RAF ops cause delay at Heathrow
|
Spooky ...
|
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
(Post 10665621)
Spooky ...
|
Originally Posted by UAV689
(Post 10665635)
I thought those flying Landrovers have left Northolt...
Conveniently captured by Heathrow's radar tracker (not today's flight, but recent). |
RAF:
“This flight was coordinated with Heathrow ATC but had to extend by a few minutes to complete its sortie. The minor delays caused to civilian air traffic are regretted.” At least four British Airways flights and one Virgin Atlantic flight were forced to divert to other London airports including Gatwick, Stansted and Luton. (Guardian quote) Regretted, you bet. Off the top of my head, at least USD 200K loss for extra fuel, crew costs and lost pax time. I'd guess VS had to move a fresh crew to LGW as the flight from LAX would have exceed max. crew time. VS announced to SLF it had only 5-10 mins fuel. I'd assume that was over and above the 30 min. reserve, if they ate into the latter, they'd have to declare fuel emergency - or not? |
Originally Posted by Gegenbeispiel
(Post 10665707)
At least four British Airways flights and one Virgin Atlantic flight were forced to divert to other London airports including Gatwick, Stansted and Luton. (Guardian quote)
|
From the story in the Graun:
RAF statement: “This [RAF Northolt] flight was coordinated with Heathrow ATC but had to extend by a few minutes to complete its sortie. The minor delays caused to civilian air traffic are regretted.” One passenger on a Virgin Atlantic flight from Los Angeles that diverted to Gatwick shortly before it was due to land spoke of the “alarming” experience as the plane circled Heathrow. Anne Henry, a British TV producer, told the Mirror Online: “It was quite alarming when the captain announced after circling Heathrow for a while: ‘Ladies and gentlemen, we have about five to 10 minutes’ fuel left so we may need to divert to Gatwick.’” After the Virgin plane refuelled, it took off again for Heathrow and landed almost three hours late. Passengers were given a letter apologising for a “security incident” disrupting the flight. |
What sort of person says "only 5 or 10 minutes of fuel left" on a PA? Doesn't matter if they meant 5 minutes before needing to divert and land with reserves, it's a stupid and aggravating statement.
If I'm going to give a reason for diverting it'll be along the lines of "unknown delay", "airspace closed", "weather", or "ATC told us to". Many of my colleagues seem blissfully unaware that a sizable proportion of our passengers hate flying with a vengeance and talking about fuel (specifically the lack of it) is insensitive in the extreme to someone who's already nervous. |
Originally Posted by Fursty Ferret
(Post 10665856)
What sort of person says "only 5 or 10 minutes of fuel left" on a PA? .
|
Originally Posted by Fursty Ferret
(Post 10665856)
What sort of person says "only 5 or 10 minutes of fuel left" on a PA?
|
Originally Posted by MATELO
(Post 10665865)
an Honest one?
TARS: 90 percent. Cooper: 90 percent? TARS: Absolute honesty isn’t always the most diplomatic nor the safest form of communication with emotional beings. Cooper: Okay, 90 percent it is |
Originally Posted by SMT Member
(Post 10665872)
The sort who incorrectly thought his or her passengers were not complete morons armed with a social medie device?
Poor choice of words. It’s what a pilot would say, but on the PA it becomes a near disaster. |
If that's what he said, maybe the words 'till we have to divert' or similer were missing. Anything for better copy!
|
It's quite possible the passenger has paraphrased this a bit.
Say we might get a bit low on fuel if we keep waiting here, so we're going to divert to Gatwick; it's only 5 or 10 minutes away, and some people's minds might create a slightly different perception |
Maybe the "security incident" involved a Shadow R1 or BN Defender type aircraft (possibly operating out of RAF Northolt), that may have been tracking/orbiting over a person of particular interest near Heathrow relating to national security/terror related incidents...? Maybe this is why nothing specific has been stated because it could be an ongoing operation?
Food for thought. |
I'm struggling to believe that a Captain would announce to passengers that "we have about five to 10 minutes’ fuel left so we may need to divert to Gatwick". If you want to cause instant terror that's a good way of doing it, especially when it's pretty obvious that to get to Gatwick and land within the next 10 minutes is probably impossible.
PPrune's resident experts would immediately know what he meant. Many others would guess. But it's a very ambiguous announcement if you know nothing about how airlines do things. |
My original post did carry the caveat that it came from the Daily Mail. I'm afraid it was even worse, the Wail was quoting the Daily Hirror:
British TV producer Anne Henry told The Mirror how her Virgin Atlantic flight from Los Angeles was diverted to Gatwick due to a lack of fuel. She told Mirror Online: 'It was quite alarming when the captain announced after circling Heathrow for a while, "Ladies and gentlemen we have about five to ten minutes" fuel left so we may need to divert to Gatwick'. |
"I thought those flying Landrovers have left Northolt"
Current rumour was it was a "Mercedes" can anyone check on Flightradar24 |
Originally Posted by sky9
(Post 10666227)
"I thought those flying Landrovers have left Northolt"
Current rumour was it was a "Mercedes" can anyone check on Flightradar24 And the lady involved was Allison, not Mercedes. :O |
What was the aircraft in question?
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:13. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.