PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rumours & News (https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news-13/)
-   -   C-130 MAFFS air tanker goes down in South Dakota (https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/489436-c-130-maffs-air-tanker-goes-down-south-dakota.html)

fotoguzzi 2nd Jul 2012 05:10

C-130 MAFFS air tanker goes down in South Dakota
 
C-130 MAFFS air tanker went down in South Dakota

The article claims some survivors. The crash occurred northeast of Edgemont, South Dakota on the afternoon of 1 July while fighting the White Draw fire.

sevenstrokeroll 2nd Jul 2012 16:50

all three got out and are being treated at local hospital.

fotoguzzi 2nd Jul 2012 19:11

I hate to be contradictory, but the following story does not match the above post:

Family: Crew member of North Carolina cargo plane has died in crash while fighting forest fire - The Washington Post

con-pilot 2nd Jul 2012 20:21

This accident is a hard one to get any real facts on. I've heard reports that one to three crew members died to none. Also heard that three survivors have been taken to hospital, to just one was.

Ah well, we'll find out the whole story sooner or later. The more that made it, the better.

voyageur9 2nd Jul 2012 20:36

at least one dead
 
and the other seven MAFFS temporarily grounded. All eight had been activated given the multiple and large fires.

Apparently at least one of the pilots was killed.

Air Force C-130 crashes while fighting wildfire | Nation & World | The Seattle Times

The Ancient Geek 2nd Jul 2012 22:22

Is history being repeated ?, I seem to recall another (privately owned ?) C130 suffering structural failure while fighting forest fires in the USA a year or two ago.

Yankee Whisky 3rd Jul 2012 00:09

Fire fighting crashes
 
Does anyone have the numbers for typical 'g' loads incurred

when flying low over forest fires, including the wind generated

up- and downdrafts in hilly terrain? Would peak loads exceed acceptable

numbers for averting serious and/or fatal wing cracks ?

herkman 3rd Jul 2012 00:30

The other C130 lost was a very early ex USAF airplane which had been operated by the CIA and for a long period had no docuemented repair and service records.

Both wings detached from the centre section caused by joint failure.

Come a long way on centre section failures since then and I doubt if high G loadings if operated within the dash 1 handbook would cause a failure.

It a sad time for us all when our own kind is taken in such a brutal way.

However the USAF just like many Air Forces are under pressure not to over spend on servicing.

They are just about the same vintage as the RAF K models would be and however when fire fighting would not should normally achieve high G forces.

Sad day for us all and special thoughts to the families

Regards

Col

HercDriver 3rd Jul 2012 00:35

It was 2003..and yes it was privately owned

Crew is typically 6 for these missions.

BobM2 3rd Jul 2012 00:42

Here's the official briefing:


Panther 88 3rd Jul 2012 01:56

OMG. I'm sure LCOL Carver wanted to bang some heads together answering some of those ridiculous questions. Good job by him. Such a shame for this to happen doing a peacetime mission.

fotoguzzi 3rd Jul 2012 10:11

4 killed in C-130 plane crash | WCNC.com Charlotte

This sad new is from the city where the plane was based. As with every story so far, there are inconsistencies.

[Later:]
Confirmed:

N.C. Air National Guard Announces C-130 Crash Victims

From the above, the positions within the aircraft seem to include pilot and copilot (presumed), navigator, and flight engineer. From context, the two survivors may have operated the MAFFS equipment.

fotoguzzi 3rd Jul 2012 10:55

Plane leaving Charlotte to fight SD fires crashed | www.wsoctv.com

Another North Carolina source has this interesting statement:

The U.S. Forest Service (USFS) said the C-130 was following a BLM Air Supervision Module (ASM) plane which was engaged as the lead plane during the time of the crash. The ASM got caught in a downdraft while the C-130 was trailing it.
This is being investigated as a separate incident according to the USFS.

fotoguzzi 3rd Jul 2012 16:42

C-130 tankers to resume firefighting ops - Air Force News | News from Afghanistan & Iraq - Air Force Times

The remaining C-130 MAFFS tankers except for one from North Carolina are returning to action today.


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:12.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.