PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rumours & News (https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news-13/)
-   -   FedEx MD-10 on fire at Fort Lauderdale airport (https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/586334-fedex-md-10-fire-fort-lauderdale-airport.html)

logansi 28th Oct 2016 22:07

FedEx MD-10 on fire at Fort Lauderdale airport
 
Video just posted show MD-10 on fire a Fort Lauderdale

https://youtu.be/Yu2NJc9_4ss

logansi 28th Oct 2016 22:10

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cv4xw-GWYAAg4HF.jpg

Airbubba 28th Oct 2016 22:13

Two ground widebody aircraft fires in one day? :eek:

giggitygiggity 28th Oct 2016 22:20

Three major incidents in 24 hours if you include Donald Guff and his minion!

Jet Jockey A4 28th Oct 2016 22:22

Plus one off the end of a runway... Things happen in threes they say.

mach2.6 28th Oct 2016 22:26

Yikes
 
N370FE from TV news chopper video

logansi 28th Oct 2016 22:30

2 Wide body likely Write-offs in one day

tdracer 28th Oct 2016 22:35

It doesn't take much to write-off an MD-10...

logansi 28th Oct 2016 22:36

Aircraft exploded after it stopped

https://imagr.eu/up/2BQFs_Cv405AyW8AAbMIV.jpg

Airbubba 28th Oct 2016 22:36

From a well placed source who has reported reliably in the past, the plane was FedEx 910, MEM-FLL landing on runway 10L.

Wind given when cleared to land was 050 at 18 gusts to 23. Later tower wind before landing was 050 at 14 gusts to 22.

The tower reported the left engine on fire, the aircraft off the runway by A4, debris on the runway.

Is this their first hull loss since the tragic mishap at NRT in 2009?

daelight 28th Oct 2016 22:38

Thank the deity she didn't roll..

YRP 28th Oct 2016 22:47


Originally Posted by tdracer (Post 9559795)
It doesn't take much to write-off an MD-10...

Either way, this sure looks like enough!

readywhenreaching 28th Oct 2016 22:50

live coverage: https://www.periscope.tv/w/1djxXEwljOEKZ#

jacdec.de

giggitygiggity 28th Oct 2016 23:22

This aircraft first flew in 1972, it was nearly 45 years old! This seems to be a landing mishap rather than 'an engine fire' as the TV coverage is focusing on. Interestingly though, it is also a GE CF-6 engine, like the 767 in Chicago earlier.

Surely this aircraft (and the other MD10s) should have been resigned to the bin years ago?

Airbubba 28th Oct 2016 23:31


Originally Posted by readywhenreaching (Post 9559806)

I don't think this narrative at jacdec.de makes any sense, PNS and FLL are not close to each other:


During cruiseflight, the aircraft experienced a catastrophic failure of its left engine. The pilots managed to make an emergency landing at Pensacola, FL.
2016-10-28 FedEx MD-10F gear collapse and fire on landing Ft. Lauderdale JACDEC

readywhenreaching 29th Oct 2016 00:07


I don't think this narrative at jacdec.de makes any sense, PNS and FLL are not close to each other:

Quote:
During cruiseflight, the aircraft experienced a catastrophic failure of its left engine. The pilots managed to make an emergency landing at Pensacola, FL.
2016-10-28 FedEx MD-10F gear collapse and fire on landing Ft. Lauderdale JACDEC
maybe it was because they're forced doing three things at once on this special day..

Airbubba 29th Oct 2016 00:19

Some of the chopper video shows a piece of the aircraft near the approach end of 10L. It is marked by an orange cone and looks to me like possibly part of a flap actuator and fairing. There is also a long dark streak on the left side of the runway.

Until today, I believe FedEx had gone over seven years without a mainline hull loss. I would definitely say that is a record for them. I don't believe they had gone over five years without a crash previously.

Is this possibly the seventh FedEx Mad Dog loss (two at MEM, SFS, SWF, EWR, NRT)? I've also heard rumors of a broken wing spar from a landing at ANC years ago.

tdracer 29th Oct 2016 00:27


Is this possibly the seventh FedEx Mad Dog loss (two at MEM, SFS, SWF, EWR, NRT)? I've also heard rumors of a broken wing spar from a landing at ANC years ago.
Airbubba - I don't think those were all MD-10s, at least one was an MD-11.
For those who might not know, roughly 20 years ago FedEx picked up a bunch of DC-10s and worked with MacDac to install updated flight decks on them - turning a DC-10 into an MD-10.
The engine was most likely a CF6-50, which I noted in the American 767 thread has a long history of uncontained turbine disc failures - there are several associated AD's which don't seem to have helped much...
While of the same general 'series', the CF6-80C2 on the American 767 is a very different engine relative to the CF6-50.
At any rate, not pleasant times in Cincinnati...

Airbubba 29th Oct 2016 00:35


Originally Posted by tdracer (Post 9559865)
Airbubba - I don't think those were all MD-10s, at least one was an MD-11.

I agree, that's why I used Mad Dog as a generic for the DC-10F, MD-10F and MD-11F. FedEx has crashed an occasional 727 and A300 over the years as well. But, I believe, no fatalities until the NRT MD-11 crash in 2009.

BobM2 29th Oct 2016 01:05


Originally Posted by tdracer (Post 9559865)
Airbubba - I don't think those were all MD-10s, at least one was an MD-11.
For those who might not know, roughly 20 years ago FedEx picked up a bunch of DC-10s and worked with MacDac to install updated flight decks on them - turning a DC-10 into an MD-10.
The engine was most likely a CF6-50, which I noted in the American 767 thread has a long history of uncontained turbine disc failures - there are several associated AD's which don't seem to have helped much...
While of the same general 'series', the CF6-80C2 on the American 767 is a very different engine relative to the CF6-50.
At any rate, not pleasant times in Cincinnati...

Be advised that the -80C2 is not immune:

https://aviation-safety.net/database...?id=20000922-0

https://aviation-safety.net/database...?id=19970906-1

https://aviation-safety.net/database...?id=20000607-1


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:38.


Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.