Safety, CRM, QA & Emergency Response Planning A wide ranging forum for issues facing Aviation Professionals and Academics

L@ser attacks on Aircraft

Old 11th Dec 2009, 19:54
  #401 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bedford, UK
Age: 70
Posts: 1,319
Received 19 Likes on 11 Posts
200 hrs community service

for illuminating police helicopter: BBC report here
BBC News - Laser light man avoids jail term
Mr Optimistic is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2009, 09:08
  #402 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Esher, Surrey
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another BBC item on the situation in the UK including the rising number of events.

BBC News - Crackdown on laser pen yobs
beamender99 is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2009, 04:44
  #403 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: In transit
Age: 70
Posts: 3,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Helicopter laser thug jailed for four months

Jailed: Liam Coe flashed a laser pointer at a police helicopter

A thug who tried to dazzle an airborne police helicopter pilot by shining a green laser pen at him has been jailed for four months.

Liam Coe, 21, shone it from the ground at the cockpit of the aircraft being flown at 600ft by Captain Richard Hornby over Manchester.

Kim Irving, prosecuting, said: 'The pilot said it could have been very dangerous.'

Coe, from Hollingworth, Greater Manchester, pleaded guilty to recklessly acting in a manner likely to endanger an aircraft.

Jailing him on Friday, Judge Andrew Lowcock said: 'That was the most appalingly dangerous thing to do. It could have had the most terrible consequences. People involved in these things must go to prison.'

Helicopter laser thug jailed | Mail Online
Capetonian is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2009, 13:54
  #404 (permalink)  

Eight Gun Fighter
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Western Approaches
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts


Sometimes they just look like brainless thugs

Liam Coe
Rollingthunder is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2009, 15:52
  #405 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sometimes they just look like brainless thugs
... and sometimes that look is aspirational for them!

Lafite
61 Lafite is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2009, 00:54
  #406 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Spain or Thailand
Age: 51
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the issue is getting exaggerated. We have bars and clubs near the Chiang Mai airport (VTCC) which draw attention to their establishment by projecting lasershows in the sky being the airport within a 2 mile distance. I get struck all the time and I am more worried about fireworks getting into my prop than getting struck by harmless, low powered key chain lasers or even laser projections.

There are laser shows in the clubs crossing the visitors eye, too. Just the time of exposure to the eye is so short (and in an aircraft so much shorter due to higher speed) that it wouldn't harm.

There is no way anyone could keep a laser directed to your eye in an aircraft for a significant time so it could do harm. (At least not with commonly available lasers).

Everyone who doesn't believe it, go to a club with a laser show and see for your self.

Much a do about nothing. Again another way of making a dumb kid a criminal one.
rokami93 is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2009, 03:16
  #407 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Manchester
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The issue definitely is not exaggerated, and no pilot should say otherwise! Lasers can be dangerous if improperly used and the greatest danger is from beams projected directly into the eye. These can be focused by the lens (in the eye) into a very small and powerful spot capable of burning the retina and blinding people. The rules and regulations on public laser shows and displays differ from country to country although most countries follow the IEC-825 regulations. In the USA laser projection equipment needs a 'variance' and each show must be reported and have a 'site variance' issued by the CDRH. In Canada public shows and displays must be reported to the Radiation Protection Bureau in Ottawa. Before you can plan a public laser show, you have to check with the authorities having jurisdiction over radiation protection and health in your area. In laser shows
there are two main types of beam effects, static and dynamic. Static beams are usually turned on an off and may be bounced from mirrors to create a beam matrix or sculpture in the air. Dynamic beam effects are moving beams that may include sheets, fans, cones or blades of light moving above and through the audience.
 The audience exposure is brief and of negligible power, and effect to the observer eye. -Obviously designed that way, if you blind the audience they are not going to be able to see and appreciate the show! Unlike a show where the beams are fast moving, or defused, a laser attack on an aircraft in flight is a deliberate attempt to keep the laser beam stationary on the aircraft for a protracted time and does at the very least cause flash blindness if you are unlucky enough to be on the receiving end., it’s a clear interference with the safe conduct of the aircraft and the practice should not be condoned in anyway. Any laser directed at an aircraft even if it is from a show should be reported.
Cubbie is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2009, 05:51
  #408 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
rokami93
I think the issue is getting exaggerated.
Whatever you as a 300 hr PPL think, it's a real problem to professional pilots in many parts of the world.

