I've just sifted through the emergencies section of the UK RT Manual (CAP413, ed. 16) and there is zero mention of the word guard. The word does not exist in that document at all! I refuse to recognise its use and always use/say 121.5. |
Given the number of people crossing swords on this subject, one could be forgiven for believing it's from the French - "En Garde!". :p
|
In The UK
..............and I may be / am wrong.......
There was many moons ago about the late 80's/early 90's, as published in the supliments, the phrase 'All stations this frequency, stop transmitting X3, MAYDAY in progress' I believed this to be related to 121.5. Such call could be made by any ground or air station privy? Have I remembered right? That would kill the practice pan, all chatter, though there seemed none then, yet being a costal Ops guy I monitored 121.5 on the GTA on scan. |
And of course 'grammer' is spelled 'grammar'. Let's not go there.
Maybe D&D should have a QSL card designed, so every time they unequivocally identify one of the offenders, they can print and send one with only a few keystrokes..... |
I was given to understand that 243 was the Emergency Frequency however, because of various technical factors involving prorogation of radio waves and carriage of UHF, a VHF frequency was provided as a back up or 'guard' for the main [243]. I also remember somewhere in the distant past to the D&D cell one of the senior people there stating that it was preferable for a crew to initiate a practise Pan because it offered a way for a crew who were on the verge of a real Pan situation to avoid it. I don't know it that thought is still there.
Best Wishes |
I AM stupid..... should have seen this ages ago.
Of course 243.0 is exactly two times 121.5 ! Any technical reason that anybody knows of, like running off the same crystal? If one wanted to be pedantic, 243MHz isn't UHF, because 'formally' UHF doesn't start until 300MHz. But the answer is of course simply, that in aviation "118-137" is VHF and "225-400" is UHF. |
Inter-pilot air-to-air freq 123.45; and the use of he word "Guard"
For those PPRuNers wondering where the inter-pilot air-air freq 123.45 has its authority in aviation regulations, please check out the following references in Jepp World Wide Text. (Following 123.45 is the use of the word "Guard".)
A. 123.45 Jepp WWT ATC Pacific Page 9-10 7.1 GENERAL PROCEDURES ..... c. establish communications with and alert nearby aircraft by broadcasting, at suitable intervals: aircraft identification, flight level, position (including the ATS route designator or the track code, as appropriate) and intentions on the frequency in use and on 121.5 MHz (or, as a back-up, on the inter-pilot air-to-air frequency 123.45 MHz); 7.2 WEATHER DEVIATION PROCEDURES General …. b. establish communications with and alert nearby aircraft by broadcasting, at suitable intervals: aircraft identification, flight level, position (including ATS route designator or the track code) and intentions, on the frequency in use and on 121.5 MHz (or, as a back-up, on the inter-pilot air-to-air frequency 123.45 MHz); 7.3 PROCEDURES FOR STRATEGIC LATERAL OFFSETS IN OCEANIC AND REMOTE CONTINENTAL AIRSPACE …. NOTE 1: Pilots may contact other aircraft on the inter-pilot air-to-air frequency 123.45 MHz to coordinate offsets. 8.1 CONTINGENCY SCENARIOS (Pages 11-14) If considered necessary, alert nearby aircraft by (a) making maximum use of exterior lights; (b) broadcasting position, FL, and intentions on 121.5 MHz (as a backup, the VHF inter-pilot air-to-air frequency, 123.45 MHz, may be used). So as you can readily see, 123.45 is a legal ICAO inter-pilot air-to-air frequency. The UK, USA, EU an most developed countries are all signatories to the ICAO Aircraft Operations regulations which includes PANS-OPS, I believe. ~~~~~~~ B. Use of the word ‘Guard’. It is correct to state that the VHF freq 121.5 is called an Emergency or Distress frequency in the regulations. (see below) Jepp WWT EMERGENCY Page 1 INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION (ICAO) Extracted from the following ICAO publications: RULES OF THE AIR, ANNEX 2 2.3 DISTRESS FREQUENCIES 2.3.1 …. there is a need for designating a particular frequency or frequencies to be used in order that uniformity may be attained on a world-wide basis, and so that a guard may be maintained or set up by as many stations as possible including direction-finding stations, …..... 