PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rumours & News (https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news-13/)
-   -   Urgent:all Pilots In/out Lhr/lgw (https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/272179-urgent-all-pilots-out-lhr-lgw.html)

opnot 16th Apr 2007 18:58

Tubby Linton
Man does have the capability of setting up routes for acft, but unlike Heathrow and Gatwick we do not have a dedicated lighting panel operator to do this job unless we are in LVPS when the 24L controller becomes available. Rest assured I would prefer to say " follow the greens" rather than give you several different taxiways

Crusty Ol Cap'n 16th Apr 2007 19:19

In more than 40 years of operating world wide I can only say that this is the best system I have encountered anywhere. Keep it!

tired 16th Apr 2007 19:41

Best system I've seen in 30 years of flying - please keep the greens!

ONEWORLD_86 16th Apr 2007 20:13

Have to agree with the majority of the responses, i see it as an asset that we would be much worse off without.

Provides in many ways a second confirmation of the taxi clearence, and with the high traffic volumes in and out of the two airports the red stopbars can bring your attention to other traffic on the taxiway, especially at night!

Keep the greens!

Hogg 16th Apr 2007 20:31

Keep It
 
I operate B767 longhaul outta Heathrow and love the green system. Worked down terminal 5 (parked up) too. Keep It. Lgw good too when 75 in there but gatwick so easy to get around.........

bugg smasher 16th Apr 2007 21:15

...and from the Yank side of the pond.

Awesome stuff, wish we had it here, would have prevented more than one or two events.

Jaun Huw Nose 16th Apr 2007 21:17

Excellent system, should be used everywere! (especially MAN!!):rolleyes:

tubby linton 16th Apr 2007 21:39

Sorry to go off topic for just a small bit but the taxiway system at MAN is like the roads on the landside-there is barely a couple of hundred yards of straight line in the place.Also when it is wet( a not unusual occurrence at MAN) the stand designation lines are very hard to see at night.The naming system of taxiways seem to me to have no logic to them at MAN.The green system down south is excellent and I would be very sad to see it go!

fireflybob 16th Apr 2007 21:40

So rather than stop using this fantastic system at LHR the general consensus from the users seems to be that the "greens" should be used everywhere else! Here, here!

Feather #3 16th Apr 2007 21:41

I've been flying in to LHR for 37 years and "follow the greens" should be world standard.

G'day ;)

autothrottle 16th Apr 2007 21:56

thanks guys, my colleagues are sure happy with the response level! LETS hope certain managers take a look too!:ok:

Eileen Dover 16th Apr 2007 22:08

Gonzo


It's BAA's airport at the end of the day, and if they decide to get rid of the AGLCS then they will get rid of the AGLCS.
I am not so sure you are right here, CAP168, Licensing of Aerodromes states:-

At aerodromes where operations take place in RVR less than 400m or where ground movement requirements are complex, a taxiway guidence and control system should be installed, except where aircraft movements are limited
I have spoken to my good friend Chester Draws, Lighting Operator at Heathrow, today and there is a rumor doing the rounds that BA have been asked to ask this question by NATS Management!! how true this is I can only speculate.

Having seen the system in action a few times, I firmley believe that had it been in use at Milan and Taipae then a lot of souls would have been saved, what price do BA, BAA & NATS put on peoples lives?

Saftey should never be comprimised and I believe that this system and the great job the Lighting Operators do is a major factor in the safe operation of Heathrow!

Eileen

Puritan 16th Apr 2007 22:09

Used the 'greens' tonight at LGW... & it never ceases to amaze me... it's a brilliant system!!! :ok:

Ps. Would somebody please tell the French about it?... gawd knows they could do with it at CDG ! :rolleyes:

haughtney1 16th Apr 2007 22:20


It has come to light that BRITISH AIRWAYS want to change this system, one that a lot of pilots like as it is simple and keeps RT to a MINIMUM(it can be difficult to get a word in edgeways sometimes). Visiting pilots from other countries like it and describe it as "SUPER " OR "NEAT". BRITISH AIRWAYS asked for a meeting with the BAA/HAL to discuss a fixed system of greens.
If this proves to be true...and I'm not saying I know either way, would this prove to be yet another "brilliant" idea from the latte' quaffing chinless wonders at waterworld?
Insert...ethnic tails..bespoke aircraft options..etc etc etc

I'm flabbergasted that anyone could actually see benefit in changing this truely innovative and thoroughly superb system.

Gonzo 16th Apr 2007 22:25

Eileen,

Ok, perhaps I should have said 'modified' instead of 'got rid of', but the fact remains that there is wriggle room in CAP168. However, I'm sure noone who uses the system operationally (ATC, L/Op, Crews) would advocate such a move.

autothrottle 17th Apr 2007 06:16

Nats Management Eh???????????????????????????????????:*

basil faulty 17th Apr 2007 07:16

Please don't change it, briliiant system. With all the other problems that go on and they pick something that works well. If it aint broke don't fix it!

Orp Tolip 17th Apr 2007 07:35

To echo the comments of the vast majority here...

Its an excellent system that enhances saftey, please don't let it be removed.

My first time into LHR a few years back was a night landing and the "follow the greens" just simplified our job and allowed us to keep a safe lookout.

premiere 17th Apr 2007 08:06

Should be implemented worldwide not taken away..............

Human Factor 17th Apr 2007 08:35

Ignore BA.


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:24.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.