (CON) for Normal use

Views: 6,790

Posted By ImbracableCrunk

I saw that FAA letter, too. It's dated 2000. The...

I saw that FAA letter, too. It's dated 2000. The Boeing Doc is from 2009. I don't know if the Boeing JTPM would (or could) supersede an FAA memo.

Forum: Tech Log

1st Nov 2016, 20:28

Replies: 19

737 CL & NG MCT (CON) for Normal use

Views: 6,790

Posted By ImbracableCrunk

Skyjob, CON and CLB are not the same,...

Skyjob,

CON and CLB are not the same, although they may match. Note that with U11.0, the limit in cruise reverts to CLB now, not CON.

From Boeing's Jet Transport Performance Methods:
...

Forum: Tech Log

31st Oct 2016, 23:38

Replies: 19

737 CL & NG MCT (CON) for Normal use

Views: 6,790

Posted By ImbracableCrunk

Thanks. I should be more specific. When CON...

Thanks. I should be more specific.

When CON is greater thanCLB is my question. For climbs, not cruise, eg. low-level restrictions for at or above on SIDs.

Forum: Tech Log

31st Oct 2016, 22:12

Replies: 19

737 CL & NG MCT (CON) for Normal use

Views: 6,790

Posted By ImbracableCrunk

737 CL & NG MCT (CON) for Normal use

I've heard varying opinions on whether MCT or CON is for non-normal situations when it is greater than CLB, specifically in climbs where CLB is less than CON.

I can't find anything in the AFM that...

Showing results 1 to 5 of 5