A220 Bird strike
|
Originally Posted by underfire
(Post 10259984)
Yes, A220!
|
Originally Posted by Mad (Flt) Scientist
(Post 10259999)
Well, sort of. If you look closely, it still says "Bombardier CS300" on the side of the nose ....
|
|
Calling it the A220 was with a bit of sarcasm.
Aside from that, isnt this the first one? |
Originally Posted by underfire
(Post 10260102)
Calling it the A220 was with a bit of sarcasm.
Aside from that, isnt this the first one? |
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
(Post 10260032)
As does the Type Certificate and indeed everything related to airworthiness. Just calling it an Airbus doesn't make it one. :O
|
That’ll teach ‘em for making it so damn quiet...😏 |
Ah, that would be the CS300AKAA220 then... Nice bi-partisan solution, there! |
Wait, looking closer at this image from the article, nothing makes sense....all the separations in the fuselage, and this engine is way out of place....there is a hell of a lot of fuselage between the door and the wing...notice where "Baltic" is on the fuselage vs the image......WTF!
Hell, at this point, I am not even certain they had a bird strike.....unless it crumple the fuselage back about 10 seats! https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....3692a9b6e4.jpg an impressive profile, especially the tail section....entire top is level, an the apu extends almost entirely beyond the vertical structure. https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....1fc022b07f.jpg |
I've never understood why Airbus didn't just call the CS100 the A100 and the CS300 the .... oh, hang on.
|
Originally Posted by evansb
(Post 10261053)
It is an effect of perception (angle of vision).
|
Looks like 4 individual bird strikes to me.
f |
Originally Posted by fleigle
(Post 10261790)
Looks like 4 individual bird strikes to me.
f |
Originally Posted by lomapaseo
(Post 10261887)
I can only see 3 on the nose near the vertical CL
|
Originally Posted by underfire
(Post 10261044)
Wait, looking closer at this image from the article, nothing makes sense....all the separations in the fuselage, and this engine is way out of place....there is a hell of a lot of fuselage between the door and the wing...notice where "Baltic" is on the fuselage vs the image......WTF!
.... |
Originally Posted by underfire
(Post 10261044)
Wait, looking closer at this image from the article, nothing makes sense....all the separations in the fuselage, and this engine is way out of place....there is a hell of a lot of fuselage between the door and the wing...notice where "Baltic" is on the fuselage vs the image......WTF!
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....3692a9b6e4.jpg Effect of a long lens or cropping, plus reflections of the open hold doors and right wing in the shiny white fuselage skin, not "separations" or creases. |
Originally Posted by bloom
(Post 10262019)
How about just one large bird bounced off radome hit again,split by the wipers and the third just blood trail ?
|
Effect of a long lens or cropping, plus reflections of the open hold doors and right wing in the shiny white fuselage skin, not "separations" or creases. |
why Airbus didn't just call the CS100 the A100 and the CS300 the .... |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:33. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.