PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Safety, CRM, QA & Emergency Response Planning (https://www.pprune.org/safety-crm-qa-emergency-response-planning-93/)
-   -   Air Transat - "Panic in the Cockpit" recording (https://www.pprune.org/safety-crm-qa-emergency-response-planning/341223-air-transat-panic-cockpit-recording.html)

a300guy 31st Aug 2008 01:32

Air Transat - "Panic in the Cockpit" recording
 
Does anyone have a link to the ATC recording of the March 2008 incident involving Air Transat departing Quebec City? This was the recording that had inadvertently recorded the cockpit conversations on an ATC frequency due to a held mike switch.

This recording was originally available on Live ATC, but seems to have been removed.

Dream Land 31st Aug 2008 14:18

I just listened to it at Live ATC.net, all in French. :eek:

Link, you must register. ::(

Jumbo744 1st Sep 2008 04:52

:eek: real panic. horrible to hear those voices screaming. good they made it.

411A 1st Sep 2008 06:37


I just listened to it at Live ATC.net, all in French. :eek:
Perhaps that's why the panic...:rolleyes:

I can honestly say, that in 40 years of professional flying, never have I had 'panic' on the FD.

Of course, there was the one time....
when all the switchlights on the flight controls electronic panel were flashing like mad, just after takeoff, and at the same time, number three engine was having a case of pod nod whereupon the Flight Engineer was beside himself...I reset a couple of flight control monitor switchlights and adjusted the number three throttle to stop the pod nod, and he soon stopped screaming...OMG, we're all going to die.:ugh::ugh:

ETOPS 1st Sep 2008 06:56

What was the panic all about? Don't speak French malheuresment

jimworcs 1st Sep 2008 07:19

Link doesn't work
 
Any chance of the actual address to go to?

threemiles 1st Sep 2008 07:33

You will find it under Captured Recordings, then March 15, 2008
To access the area you need to register

212man 1st Sep 2008 08:21

What was the incident, and why did they only declare a PAN if they/he were/was that alarmed? (what would the reaction to a MAYDAY event be???)

Dream Land 1st Sep 2008 10:25

Sorry about the link, here is the home page: LiveATC Discussion Forums - Index | LiveATC.net


why did they only declare a PAN if they/he were/was that alarmed? (what would the reaction to a MAYDAY event be???)
That's what I was thinking. :rolleyes:

BeechNut 1st Sep 2008 15:47

I'm fluent in French (in fact do most of my radio work in French here in Quebec), so I'll take a crack at it. Here's a summary of the incident:

They took off from YQB with RVR of 1400 ft (given the date, I'd say another of the many snowstorms in YQB this past winter).

On initial climb, there was a panicked female voice in the cockpit saying "what's going on", and some sort of bell ringing; another male voice said "tabarnac" (Québecois slang expletive, based on a sacred religious object, but you can insert "sh!t" here and get the same effect), and also "what's going on?".

Then in French they declared a "pan pan pan", stating an airspeed indication problem, and asked for immediate clearance to a higher altitude (10,000 ft). On the way up they asked tower for a groundspeed and altitude readout.

By the time they reached 10k ft, they asked for another altitude check and they asked for a climb to FL220; they got 13k initially, then FL220. The problem seems to have sorted itself out and airspeed indication restored to normal and they canceled the Pan call and proceeded to YUL.

One assumes that the request for both altitude and speed readouts from the tower was to diagnose if it was the pitot or static port that was plugged.

Not a good situation to lose your instruments actually, they were in solid IMC.

Beech

Jumbo744 1st Sep 2008 15:53

translation of the guy screaming:

"What's happening!!! what's happening!!!!"
"God damn!!!"
"Hervé (not sure about it) what is going on??!!!!"
"I know, I know but...."

beechnut has a more detailed version, thanks beechnut. I heard they had hit windshear and lost 1700' from 3000'

westinghouse 1st Sep 2008 15:56

what was the acft type in this incident?
anyone has the full translation?

silverhawk 1st Sep 2008 16:02

411A

re panic

in your decades of magnificent flying, I think there was panic every time an FO saw your name on his/her roster.

Retirement is a two pronged tool.

Jumbo744 1st Sep 2008 16:52

westinghouse
 
i think it was a A310

threemiles 1st Sep 2008 19:59


On the way up they asked tower for a groundspeed and altitude readout.
If there is a pitot tube blocked the radar controller will not give you a different altitude than your altimeter, except on 1013 than local QNH. Aero Peru 757 Flight 603 relied on the same misunderstanding and touched the ocean's surface. Ground speed may help a little to judge IAS, though.

alph2z 1st Sep 2008 20:51

WOW, pretty erie, :eek:

For a full transcription and translation see

airdisaster.info • View topic - Air Transat 211 Panic in the Cockpit recording

.

Raredata 1st Sep 2008 20:58

Something really scared those guys!!.Quite chilling!Makes me air all stand up! Ugly business at times flying !! What happened?

fullyspooled 1st Sep 2008 21:50

Sounds chilling indeed - whatever the cause! I doubt that any ppruners (except perhaps 411) would consider it innapropriate that the Captain's over riding concen, despite his (or her) state of alarm, was altitude and airspeed (or groundspeed, given the possible circumstances).

Over to 411, who I am sure has far more experience with dealing with such matters - and without the input of an FE.

BeechNut 1st Sep 2008 22:26


If there is a pitot tube blocked the radar controller will not give you a different altitude than your altimeter, except on 1013 than local QNH. Aero Peru 757 Flight 603 relied on the same misunderstanding and touched the ocean's surface. Ground speed may help a little to judge IAS, though.
What does a blocked pitot tube have to do with erroneous altitude indications???

I have had blocked pitots before but never any issue with altitude readouts.

And wasn't the issue in the Aero Peru accident blocked static ports?

Beech

CdnAvSpotter 2nd Sep 2008 01:37

First it was an Airbus A310 that they were flying and not a tristar L-1011. Air transat does not have any active L1011's in their fleet. So there is no flight engineer.

It appears that they flew into some wind sheer, dropped from 3000 ft to 1300 ft which caused a loss of altitude and airspeed indications. They then asked for their ground speed and altitude from the controller and then climbed to 6000 ft. After climbing, they restored the instruments and were transfered to Montreal Centre.


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:52.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.