Not at all Cough, I'm on exactly the same page. Although a Norwegian flight number, not much point in examining Norwegian SOP's and fuel jettison procedures on the B787 when the incident occurred with a Hi-Fly A340.
I can't see the need to have the thread hijacked with a sermon on corporate responsibility, there's lots of other corners of the internet for the self-righteous. |
Well alright then, if you want to play that game, the correct thread title should have been:
"****ty Rolls Royce engine design and manufacture causes fuel spill at MCO" |
Originally Posted by Two's in
(Post 10511351)
Well alright then, if you want to play that game, the correct thread title should have been:
"****ty Rolls Royce engine design and manufacture causes fuel spill at MCO" |
Originally Posted by Two's in
(Post 10511351)
Well alright then, if you want to play that game, the correct thread title should have been:
"****ty Rolls Royce engine design and manufacture causes fuel spill at MCO" I'm pretty sure that most here are able to appropriately apportion responsibility for incidents like this, regardless of headline wording. |
Originally Posted by rog747
(Post 10511382)
Ahem - cough....on the culprit A340 it was a ****ty US/French engine actually...
|
Originally Posted by golfyankeesierra
(Post 10510788)
I wonder whom the check for the cleanup will be sent to. I guess that will be Norwegian.. |
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
(Post 10511443)
And, given that the fuel dumping wasn't engine related, who manufactured them is irrelevant.
Think about it’s context.... |
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:52. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.