STS-107 Columbia crew survival investigation report.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Europe
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
STS-107 Columbia crew survival investigation report.
NASA has published a report on STS-107 addressing the investigation into the loss of the space shuttle Columbia.
Very interesting, but sobering reading in this 400 page document.
The accident was found to be unsurvivable.
Rgds TS737
Very interesting, but sobering reading in this 400 page document.
The accident was found to be unsurvivable.
Rgds TS737
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
TS - a thorough report indeed. What I find incredible is, that reading 'between the lines', there was a chance that the crew might just have survived the 4 'potentially lethal events' (although probably injured), which considering the intensely hostile environment in which they were is amazing. I deduce that a serious review of equipment and procedures would be a good idea!
I have not had time to read it thoroughly, but was there any indication that the crew should have been (and were not) warned to expect possible loss of structural integrity due to the known damage at launch? If they had been, might they all have been seated, visors down and seat harnesses locked when it all began and they depressurised? The design parameters for the 'survival suit' are quite amazing.
I have not had time to read it thoroughly, but was there any indication that the crew should have been (and were not) warned to expect possible loss of structural integrity due to the known damage at launch? If they had been, might they all have been seated, visors down and seat harnesses locked when it all began and they depressurised? The design parameters for the 'survival suit' are quite amazing.
Supercharged PPRuNer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Doon the watter, a million miles from the sandpit.
Posts: 1,183
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
According to the report, the foam strike was known about and advised to the crew by mission control, but they were told it posed no risk to the orbiter.
Only fragments of the pressure suits were recovered, which would suggest the 'catastrohic event' was at an altitude and speed outside the suits' design parameters.
If there's one crumb of comfort, it's that the depressurisation was apparently so rapid that the crew didn't even have time to lower their visors - i.e. it was all over in a matter of seconds.
Only fragments of the pressure suits were recovered, which would suggest the 'catastrohic event' was at an altitude and speed outside the suits' design parameters.
If there's one crumb of comfort, it's that the depressurisation was apparently so rapid that the crew didn't even have time to lower their visors - i.e. it was all over in a matter of seconds.
According to the report, the foam strike was known about and advised to the crew by mission control, but they were told it posed no risk to the orbiter.
According to nasa foam falling of the external tank on launch is normal so they didn't see it as any majour risk to the shuttle.
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, I saw it too.
Flight was worried about it from the time of the incident but did nothing. The safety board were so lax they hardly even discussed it.
So many failures it's hard to know where to point the finger suffice to say things apparently are now much better.
Only interesting point for me is the fact that if they had known about it and left them up there to await rescue is whether NASA could have pulled off another remarkable save. If not, as NASA also said, they were better off dying as they did then either dying slowly in orbit or attempting a re-entry knowing they stood almost no chance of living.
Flight was worried about it from the time of the incident but did nothing. The safety board were so lax they hardly even discussed it.
So many failures it's hard to know where to point the finger suffice to say things apparently are now much better.
Only interesting point for me is the fact that if they had known about it and left them up there to await rescue is whether NASA could have pulled off another remarkable save. If not, as NASA also said, they were better off dying as they did then either dying slowly in orbit or attempting a re-entry knowing they stood almost no chance of living.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
reading 'between the lines', there was a chance that the crew might just have survived
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, on a more thorough reading I can see the event was well outside the survival parameters. The suit was still impressive, though at 100,000ft and 560kts EAS! Interesting to note the comparison with the SR71 suit performance, and I see the suit failure may have been aggravated by the open visors (3-46).
I was pleased to see that the crew received worthy praise for their attempts to diagnose the unknown events before the CE.
I was pleased to see that the crew received worthy praise for their attempts to diagnose the unknown events before the CE.
Drain Bamaged
There is a very good summary of the report here.
Spaceflight Now | STS-107 Mission Report | NASA releases post-Columbia crew survival study
Worthy praise for the crew indeed...
Spaceflight Now | STS-107 Mission Report | NASA releases post-Columbia crew survival study
Worthy praise for the crew indeed...
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UTC +8
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
norodnik . . .
Only interesting point for me is the fact that if they had known about it and left them up there to await rescue is whether NASA could have pulled off another remarkable save. If not, as NASA also said, they were better off dying as they did then either dying slowly in orbit or attempting a re-entry knowing they stood almost no chance of living.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
improvised transfer to the International Space Station would have been possible