PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rumours & News (https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news-13/)
-   -   Ryanair vs 3 fuel trucks, MLA (https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/639650-ryanair-vs-3-fuel-trucks-mla.html)

Max Angle 8th Apr 2021 17:33


The only downside was the unions still insisted on two operators to carry out aircraft movement by tug when the job can be done safely with just one.
Not only that, the two operators take twice as long to do the job as one at any other airport.

infrequentflyer789 9th Apr 2021 10:04

Yeah, but that's obviously because they are being much more careful and much safer which will be more cost effective in the long run because they won't be crashing aircraft.

Well, in theory they won't...

crunchynutter 10th Apr 2021 18:15

Moved three planes at work today, in total it took nearly two hours and minimum four people, 1 tug driver, 1 headset man, 1 brake rider and a spot man. That is just stand to stand, hangar or some other moves need wing/tail spotters, elf and go safely seem to have it over bean counters.

FlightDetent 11th Apr 2021 02:33

Tangent: For pilotless ramp positioning, do you guys need to start the APU (737/A320)? What are the guidelines for moving one with APU u/s?

crunchynutter 12th Apr 2021 16:34

We (the ground handler) cannot move a plane without starting the APU, if it is inop we have to call the engineers and they come out and work their magic, to be honest i think that as long as there is enough pressure in the accumulator (3000psi) they can monitor that and watch for the tug disappearing into the distance, but the insurers will not let us do that. I believe airport ops insist that an aircraft that has no power (APU inop) must have an airfield ranger escort tho what they are going to do if things go the shape of a pear is unknown


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:34.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.