Originally Posted by Right Way Up
(Post 3837391)
FD,
Approach ban is not a UK limitation it is a JAR one. (1.405) The term is an old one but still applies that you cannot pass the marker or equivalent point unless the RVR is equal or better to minima. |
Shot Nancy,
Quote: When there is an R in front of the runway then that means that it is an RVR and the N means no change (not North!). U would mean RVR increasing and D decreasing. RVR past tendancy: U (up), D (down), or N (no change). I think we are all being wound up. Who's winding up who? |
Savvy? ATC don't ban you they just warn you that you will be landing below minima. Stolen from the locos landing below minima thread (from UK AIP) 4 If pilots state that it is their intention to commence an instrument approach and the reported RVR is below the Absolute Minimum, ATC will issue a warning message as follows: ‘(Callsign) you are advised that the current RVR/visibility is (number) metres which is below the absolute minimum for a (name) approach to runway (number). What are your intentions?’ 4.1 If pilots indicate that it is their intention to continue the approach below 1000 ft above aerodrome level, ATC will pass the following message: ‘(Callsign) if you continue the approach and descend below 1000 ft above aerodrome level, it is believed that you will be contravening UK legislation and I shall be required to report the facts, acknowledge’. This will be followed, at the appropriate moment, with: ‘(Callsign) there is no known traffic to affect you making a (name) approach to runway (number)’. Subsequently, ATC controllers will not issue a landing clearance but will use the following phraseology at the appropriate time: ‘(Callsign) runway visual range (number) metres, there is no known traffic to affect you landing, surface wind (number) degrees (number (knots))’. |
I stand corrected.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 16:43. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.