PPRuNe Forums - Search Results
PPRuNe Forums

Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Search Forums
Reload this Page >

Search Results

Register
FAQ
Calendar
Wikiposts
Today's Posts
Search
Vendor Directory
Search: Posts Made By: Andy_RR
Showing results 1 to 10 of 10
Search took 0.00 seconds.
Forum: The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
25th Jan 2019, 09:07
Replies: 102
Views: 15,908
Posted By Andy_RR

This is kinda cool too: ...

This is kinda cool too:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W65ooyvrktg
Forum: The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
25th Jan 2019, 09:02
Replies: 102
Views: 15,908
Posted By Andy_RR

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2glZyBssp44

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2glZyBssp44
Forum: The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
29th Dec 2018, 11:07
Replies: 102
Views: 15,908
Posted By Andy_RR

Thanks! Will have a read.

Thanks! Will have a read.
Forum: The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
29th Dec 2018, 08:57
Replies: 102
Views: 15,908
Posted By Andy_RR

So, is the history and reasoning behind CASA...

So, is the history and reasoning behind CASA 96/17 documented anywhere?
Forum: The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
29th Dec 2018, 06:59
Replies: 102
Views: 15,908
Posted By Andy_RR

Yeah, but why do the regulations have to say one...

Yeah, but why do the regulations have to say one thing and a direction say another? Why can't they get their shït sorted...?
Forum: The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
29th Dec 2018, 05:53
Replies: 102
Views: 15,908
Posted By Andy_RR

OK. That looks like the big hammer they'd use. ...

OK. That looks like the big hammer they'd use. Nasty that it's hidden so well that a reasonably detailed reading of the rule book doesn't reveal it. How many more directions are out there...?
Forum: The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
29th Dec 2018, 04:23
Replies: 102
Views: 15,908
Posted By Andy_RR

101.235 says the whole of Subpart 101 F does not...

101.235 says the whole of Subpart 101 F does not apply to flying RPAs for the purposes of sport or recreation other than large RPAs. I guess in this case Subpart 101 G still mostly applies to...
Forum: The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
28th Dec 2018, 09:01
Replies: 102
Views: 15,908
Posted By Andy_RR

I agree with your reasoning on 101.075 and...

I agree with your reasoning on 101.075 and 101.085 exactly, Captain! Given the definition of model aircraft in the dictionary (model aircraft means an aircraft that is used for sport or recreation,...
Forum: The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
27th Dec 2018, 01:34
Replies: 102
Views: 15,908
Posted By Andy_RR

Could someone please parse a legal interpretation...

Could someone please parse a legal interpretation of 101.075(1) for me please? To me it seems there is an "and" or an "or" missing in the sentence. The way I read it is "at an altitude above 400 feet...
Forum: The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
23rd Dec 2018, 11:53
Replies: 102
Views: 15,908
Posted By Andy_RR

I don't get the "only below 400ft" mantra and the...

I don't get the "only below 400ft" mantra and the 3mn from airports since CASR101 only aeems to be regulating things above 400ft as far as I read them. Can anyone quote me chapter and verse of the...
Showing results 1 to 10 of 10


 
Forum Jump

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.