SpaceX Starship Explodes
I didn't see this elsewhere on the site - a full pressurization test of the prototype Starship caused it to blow its top yesterday.
- Ed |
Originally Posted by cavuman1
(Post 10623640)
I didn't see this elsewhere on the site - a full pressurization test of the prototype Starship caused it to blow its top yesterday.
|
Looks like R2D2 when he got zapped in Return of the Jedi!
|
It looks much earlier than that...more like "Lost In Space".
|
Thunderbirds are not go.
|
They've got a real 1950's retro look with that thing.
|
Looks like an old English Electric Lightning stood on its tail.
|
Is it April 1st? You don't mean to say he's spent money on that? Christ, does anyone have his email address? I've got plenty of sh it ideas I could sell to him.
|
Originally Posted by RickNRoll
(Post 10623827)
They've got a real 1950's retro look with that thing.
For me personally it was the synchronised twin booster landings from the heavy that really gave me goosebumps, this was how future rocket ships were meant to be. Starship is just a bit shinier - which may just be that after reusing a few falcons without repainting they've just decided why bother painting in the first place (they don't look all nice and white after the first time). SpaceX didn't do tail-landing first of course - DC-X beat em by a long way on that, unfortunately that sort of evolved into Blue Origin which isn't so much a 50s retro look as 70s Flesh Gordon, which is not a good look unless you are deliberately doing satire... |
|
Poor old Muskie, what with his Cybertruk fail, wasn't a good day for him...
|
The Cyber truck fail was the driver's side window being smashed ?
Video I saw had one of the designers throw a large ball bearing at it, right after he hit the cold rolled steel door with a sledge hammer. Musk produces things instead of just talking about them. I respect him for that. |
Originally Posted by packapoo
(Post 10624346)
Poor old Muskie, what with his Cybertruk fail, wasn't a good day for him...
No nuclear bomb shelter? |
Originally Posted by TWT
(Post 10624360)
Musk produces things instead of just talking about them. I respect him for that.
|
Surely that metal cylinder is a containment vessel, rather than anything launchable. Why it has the cartoon tailfins, I don't know, but maybe there's something about wind deflection on the ground. Musk is another self-absorbed, poorly socialised techbro, but he does have some real achievements and isn't a fool.
|
Originally Posted by UltraFan
(Post 10624511)
I'm with you on that! The Hyperloop tunnel from his office to LAX is working brilliantly despite the skeptics whining! And the Hyperloop from Moscow to London is so popular that last time I tried to buy a ticket I just couldn't get a seat. And his fantastic submarine that saved all those boys in Thailand! A truly brilliant man who is worthy to be in the same Pantheon as Charles Ponzi and Bernie Madoff.
It was an intentional test to destruction... |
Originally Posted by OldnGrounded
(Post 10623722)
It looks like it would make a decent silo, if the space trip thing doesn't work out.
To everyone complaining about what it looks like - it's a test vehicle, designed to experiment with manufacturing techniques quickly and cheaply and then get destroyed during testing (although not quite this early). Why would they waste time and money making it pretty? SpaceX had already decided not to fly this one and (as far as I can tell) they've also decided not to bother flying its successor - they're moving right on to getting the third prototype built. With that said, the final one is also expected to have a shiny stainless steel finish, on the basis that this works as well as white paint (for keeping it from warming up in the sun) and weighs less. |
Originally Posted by Slatye
(Post 10624689)
To everyone complaining about what it looks like . . .
|
Originally Posted by Nige321
(Post 10624645)
I suggest you read up on some of Musk's achievments,
|
Originally Posted by UltraFan
(Post 10624958)
I'd rather. Chew. Glass. Would be a very short read, though. His spectacular failures, on the other hand, are a fascinating, if a bit lengthy, story.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:49. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.