The risk of eye injury is only one of the dangers.

Loss of night vision even temporary is dangerous, especially to police/EMS helicopters at low level over cities.
Bronx is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2009, 21:05
  #409 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Burgess Hill
Age: 41
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its happened to me just a couple of months ago!

Mindless
wannabefemalepilot is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2009, 22:13
  #410 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: France
Posts: 2,315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rokami93
I think the issue is getting exaggerated.
I think you're simply missing a point.
More and more yobs are getting hold of the same kind of high-power l@sers that are used for 'l@ser shows' etc. (which CAN be handheld and battery powered) and think it's "fun" pointing them at low-flying aircraft and helicopters.
And we're NOT talking about what you call "harmless, low powered key chain l@sers".
And with helicopters in particular, it's not that difficult to "hold the beam on the target".
And with helicopters in particular, with plexiglass canopies "crazed" with a myriad minute scratches and cracks, lighting it up with a l@sers means rendering it opaque...

So please, rokami, find out what's going on, before you post like you did...

CJ
ChristiaanJ is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2009, 11:26
  #411 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Spain or Thailand
Age: 51
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cubbie
These can be focused by the lens (in the eye) into a very small and powerful spot capable of burning the retina and blinding people.
For how long do you think you can reasonably focus the laser to the the eye of a pilot in an aircraft flying with a speed of 230 kts or 440 km/h, 1000 m above? You fly with a speed of 120 m/s and what could the be size of the laser to hit your eye?

It will pass for a fraction of a second, and it distracts, disturbs or whatsoever, but it doesn't harm. At least not that much that it justifies to put an 18 year old to jail.

Originally Posted by ChristiaanJ
And with helicopters in particular, it's not that difficult to "hold the beam on the target".
You are right on that, especially for pilots of helicopters flying at night with scratched canopies it can be annoying. And please, don't get me wrong: I don't think it is good, excuseable or any better because it is more of an issue to a helicopter pilot at night. Btw, if you fly with a scratched canopy it will also be very annoying flying against the sun, so I would work on that.

Nevertheless, the cases I have read so far they explained a scenario where an airline pilot in its cockpit called the attention to the police. The police then flew right to the area where the lasers were detected and followed them. If they were worried at all that they could risk their life or loose control of their helicopter, they wouldn't have opted for this way of chasing down the elements of crime?

Originally Posted by christiaanJ
I think you're simply missing a point.
Maybe you missed it: my point is that the issue is exaggerated, not wrong. Something needs and should be done about it, but I don't think it is that dangerous that it justifies to lock up a stupid kid with criminals.

Originally Posted by Bronx
Whatever you as a 300 hr PPL think, it's a real problem to professional pilots in many parts of the world.
I didn't take the time to look up your qualifications, but I am quite sure no one has ever lost control of the aircraft because of a laser, not even you although it seems you get irritated quite easily.

Again, don't get me wrong: it is stupid to la-ser aircraft. As much as I hate it when kids pressed all the buttons of the elevator I am hopping in and this way making it stop on every floor before I can get out again. But it is not that dangerous that you have to declare a stupid kid a criminal one and lock it up with criminals.
rokami93 is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2009, 15:57
  #412 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
rokami93
Nevertheless, the cases I have read so far they explained a scenario where an airline pilot in its cockpit called the attention to the police. The police then flew right to the area where the l@sers were detected and followed them. If they were worried at all that they could risk their life or loose control of their helicopter, they wouldn't have opted for this way of chasing down the elements of crime?
Try reading the very first post that started this thread and the appeal court decision in post #82.

It's not the only laser v helicopter incident mentioned in the thread, just one example.

B.
Bronx is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2009, 21:23
  #413 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Esher, Surrey
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another report- an air ambulance

BBC report
Laser 'blinds' air ambulance crew

The lives of an air ambulance crew and a seriously injured man were put at risk by someone shining a laser pen at the pilot as he was trying to land.
Warwickshire and Northamptonshire Air Ambulance said a high-powered beam had obscured the flight instruments and the pilot's view a number of times.
The aircraft was carrying a man, 37, from Kent who had fallen 29ft (8.8m) off scaffolding in Leicestershire.
It managed to land safely at University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire.

