PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rumours & News (https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news-13/)
-   -   City Star pilot criticised for sightseeing diversion (https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/267180-city-star-pilot-criticised-sightseeing-diversion.html)

UKpaxman 8th Mar 2007 11:55

City Star pilot criticised for sightseeing diversion
 
Bet there wasn't much cockpit banter on the return leg...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/...st/6429651.stm

Newforest 8th Mar 2007 13:15

The pilot was 61 years old? What happened to the 60 retirement limit?

lordsummerisle 8th Mar 2007 13:44

I may be wrong, but think that only applies to Europe? Remember that we had a Captain a few years ago that could fly as a Captain on domestic routes, but anything within Europe only as a co-pilot. Have a feeling it may have only been France as well, but rules could have changed.

ETOPS 8th Mar 2007 14:45


The pilot was 61 years old? What happened to the 60 retirement limit?
Wake up a the back there Newforest

The retirement age increased to 65 last year !

skianyn vannin 8th Mar 2007 17:23

I wonder if this was the same clown who got the sack (sorry made redundant) from BA Connect last year for doing the same thing. The age would be about right and I understand he later secured a job with citystar.

Anyone who wants to, can read about it in AAIB bulletin. The aircraft reg was GNVSB I think.

Mr R Sole 9th Mar 2007 06:10

Eh.... sightseeing diversion? Think that is a bit far fetched!

islandhopper 9th Mar 2007 07:50

Ahhhh them were the days--we just pulled the cb's before them sightseeing trips!!!!!!!!!:=

False Capture 9th Mar 2007 09:36

skianyn vannin,

I thought the same as you. I assume you're refering to the clown who still thinks he's fighting the war in 'Nam.:ugh:

Nil further 9th Mar 2007 12:10

It would indeed appear to be the "same clown" covered in the Glasgow Herald today ,sorry i dont have the link.

TheShadow 9th Mar 2007 12:34

Patently False TCAS and EGPWS Alerts
 
I'm in fact doing a study on crews/pilots who've been punished/suspended/censured/reprimanded for not responding to patently false avionics warnings (TCAS/EGPWS/wind-shear alerts etc):
.
a. see this link
Obviously the new parallel runway at Logan will be generating plenty of these TCAS warnings.
.
b. Seem to recall a 2003 incident on mid-finals at Johanneshurg where a BA 747 crew didn't go round on receiving an EGPWS warning in eight/eighths blue - and were suspended, censured and retrained.
.
Anybody know of any similar instances?
.
Anybody apprehensive about the forthcoming new generation of weather radars with built-in turbulence avoidance directives?
.

flash8 9th Mar 2007 17:11

AAIB Bulletin: 9/2005 G-NVSB EW/G2005/03/31 is what you are looking for.

Quote: "Significant discrepancy exists regarding each pilot’s recall of the EGPWS event."

Yeh. Where have I heard that before?

If I'd been that FO I'd have been scared ****less. The Commander quite patently doesn't belong anywhere near an a/c.

BOAC 9th Mar 2007 17:51


b. Seem to recall a 2003 incident on mid-finals at Johanneshurg where a BA 747 crew didn't go round on receiving an EGPWS warning in eight/eighths blue - and were suspended, censured and retrained.
- Shadow - possibly misleading now. Somewhere around 2003 the BA SOP for EGPWS 'relaxed' to allow non-action in day/VMC when pos can be identified and is safe. Up to then it was a mandatory g/a regardless. I believe one pilot had one at around 50' over a runway in Germany (day/VMC) in the flare and (correctly) went round.

Strepsils 9th Mar 2007 23:19

He's been more than criticised, he's been sacked according to one national newspaper.

DB6 10th Mar 2007 07:53

Nearly flying into Fitful Head in marginal conditions isn't really explainable away at the hats-on interview.
Link is http://www.aaib.dft.gov.uk/publicati...00__tf_csb.cfm

Say again s l o w l y 10th Mar 2007 08:04

Hats on? I reckon there would be a bit of an axminster shuffle over this one! To say it was a daft thing to do is a wee bit of an understatement.

I'm used to EGPWS warnings requiring an instant reaction unless they can "immediately disregarded." i.e in gin clear conditions and an obviously spurious warning.

skianyn vannin 10th Mar 2007 09:13

Hi False Capture

absolutely right. I suspect he still thinks he's chasing down the VietCong in his Huey. Heard on the grapevine he now lives out in Thailand, so a bit closer to the battlefields now.

And for those of you who think these GPWS warnings were false, whilst I can't comment on the Sumburgh incident, the one at Fraggle Rock was definitely for real. A colleague of mine was positioning down the back and thought they were going to hit the side of a hill. All he could hear was the GPWS going off and no attempt to pull up!

omnidirectional737 10th Mar 2007 11:23

Re CMF you can get a sink rate if you maintain the glide or a glideslope if you fly it with 3 reds. But the CAA have given dispensation to not file an ASR's if you get a GPWS due to the approach geometry.

chevvron 10th Mar 2007 13:40

Back in the '70s, it was the norm for the BEA Viscount to transit VFR at 500ft in this part of the world (weather permitting). You get a wonderful view of Scapa Flow from 500ft from the flight deck.
Then there was a trip to Barbados I did with BWIA in an A340. It was Christmas Day, and the Captain flew VFR down the west coast of the island at about 1500ft, left wing down all the way so all passengers got a good view.

TheShadow 10th Mar 2007 15:41

I seem to also recall that a year or two ago there was a spurious TCAS RA scenario generated between a QANTAS airplane and a GA aircraft in a New Zealand circuit at low-level. (Auckland/Christchurch?)

Was there ever a Pprune thread on that?

Basil 10th Mar 2007 22:22

chevvron,
Used to fly them which is why I'd reserve judgement on this guy's incident.
The Abbey on Iona, Fingal's Cave, the Old Man, aaahhh.


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:10.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.