PPRuNe Forums - Search Results

Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Search Forums
Reload this Page >

Search Results

Wikiposts
Search
Search: Posts Made By: NonSAC
Showing results 1 to 31 of 31
Search took 0.00 seconds.
Forum: Rotorheads
7th Oct 2011, 13:42
Replies: 201
Views: 61,077
Posted By NonSAC

Re. Impact on Eurocopter Like so many...

Re. Impact on Eurocopter

Like so many things, it "depends".

Patent protection is country specific, so inventors seeking protection beyond the borders of a single country sometimes file...
Forum: Rotorheads
6th Aug 2011, 18:17
Replies: 25
Views: 6,719
Posted By NonSAC

John, Please, one must have better eyes to...

John,

Please, one must have better eyes to monitor the Housatonic from Hobe Sound.

"a certified NAV and FMS coupled autopilot to include all approved IFR approaches" sounds like a critical...
Forum: Rotorheads
6th Aug 2011, 14:12
Replies: 25
Views: 6,719
Posted By NonSAC

Truly unfortunate to see a lower trim grade of...

Truly unfortunate to see a lower trim grade of the UH-60M being knocked off in Eastern Europe.

It makes me wonder how UTC's lobbying effort to dillute the domestic content rules for military...
Forum: Rotorheads
22nd Jun 2011, 23:51
Replies: 55
Views: 13,644
Posted By NonSAC

Dave, It is interesting to see the...

Dave,

It is interesting to see the Examiner's comment regarding the NPL in the advisory action as it's not my understanding that the Applicant is under any obligation wahtsoever to discuss, much...
Forum: Rotorheads
30th Jan 2011, 12:13
Replies: 55
Views: 13,644
Posted By NonSAC

Dave, With respect to the grounds for...

Dave,

With respect to the grounds for rejection under 35 USC 103, this is the obviousness statute. And in the mechanical arts, it is relatively unsettled. The trend is for the PTO to be more...
Forum: Rotorheads
30th Jan 2011, 11:48
Replies: 55
Views: 13,644
Posted By NonSAC

Riff Raff, I understand frustration at the...

Riff Raff,

I understand frustration at the process.

It's not uncommon that, upon review of the application, office action, and cited references, that an inventor/attorney gets frustrated with...
Forum: Rotorheads
30th Jan 2011, 11:20
Replies: 55
Views: 13,644
Posted By NonSAC

Response After Final Office Action

Dave,

No, this is not the beginning of a judicial appeal of the Examiner's rejection. It may, however, be a lookahead of what Sikorsky's appeal brief might include.

Generally, once a final...
Forum: Rotorheads
14th Jan 2011, 02:29
Replies: 1,701
Views: 471,740
Posted By NonSAC

Ah, I understand. It's not to suggest that...

Ah, I understand.

It's not to suggest that someone is doing a bad job, but rather that the tool, ie. the structure of the force to which they belong, is too specialized to be useful.
...
Forum: Rotorheads
13th Jan 2011, 23:05
Replies: 1,701
Views: 471,740
Posted By NonSAC

Whether there is a continuing need for a seperate...

Whether there is a continuing need for a seperate Marine Corps is a question that periodically resurfaces.

A nice summary of the 1947 'Corps Crisis' can be found here:
The Challenge Of The...
Forum: Rotorheads
19th Dec 2010, 01:04
Replies: 55
Views: 13,644
Posted By NonSAC

Dave, Interesting news. It appears...

Dave,

Interesting news.

It appears that the claimed invention is novel, as in never been done before, but obvious in view of the US Examiner's view of what is known in the art. As you...
Forum: Rotorheads
24th Jul 2010, 01:43
Replies: 56
Views: 12,940
Posted By NonSAC

Interesting points. (Observations are in...

Interesting points. (Observations are in brackets)

Ian - Shouldn't that picture be more clearly showing an industrial-sized set of booster cables??...
Forum: Rotorheads
23rd Jul 2010, 21:36
Replies: 56
Views: 12,940
Posted By NonSAC

Dave, Fairly cool stuff. The Europeans...

Dave,

Fairly cool stuff. The Europeans appear to be focused on solving all the electric motor substitution problems first while allowing the battery industry to solve the power density issue...
Forum: Rotorheads
23rd Jul 2010, 14:06
Replies: 56
Views: 12,940
Posted By NonSAC

Dave, The US Patent Office appears to agree...

Dave,

The US Patent Office appears to agree with you, at least insofar as in the way Sikorsky claimed an invention embodying some of these concepts in US Patent Application No. 12/018,217.
...
Forum: Rotorheads
28th Feb 2010, 16:48
Replies: 925
Views: 348,197
Posted By NonSAC

Cornflaker apparatus...

Dave,
You’ve asked an interesting question. Reviewing the relevant publication helps to an extent, but doesn’t definitively answer the question.

2007-0125907 is the publication number of US...
Forum: Rotorheads
30th Dec 2009, 03:22
Replies: 55
Views: 13,644
Posted By NonSAC

Dave, I expect the examiner will use what...

Dave,

I expect the examiner will use what he considers the 'best reference' or 'references' to reject the claims he deems unpatenable in Sikorsky's application. Whether that includes US 4,720,059...
Forum: Rotorheads
24th Dec 2009, 17:46
Replies: 55
Views: 13,644
Posted By NonSAC

Dave, Shortly after this discussion WIPO...