'Serious matter'
The ambulance service said a laser pen had been shone by someone sitting in a car parked close to the hospital's landing pad at about 1500 GMT on Wednesday.
It was shone into the helicopter cockpit while it was landing and again when it was taking off, the service said.
Steve Porter, air operations manager said: "This is a really serious matter.
"Not only is this childish prank putting lives at risk as it is difficult for the pilots to see, but it also adds valuable time on to a life saving mission as we try to land the helicopter and transfer seriously ill patients to further care."
beamender99 is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2009, 21:31
  #414 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Manchester
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The green lasers you can buy on ebay for 50bucks, with a range of 12000 to 25000ft fall into the Class III category, and generally are powered from 5–500 mW. Lasers in this category can cause permanent eye damage with exposures of 1/100th of a second or less depending on the strength of the laser, thus protective eyewear is recommended when direct beam viewing of Class III lasers. 1/100th of a second is faster than the eye blink reflex, there by the laser will cause damage to your retina before your natural blink reflex to protect the eye can kick in.-A fraction of a sec and your are blinded, that’s all it takes. If you think that’s exaggerated and wont do any damage to your eye, that’s your call there is plenty of data available if you do the research, I would prefer to err on the side of safety.
Cubbie is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2009, 21:45
  #415 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Livingston, West Lothian
Age: 79
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Laser shining and bricks on rails

I have personally never understood why anyone caught doing this sort of thing is not charged with attempted murder. These people surely should understand the potential seriousness of doing such things.
sparry is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2009, 05:15
  #416 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rokami93, by your comments and general attitude I take it that you have never been on the receiving end of a laser illumination. As for making this dumb kid a criminal, I believe that he was one already. If he had admitted the offence and did not have a criminal background then he would have been entitled to a caution. His 'background' is taken into account as is the nature of the offence such as was it a single ilumination or a sustained one. I don't know many helicopters that travel at 230kts so you must be referring to airplanes. Most airplanes are hit on final approach when there speed is relatively low, their airframe ''dirty' and their glidepath predictable. They are hit at a time when they at a critical stage of flight, with very few options! The people that target Police helicopters do not give a quick 1/1000 of a second sweep, that is just the attention getter, they continue to target the cockpit. The effects of sunlight on a scratched or dirty canopy is very different from that of a laser. Laser illuminations tend to happen at night where the laser will saturate the receptors of the eye and obscure the background detail (limited though that information is anyway). Sunlight does not refract around the cockpit like shards of glass as lasers do. When we are illuminated or called to an area where illuminations are reported we assess the risk to ourselves. I have made decision in the past to not attempt to apprehend the perpetrators because the risk to ourselves was too great (low cloud/viz, local hazards and geography of the area). By your arguement firemen should never go into burning buildings to rescue people because they are at risk! This issue has been highlighted in the press and other media to inform people of the dangers they are imposing on others by their actions. Anyone who ignores such information is only portraying themselves as a danger to others. Please remember also that the reckless endangement of an aircraft is an offence.
anonythemouse is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2009, 09:47
  #417 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As someone who has been targeted several times by lasers I am pleased to see that one idiot has been removed from society, allbeit temporarily. It is sad though that he comes from the small village where my parents live.

BTW, does anyone know why the "a" in l a s e r becomes "@"??
10002level is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2009, 09:58
  #418 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Spain or Thailand
Age: 51
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by anonymouse
Rokami93, by your comments and general attitude I take it that you have never been on the receiving end of a laser illumination
Yes, I have had laser reflections on my canopy before. A bit further up I explained. Also, laser in a club where I went out, passed my eye more than once. This is far closer than sitting in an aircraft.

Originally Posted by anonymouse
His 'background' is taken into account as is the nature of the offence such as was it a single ilumination or a sustained one
I didn't want to make a statement or judge on a single case which I don't know and cannot evaluate. My statement was more of a general nature and aimed to other forum participants who seem to be in favor of lynching.

Originally Posted by anonymouse
They are hit at a time when they at a critical stage of flight, with very few options! The people that target Police helicopters do not give a quick 1/1000 of a second sweep, that is just the attention getter, they continue to target the cockpit.
That is, indeed, nasty and stupid. But I guess we have make a difference between guys blinding police helicopters to keep them away from doing their job and a bunch of stupid kids trying to aim at passenger aircraft on their approach.

