PPRuNe Forums - Search Results

Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Search Forums
Reload this Page >

Search Results

Wikiposts
Search
Search: Posts Made By: Backtrack
Showing results 1 to 5 of 5
Search took 0.00 seconds.
16th Jan 2005, 15:34
Replies: 498
Views: 107,493
Posted By Backtrack

If this really is the case, then why hasn't more...

If this really is the case, then why hasn't more been made of it? There would surely be no need for a claim under sex discrimination legislation.

But then I'm not a lawyer......:confused:...
12th Jan 2005, 19:11
Replies: 498
Views: 107,493
Posted By Backtrack

Interesting to read from Big Hilly's cut & paste...

Interesting to read from Big Hilly's cut & paste form the BALPA website that she is claiming on the grounds of indirect sex discrimination because women/mothers are more likely to apply for part-time...
12th Jan 2005, 11:23
Replies: 498
Views: 107,493
Posted By Backtrack

Probabably not. But then, with her 1,200hr...

Probabably not. But then, with her 1,200hr experience quoted elsewhere, she's unlikely to have the "experience" to be on the 744 fleet. 1,200hr wouldn't get you to an interview with some carriers....
10th Jan 2005, 22:17
Replies: 498
Views: 107,493
Posted By Backtrack

If BA did move the goal posts mid gestation, then...

If BA did move the goal posts mid gestation, then why hasn't more be made of this by the plaintiff/BALPA? No report I've seen alludes to this.
10th Jan 2005, 16:24
Replies: 498
Views: 107,493
Posted By Backtrack

The Daily Telegraph also had an article about...

The Daily Telegraph also had an article about this case.

Apparently BA will only grant Ms Starmer 75% because they deem it inappropriate for pilots with less that 2,000hr to be given 50%...
Showing results 1 to 5 of 5


 
Forum Jump

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.