Dave,

Shortly after this discussion WIPO published a search report addressing the related international application. The international search report is available at...
Forum: Rotorheads
24th Dec 2009, 14:47
Replies: 925
Views: 348,197
Posted By NonSAC

Helicopter with leading edge servo flaps (Kaman)

Dave,

Check out US 5,409,183; seems to have cover a bit of what you're looking for in connection with Kaman's work in this technology.

This particular patent, issued in 1995, has lapsed for...
Forum: Rotorheads
12th Dec 2009, 19:09
Replies: 2,002
Views: 662,475
Posted By NonSAC

No, putting the President into a 92 derivative...

No, putting the President into a 92 derivative was an ancillary objective of the VH-92.

The main idea is to resolve some of the shortcomings of the original machine with government cash - sort of...
Forum: Rotorheads
17th Nov 2009, 23:57
Replies: 1,141
Views: 339,788
Posted By NonSAC

Actually, the S-92A experience has shown that...

Actually, the S-92A experience has shown that Sikorsky won't argue anything; the strategy appears to be to keep it out of the media by settling quietly with the next of kin.

I can't say I agree...
Forum: Rotorheads
24th Oct 2009, 12:42
Replies: 2,002
Views: 662,475
Posted By NonSAC

Maxwelg nailed it, though only through Shell...

Maxwelg nailed it, though only through Shell Management's prodding.

The product is badly flawed, and needs to be revised. SAC needs to address the product safety issues through a follow-on B'...
Forum: Rotorheads
12th Sep 2009, 15:16
Replies: 19
Views: 5,724
Posted By NonSAC

Perhaps this is explained by the fact that these...

Perhaps this is explained by the fact that these SAC test pilots spend their time testing Kaman products once SAC has snapped them together with GE engines other sundries in Sratford prior to...
Forum: Rotorheads
14th Aug 2009, 23:52
Replies: 55
Views: 13,644
Posted By NonSAC

Dave, The ten rNPL references you submitted...

Dave,

The ten rNPL references you submitted to the USPTO to consider in the examination of this application were made of record on July 17, 2009. They are visible out in PAIR, and accessible from...
Forum: Rotorheads
15th Jul 2009, 22:18
Replies: 55
Views: 13,644
Posted By NonSAC

Hmm, not sure. This would take some digging - a...

Hmm, not sure. This would take some digging - a quick search found a document whereby WIPO recently discussed changing the rules to allow both applicant and third party art submissions, so I believe...
Forum: Rotorheads
10th Jul 2009, 01:47
Replies: 55
Views: 13,644
Posted By NonSAC

Yes, the Protest window closes upon publication. ...

Yes, the Protest window closes upon publication.

The 1.99 rule has some limitations as well, including that the references be patents or publications, that no explanation be provided, a limit of...
Forum: Rotorheads
6th Jul 2009, 00:38
Replies: 55
Views: 13,644
Posted By NonSAC

(1) The 60 day period commenced the date the...

(1) The 60 day period commenced the date the patent application was published, which I believe is June 4, 2009. The date will be printed on the face of the publication which is readily available,...
Forum: Rotorheads
4th Jul 2009, 13:29
Replies: 55
Views: 13,644
Posted By NonSAC

We're a bit different in the US. Wikipedia...

We're a bit different in the US. Wikipedia explains in a general way how, in the US, employer shop-rights can attach to employee inventions created at work and owned by the employee. These can...
Forum: Rotorheads
4th Jul 2009, 12:40
Replies: 55
Views: 13,644
Posted By NonSAC

Dave, "The original 60/991,395 ..." ...

Dave,

"The original 60/991,395 ..."

You've got the right idea in the way you've described the relationship. What the applicants have done is filed a US nonprovisional application, US...
Forum: Rotorheads
3rd Jul 2009, 13:46
Replies: 55
Views: 13,644
Posted By NonSAC

Dave, In terms of procedure, I suggest you...

Dave,

In terms of procedure, I suggest you review the Chapter 1900 of the MPEP.

The MPEP lays out the boundaries of 'Protests by the Public Against Pending Applications' under 37 CFR 1.291;...
Forum: Rotorheads
2nd Jul 2009, 01:14
Replies: 55
Views: 13,644
Posted By NonSAC

Regarding places to look for further information:...

Regarding places to look for further information:

(1) Sikorsky has filed a related international application with like disclosure and claims as PCT/US08/76962, published on June 25, 2009.
- This...
Forum: Rotorheads
30th Jun 2009, 02:28
Replies: 55
Views: 13,644
Posted By NonSAC

Dave, Re: "However, it appears that all, or...

Dave,

Re: "However, it appears that all, or most, of the world's patent offices will not patent an invention after it is in the public domain and is perhaps already being used by others."

As...
Forum: Rotorheads
28th Jun 2009, 22:55
Replies: 55
Views: 13,644
Posted By NonSAC

Question Easy now ... no need to panic.

Let's not acuse without solid grounds.

(1) This is not a patent. This is the merely the 18-month from earliest priority date publication of the application. The application has not been examined,...
Showing results 1 to 31 of 31


 
Forum Jump

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.