One Hundred Ill on A380
The aircraft is being held away from the terminal at JFK.
See: 100 Ill on Emirates Flight - Ed :yuk: |
Statement from EK:
Statement: Emirates can confirm that about 10 passengers on #EK203 from Dubai to New York were taken ill. On arrival, as a precaution, they were attended to by local health authorities. All others will disembark shortly. The safety & care of our customers is our first priority. 10:18 AM - Sep 5, 2018 |
September is a month with "R" isn't it?
So one could have the huitres again? |
Did they have the steak or the fish for dinner?
|
From New York Mayor's spokesman Eric Phillips:
Flight started in Dubai and stopped in Mecca, which is experiencing a flu outbreak. Early indications point to that as a POSSIBILITY. More to come [url=https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:bzpIeEPhCEAJ:[ame]https://twitter.com/EricFPhillips/status/1037340969065177088+&cd=7&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=u s][/ame]https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:bzpIeEPhCEAJ: |
Local New York media now reporting that the 10 people sent to Jamaica Hospital were 7 crew and 3 pax.
https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.gmf...2d161b95ec.jpg Picture by passenger Larry Coben - Twitter |
Originally Posted by Airbubba
(Post 10242049)
From New York Mayor's spokesman Eric Phillips:
https://twitter.com/EricFPhillips/status/1037340969065177088+&cd=7&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=u s]https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:bzpIeEPhCEAJ:https://twitter.com/EricFPhillips/st...&ct=clnk&gl=us |
Originally Posted by SMT Member
(Post 10242097)
EK203 is a direct DXB-JFK service, and according to FR24 that's exactly what it did today: https://www.flightradar24.com/data/f...ek203#1dc0a2a2
|
I must try out the airport in Mecca next time I'm out that way
|
Originally Posted by A320LGW
(Post 10242110)
I must try out the airport in Mecca next time I'm out that way
|
CDC reports it was 100 pax and crew...I wonder who speaks the truth? I know where I might look...
|
Originally Posted by Left Coaster
(Post 10242116)
CDC reports it was 100 pax and crew...I wonder who speaks the truth? I know where I might look...
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.gmf...f73bc98c95.jpg |
|
A similar event occurred in France yesterday. Pax and crew on a flight from Oran, Algeria were held when it arrived at Perpignan after a child was suspected of having cholera. She was taken to hospital for tests. There is a cholera epidemic in Algeria, with a number of deaths.
Details of everyone on board were taken before they were allowed to leave. The aircraft returned empty to Algeria to be cleaned and disinfected. |
More from the mayor's spokesman Eric Phillips:
All the passengers are off and have been evaluated. 19 sick. 10 to hospital and 9 refused medical attention. Health officials are processing tests now to determine the cause. Symptoms still pointing to the flu. |
Originally Posted by sitigeltfel
(Post 10242152)
A similar event occurred in France yesterday.....
The aircraft returned empty to Algeria to be cleaned and disinfected. |
Mass psychogenic illness, perhaps?
|
I've experienced something similar when I was cabin crew at a major Japanese airline: Flight from FCO to NRT, many PAX had eaten seafood before leaving. They were mostly seniors and elderly on their first trip to Europe after a long hard working life and no clue about food safety abroad (in Japan you can eat raw eggs and fish without a worry). I had 9 PAX in economy class with food poisoning...it was awful.
Noone quaranteened them or us, we just hoped the elderly would survive the 10+ hours of loosing liquids violently! So for this Emirates flight, perhaps the avaition authorities in the US are being somewhat overly cautious, to put it in a PC kind of way? |
Originally Posted by Frequent_Flyer
(Post 10242493)
......
Noone quaranteened them or us, we just hoped the elderly would survive the 10+ hours of loosing liquids violently! So for this Emirates flight, perhaps the avaition authorities in the US are being somewhat overly cautious, to put it in a PC kind of way? However, they are in a dilemma; it is fantastically unlikely that any one incident represents a serious risk to the wider population. But fantastically unlikely things always eventually happen - I don't have to tell that to pilots. My colleagues who work on emerging infectious disease tell me that 1. A pandemic that kills 100s of millions is inevitable, whether that will be next week or next decade no-one knows, but it is close to certain. 2. The massive increase in air-travel will be one of the primary drivers that will convert this pandemic from a nasty local flare-up that self limits, to a global catastrophe. |
Originally Posted by double_barrel
(Post 10242507)
Well, almost certainly the authorities are being over-cautious on this occasion.
However, they are in a dilemma; it is fantastically unlikely that any one incident represents a serious risk to the wider population. But fantastically unlikely things always eventually happen - I don't have to tell that to pilots. My colleagues who work on emerging infectious disease tell me that 1. A pandemic that kills 100s of millions is inevitable, whether that will be next week or next decade no-one knows, but it is close to certain. 2. The massive increase in air-travel will be one of the primary drivers that will convert this pandemic from a nasty local flare-up that self limits, to a global catastrophe. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 23:23. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.