PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rumours & News (https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news-13/)
-   -   "US drafts commercial airlines to support Afghan evacuation" (https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/642264-us-drafts-commercial-airlines-support-afghan-evacuation.html)

WHBM 22nd Aug 2021 14:27

"US drafts commercial airlines to support Afghan evacuation"
 
From the BBC :

Afghanistan: US drafts commercial airlines to support Afghan evacuation - BBC News

It seems that they aren't running commercial operators from Afghanistan, but from nearby points such as the Gulf, on transfer from the USAF. Which one would have thought was going on all along. Not apparent what, after a week or two, has changed.

wiggy 22nd Aug 2021 14:35

Given there was talk/report yesterday that the likes of Qatar briefly stopped accepting inbound refugees due to a lack of capacity maybe there’s now a need to get those evacuated out of the region ASAP.


STN Ramp Rat 22nd Aug 2021 18:00

This happens every day of the week, airlines like Omni Air survive on DOD work. A search of flights with a CMB ICAO designator or CAMBER callsign will show you the sort of places they fly to.

BEA 71 22nd Aug 2021 19:46

Arent the commercial airlines not part of the U.S. defence system ? It gives them some protection, I believe some airlines would not have survived without this umbrella.

wiggy 22nd Aug 2021 19:46

I’m sure there’s plenty of ongoing DOD work done but I guess notable/newsworthy aspect of this is that it appears it is only the third time in it’s history that CRAF as an entity has been activated.

Ties in with my recollection of aviating in the run up to both Gulf Wars (I think it was ) when it seemed half the civilian registered N reg traffic, especially 747s, over Europe were heading to and from the Gulf using call signs that weren’t ones you would normally associate with the livery…an operation on that scale certainly wasn’t something that happened everyday…

STN Ramp Rat 22nd Aug 2021 21:01

thats a fair point, I am surprised they felt it necessary to activate CRAF for 18 aircraft when the airlines would likely have provided them in the normal commercial way. I wonder if it’s a White House media thing, CRAF1 and 2 were on an entirely different scale.

procede 23rd Aug 2021 07:39

I'd guess this is more of a bureaucratic thing. It eliminates a lot of red tape and the need to negotiate terms.

Anti Skid On 23rd Aug 2021 07:42

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...lines-pentagon

It lists the carriers " The administration asked for three planes each from American Airlines, Atlas Air, Delta Air Lines and Omni Air; two from Hawaiian Airlines; and four from United Airlines."

Hartington 23rd Aug 2021 17:00

Won't insurance come into the equation somewhere? CRAF probably provides cover that normally isn't available for commercial airlines (although if they're not going to fly into Kabul.....?)

Flightmech 23rd Aug 2021 17:03

CRAF activation is different to day-to-day contracted flying for the military under a Camber (or previously Reach) call sign.

hoistop 1st Sep 2021 14:54

Does anyone know if CRAF operation is still civilian / ICAO rules operation or is that deemed "state aircraft operation"? From legal (and particularly insurance) viewpoint there might be a big difference.
(Been deeply involved in that mess few years ago, so I am curious.)

CargoOne 1st Sep 2021 19:21

it is under applicable FAA rules and they cannot be tasked flying into an active war/combat zone ie Kabul or Kandahar. Something like Alamaty, Tashkent, Qatar, Kuwait, Islamabad etc only. Dunno about insurance.


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:25.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.