![]() |
Originally Posted by Miles Magister
(Post 11611636)
I am left wondering why the crew used the nosewheel steering to take a high speed turn off when they had directional control issues. Why di d they not just run long in a straight line?
|
Originally Posted by Porrohman
(Post 11611744)
Aviation Herald is reporting that another United B38M suffered a runway excursion and main gear collapse at Houston today;
Source; https://avherald.com/h?article=515e3618&opt=0 Just a coincidence or is there a common cause? |
The Max does have cat3B capability. Customer option on the NG that I flew previously. Interesting the HGS with the same operator is not certified for cat3B so is either modes cleared or HGS stowed dependent on crew choice. Beware pprune disinformation. I have no idea what happened in this instance nor whether United have cat3B authorization but would be surprised if they didn’t. I am a current instructor on type.
|
Upthread it was mentioned that UAL only had nine planes with the HGS ?...If so I would think that the CAT would be restricted to what's allowed w/o it for commonality purposes across that fleet...B
|
UAL uses the HUD for cat3b capability.
|
Originally Posted by Sailvi767
(Post 11612196)
UAL uses the HUD for cat3b capability.
|
Originally Posted by GlobalNav
(Post 11612417)
Is it 1 new thing for HGS to be certified for Cat3b? It always used to be Cat3a, I’m pretty sure because it does not contribute to the the automatic rollout. It could be used to monitor rollout, but does it now provide Cat3b rollout steering guidance?
One strange HUD issue at my airline years ago. They required all approaches with the RVR below 4000 to be coupled if available unless the RVR was below 1200 in which case you were required to hand fly. Never made a lot of sense to me. |
UAL doesn’t do Cat 3B on the 737. None of the NG’s have a HUD. A handful of the MAX’s do. It’s not approved for use and is being progressively removed from those aircraft.
|
Originally Posted by Verbal Kint
(Post 11612732)
UAL doesn’t do Cat 3B on the 737. None of the NG’s have a HUD. A handful of the MAX’s do. It’s not approved for use and is being progressively removed from those aircraft.
|
Originally Posted by Verbal Kint
(Post 11612732)
UAL doesn’t do Cat 3B on the 737. None of the NG’s have a HUD. A handful of the MAX’s do. It’s not approved for use and is being progressively removed from those aircraft.
|
If the pilots aren't trained for it, its definitely not an aid to flight safety, quite the contrary :E
|
Why don’t they do CAT 3B? I don’t know - very rarely required on the line, & something else to have to train I guess. They do CAT 3A though.
|
Originally Posted by STBYRUD
(Post 11612744)
If the pilots aren't trained for it, its definitely not an aid to flight safety, quite the contrary :E
|
As I said before I am a current simulator instructor on the NG and Max. I am not authorized to say who I work for. For clarification the customer has the HGS on NG and Max on the LHS and it is sop to use it. Further complication with cat 3. NG authorized for cat3a with HGS. Max authorised for cat3b but no HGS allowed. This may be a regulator driven issue and I am not sure why. The Fail Operational autopilot has Rollout mode and the root cause of the above runway excursions may have something to do with that or not as I am just speculating.
|
Originally Posted by 1southernman
(Post 11612128)
Upthread it was mentioned that UAL only had nine planes with the HGS ?...If so I would think that the CAT would be restricted to what's allowed w/o it for commonality purposes across that fleet...B
|
WASHINGTON (Sept. 26, 2024) — The National Transportation Safety Board Thursday issued urgent safety recommendations to The Boeing Company and the Federal Aviation Administration in response to the potential for a jammed or restricted rudder control system on some 737 airplanes.
NTSB Issues Urgent Safety Recommendations on Boeing 737 Rudder System |
Investigators found evidence of moisture in both actuators, which failed testing. Collins Aerospace subsequently determined that a sealed bearing was incorrectly assembled during production of the actuators, leaving the unsealed side more susceptible to moisture that can freeze and limit rudder system movement. |
Two of the NTSB's four Urgent Safety Recommendations are addressed to Boeing.
|
Originally Posted by ATC Watcher
(Post 11741890)
But then it is a Collins issue not really a Boeing one .
I've seen your car, ATC Watcher, and so, when the old Ferrari Stradale breaks down you'll be straight down to Ferrari when the electric motor goes U/S - you don't care that YASA actually makes the motor! :ok: PS For anyone from YASA legal dept reading this, that's just a random, made-up, illustrative case and is in no way a slight on your ground-breaking products!!!!! And there is an aviation link too as a new world record for all-electric flight of 300.14 kts was set in November 2021 by a YASA-powered aircraft - breaking the previous record by a mere 114.7 kts. And there was a time-to-height record thrown in for good measure!!!!!! |
Seattle Times says Collins identified 353 actuators with the faulty seal assembly delivered since 2017. But only 9 are in the US, all are with United, and all have been replaced. So that is all right, we can relax.
The Boeing fix is for both pilots to apply maximum force to the rudder pedals until the rudder 'unsticks'. What happens when it comes free appears to this SLF to be potentially problematic. Boeing knows of two incidents with stuck rudder pedals from 2019: did these incidents result from failure of the same actuator, and if so why was nothing done about it? |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 00:27. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.