2.3.5 With respect to survival craft stations the following emergency / distress frequencies are provided: a. VHF — 121.5 MHz; b. UHF — 243.0 MHz; c. HF — 500 kHz, 2182 kHz, 8364 kHz. ... Jepp WWT EMERGENCY Page 3-4 5.2 RADIOTELEPHONY DISTRESS COMMUNICATIONS .... 1. The foregoing provisions may be supplemented by the following measures; a. the distress message of an aircraft in distress being made on the emergency frequency 121.5 MHz or another aeronautical mobile frequency, if considered necessary or desirable. Not all aeronautical stations maintain a continuous guard on the emergency frequency From the above references in the Jepp WWT ICAO regulations, the word ‘guard’ is used mainly to describe the actions of aviators and ground stations in listening out or ‘guarding’ Emergency frequencies for distress calls. Over the years, the emergency frequencies themselves have simply been referred to as ‘Guard Frequency’, because that is what you do; ‘guard’ the frequency. I hope this answers the questions posed with regard to the 123.45 inter-pilot air-to-air frequency and the use of the word ‘guard’ when referring to the emergency frequencies 121.5 and 243.0. Cheers. |
Fantastic post, thank you. Probably won't end the b******t though on here, they have nothing better to do than guard the thread.:ok:
|
Magnet77 : Join Date: Jul 2008 - Posts: 1
Inter-pilot air-to-air freq 123.45; and the use of he word "Guard" What a remarkable first post from a 'newcomer'. Many thanks, Madam or Sir, and my sincerest respects! Welcome! |
Just one small point, the text quoted appears to have been lifted from a regional procedure (albeit the Pacific!!) with links to Annex 10. From Annex 10 Vol II:
5.2.2.1.1.1 Aircraft on long over-water flights, or on flights over designated areas over which the carriage of an emergency locator transmitter (ELT) is required, shall continuously guard the VHF emergency frequency 121.5 MHz, except for those periods when aircraft are carrying out communications on other VHF channels or when airborne equipment limitations or cockpit duties do not permit simultaneous guarding of two channels. 5.2.2.1.1.2 Aircraft shall continuously guard the VHF emergency frequency 121.5 MHz in areas or over routes where the possibility of interception of aircraft or other hazardous situations exist, and a requirement has been established by the appropriate authority. 5.2.2.1.1.3 Aircraft on flights other than those specified in 5.2.2.1.1.1 and 5.2.2.1.1.2 should guard the emergency frequency 121.5 MHz to the extent possible. 5.2.2.1.1.4 The user of the air-to-air VHF communications channel shall ensure that adequate watch is maintained on designated ATS frequencies, the frequency of the aeronautical emergency channel, and any other mandatory watch frequencies. 5.2.2.1.2 Aeronautical stations shall maintain watch as required by the appropriate Authority. 5.2.2.1.3 Aeronautical stations shall maintain a continuous listening watch on VHF emergency channel 121.5 MHz during the hours of service of the units at which it is installed. An interesting use of the word guard. Aircraft are required to guard 121.5 whereas ground stations shall 'maintain a continuous listening watch'. I wonder what ICAO perceive as the difference between the two phrases? |
Guard Police Wrong - Official
From the latest GASIL:
Unauthorised radio transmissions? Having written the previous two articles, we became aware of some unauthorised transmissions recently heard, on two apparently separate occasions, on the emergency frequency 121.5MHz. However, these seemingly came from an aircraft! On both occasions, it seems that the Distress and Diversion cell were providing assistance to inexperienced pilots who had found themselves in worse weather than they expected. While that assistance was being given, it is reported that a series of transmissions were made by people who were apparently pilots (possibly holding licences issued outside the UK) suggesting that the radio exchanges providing that assistance were interfering with their own operations. It is standard procedure (indeed a requirement) for airliner crews to listen out on 121.5MHz in addition to their own operating frequency while cruising. Some of these crews may consider that their convenience is more important than the necessary training calls (Practice Pan), or as