|
QF26 shutdown diversion
Haneda to Sydney. Contained engine failure followed by significant vibration after shutdown divert to Cairns. Any news?? |
Mate, you’re telling the story! |
How much longer can they persist with these things. I’ll never understand it.
Few dozen 787s deferred and deferred. While everyone else raced to phase out old ****boxes. What am I missing here! |
Originally Posted by PoppaJo
(Post 10469556)
How much longer can they persist with these things. I’ll never understand it.
Few dozen 787s deferred and deferred. While everyone else raced to phase out old ****boxes. What am I missing here! |
Originally Posted by PoppaJo
(Post 10469556)
How much longer can they persist with these things. I’ll never understand it.
Few dozen 787s deferred and deferred. While everyone else raced to phase out old ****boxes. What am I missing here! 3 years old. And did that just recently fly again - to HK? |
Some how me things they may have managed to changes the engines and other dangly bits a few times since it was purchased in the early 90's. The age of the airframe is irrelevant.
|
Originally Posted by PoppaJo
(Post 10469556)
While everyone else raced to phase out old ****boxes.
|
The QF 744s are hardly old...this aircraft VH-OJU being the oldest at 19 years old. The BA ones are 20 - 29 years old, the VS ones are 18-23 years, the Corsair ones are 27 years old. Theres more issues with the B787 and A350 engines than these old girls.
|
Originally Posted by clipstone1
(Post 10470152)
The QF 744s are hardly old...this aircraft VH-OJU being the oldest at 19 years old.
|
Originally Posted by Dee Vee
(Post 10470663)
They are old in terms of tech, cabin pressure, humidity, noise, IFE, efficiency, etc, etc, etc... Should have been put out to pasture years ago.
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 17:55. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.