Originally Posted by anonymouse
By your arguement firemen should never go into burning buildings to rescue people because they are at risk!
Anon, let's carefully balance the reasons and awaited outcome for the doings of a fireman who knows that there is someone about to die in a burning house if he doesn't get in and rescues him and on the other side an eager policeman in his 3 million dollar helicopter and 500 l of fuel over residential areas chasing kids which make the stupid intent to reach the eye of an airline captain in his cockpit are completely different stories.
  • What is the probability that someone gets harmed when kids are pointing with a laser on a landing aircraft? - Near zero.
  • How much harm will we cause to a kid and to public interest chasing it down in a 3-million-dollar-helicopter? -Maybe 2000 Bucks for the helicopter and 20-60K for prosecution and jail time which we could have used for education.?
If our only answer to idiocy is punishment and jail, we will eventually end up like the US where an explosion in inmate numbers in recent years means that although the US makes up 5% of the total global population, it now accounts for 25% of the world's prisoners. If it goes on like that, they will eventually end up locking up themselves.

Originally Posted by 10002leve
It is sad though that he comes from the small village where my parents live.
Would it be any better for aviation if the fool would come from a big city a bit further away from your parents' house?

Originally Posted by 10002leve
BTW, does anyone know why the "a" in l a s e r becomes "@"??
Google for A S E suppression filters or read this thread. It has been answered a few times before. Your question reflects typical lack of knowledge, lack of respect and disregard of netiquette. Would you lock yourself up now for a while, please?

Last edited by rokami93; 19th Dec 2009 at 10:11.
rokami93 is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2009, 18:08
  #419 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi. I wondered if I might ask a question. I've come across a user on YouTube who is filming air traffic at night. She believes that they are in fact "morphing fake planes" piloted by extraterrestrials. It is clearly obvious in her videos that they are actually common aircraft and it has been shown that she lives very close to several airports, as she once posted her full name and address and invited people to come and see the "UFO's" for themselves.

In her latest video you can clearly hear her tell her children to "light up" what is obviously a plane with lasers. At one point you can actually hear the engine and she states that it is actually "fake noise". People pointed out that it is illegal to point lasers at aircraft and she promptly deleted the video, but not before I and a few others managed to download it. Should we report her and attach a copy of the video? You don't actually see the lasers, so I'm not sure how to proceed.

Oh, in addition to this she has also flashed aircraft with high intensity lights.
NautilusT is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2009, 18:30
  #420 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rokami93. The laser that you refer to in the night club would have been tested and cleared for such use. Its NOHD (Nominal Ocular Hazard Distance) would have been calculated and passed as safe for such use. The lasers we are being targetted with are far more powerful. When the laser reflected around your canopy were you travelling from A to B or remaining in the area to carry out your lawful vocation? You see, if we get called to any area due to laser activity against aircraft at our local airport the 'offence' has already been committed and what we are doing is our job in apprehending the offenders. The aircraft at our local airport are targetted at a critical stages of flight (final approach). Are the the crew and passengers not entitled to the protection of the law when such a dangerous act is carried out against them? If a person on the ground hinders a police officer in the course of his duty do you not consider it appropriate for them to be arrested and subjected to due process? We have a legal right to be where we are doing what we do, the perpetrators of laser illuminations are breaking the law! Its not as if they haven't been given warning of the danger that laser illumination poses or warned that it is a criminal offence. They have, with full knowledge of the facts, decided to stick 2 fingers up and defy the law and should be dealt with as any other person is when challenging the law. Maybe you have only experienced laser illumination on one occassion but the industry faced with it on a daily basis and individuals subjected to it weekly. From your comment on my analogy of the fireman and the burning building do I take it that you do not consider the passengers of an aircraft and the crew to be in danger. One day, one of these idiots is going to cause a catostrophic accident resulting in the loss of life! Maybe we should refrain from sending Armed Response Police to incidents involving firearms as long as the person who has committed an offence isn't doing it any more? Offenders who end up in jail for this offence will (typically) have a criminal record already, have denied the offence when challenged and shown little or no remorse for their actions, they basically don't give a sh1t! You sound like a social worker or idealist. Ask any Police pilot if he would prefer to end the year with 100 successful arrests for laser illumination or no arrests because no one has carried out the act, I know that I would vote for the latter, as would all those in my unit.

Last edited by anonythemouse; 19th Dec 2009 at 18:35. Reason: Spulling Mistook
anonythemouse is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.