in this case even the provision of essential safety assistance. They are wrong.The UK Distress and Diversion service provides direct assistance to pilots in a manner unique in the world. Those who have never experienced the service, nor learnt about it during their training, may feel the frequency is being misused. However it is not up to them to attempt to make unauthorised transmissions. They have the facility to submit reports if they are concerned about what they believe might be a possible misuse of the frequency.Apparently the interfering transmissions in at least one of the reported instances were so frequent and so aggressive that the inexperienced pilot found themselves concentrating more on the accusations than their flying. Ladies and gentlemen,[if you need assistance, you are not only entitled but encouraged to ask for it on 121.5MHz, and if you are subjected to such unauthorised transmissions ignore them as much as you can, Do take note and report them,because it is possible they may not be received by the D & D ground stations. For those of you who may be unaware, GASIL is the official publication of the CAA SRG. Mods, please would you be kind enough to leave this here for the real culprits to see? If you wish to lock it so that it is "read only" that's fine but it needs to be read by the small number of highly unprofessional people bringing commercial aviation into disrepute and putting people's lives at risk. |
Being a lowly GA pilot, I generally flick between a local ATIS and 121.5 on box 2. I've reported 2 (CAT) aircraft this year for frankly outrageous abuse of the D&D frequency. Casual, unneccessary, sarcastic transmissions on an emergency frequency are not big, nor are they clever. I have no idea whether any action was taken as a result of my reports. I would like to hope so, yet I cynically suspect not.
Flying in command of a large jet does not immunise you from being a complete d1ckhead with your head up your arse when you press the transmit button and revert to schoolboy mode. |
:ok:
DX Wombat, Superb response. As a (as Shunter puts it) lowly GA pilot, but also an ATCO, it never ceases to amaze me how quickly any transmission on 121.5 is met by cries of "you're on guard!!!!" as if the frequency should remain sterile at all times. Said responses often eminate from CAA licence holders as well. |
Heard the classic the other day, some poor sod accidentally called xxx ops on 121.5 (we have all done it) then some smart arse replies "you are on guard" which was obviously misheard as "go ahead" and then this guy unfortunately gives his ETA at XXX etc.
Just wish the guard police would give it a rest!!! |
something to try out . . . . . . . . ! !
This thread has been a complete eye opener to me ! Had PPL for 27 years, but never heard of this before !
Next times I go flying I'll certainly be listening out on 121.5 on box 2, so I wonder whom I'll hear ? ! |
"so I wonder whom I'll hear"
Well AMEandPPL, you will most probably hear some retard calling their company or worse still doing a PA/talking to cabin crew, followed by about 5 yanks saying "your on Guard". This is why, I am sorry to say, a lot of airline pilots no longer monitor 121.5, it's a complete waste of time. You will seldom hear any genuine practice pans/emergencies because they will be blocked out by the guard police who are at higher altitudes and therefore have stronger transmissions. |
BS !
Guard is still monitored in my company by 90 % of all pilots. Used guard this morning to find a company a/c that vanished from london ATC. No problem, only a short call, problem fixed. Guard still has a useful function IMHO ! |
OK guys I admit I have not read all the posts on this thread, but in the UK practice "Pans" are encouraged for training purposes and you have to do it on 121.5 or 243 cos they are the only frequencies D&D have with Auto-Triangulation. Nuff said!
|
121.5...a complete waste of time, with all the UK prats calling for practise PANS at all hours.
A pox on these folks.:yuk: |
411A is right about 121.5
slam_dunk Guard is still monitored in my company by 90 % of all pilots. How much of % do you contribute to Guard Police ? 411A is right. Switch it off unless you really need it. Like no more contact on active fq after a suspicious silence. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:15. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.