PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rumours & News (https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news-13/)
-   -   Pod Scrape at LHR (https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/196956-pod-scrape-lhr.html)

Captain Rat 3rd Nov 2005 17:05

Pod Scrape at LHR
 
Seems the windy conditions got the better of one 747 this morning at LHR with a number 1 engine pod scrape on landing....

Carnage Matey! 3rd Nov 2005 17:49

Whose the culprit?

Warped Factor 3rd Nov 2005 18:13


Whose the culprit?
Whoever decided to close 23...

WF.

JW411 3rd Nov 2005 19:48

I could not have put it better but the damage is unlikely to come out of the BAA budget.

411A 3rd Nov 2005 21:21

Good grief...
 
Here we go again.

Lets see.
The airport is responsible because 23 is closed.

What claptrap.

IF the handling pilot cannot land the aeroplane with a decent crosswind component, they should be assigned to a ground job where, all things considered....they belong.

Hey, they accepted the job, passed the checks, and if they canNOT cut the mustard, they should get a don't come Monday letter.

BOAC 3rd Nov 2005 21:31

Let's hear it again for the 'wing-down' boys.....................:D

newt 3rd Nov 2005 21:35

Here we go again. Judgement before the facts are known!! We all make mistakes and it is unfair to be so critical at this stage in an open forum. Try to think how you would feel if it ever happened to you! GIVE THE GUY A BREAK!!!!

wingman863 3rd Nov 2005 22:23

411A; while you have the bones of a valid point, everyone does make mistakes and to say the pilot should be assigned to ground duties is to say that anyone who has ever had a tiny shunt in their car should have their driving license revolked. A tad stupid methinks.

Farrell 3rd Nov 2005 22:45


IF the handling pilot cannot land the aeroplane with a decent crosswind component, they should be assigned to a ground job where, all things considered....they belong.
You have to hand it to 411A though. He is one of the best putter-downers on this forum. ;)

Doors to Automatic 4th Nov 2005 00:52

Was the landing in question on 27R by any chance?

Witraz 4th Nov 2005 05:52

411A writes

What claptrap.

IF the handling pilot cannot land the aeroplane with a decent crosswind component, they should be assigned to a ground job where, all things considered....they belong.

Hey, they accepted the job, passed the checks, and if they canNOT cut the mustard, they should get a don't come Monday letter.
Again jumping in with both feet. Ever looked at the record of pod scrapes on the B747. Get the right configuration and wind, it happens. I feel sorry for the crew. Guess like the last time they will get the talking to, six crosswind landings in the simulator and be back out on line. Not sure I would like to share a flightdeck with someone as perfect as 411A. Could be dangerous.

Farmer 1 4th Nov 2005 05:57


Here we go again. Judgement before the facts are known!! We all make mistakes and it is unfair to be so critical at this stage in an open forum. Try to think how you would feel if it ever happened to you! GIVE THE GUY A BREAK!!!!

411A; while you have the bones of a valid point, everyone does make mistakes and to say the pilot should be assigned to ground duties is to say that anyone who has ever had a tiny shunt in their car should have their driving license revolked. A tad stupid methinks.

'No, no!' said the Queen. 'Sentence first - verdict afterwards.' Lewis Carroll

christn 4th Nov 2005 06:20

Those that can do, those that cannot sit at home and make silly comments on PPRuNe!

Captain Rat 4th Nov 2005 07:48

In answer to a previous question, yes it was 27R, could that be why they seemed to be using 27L for the rest of the day (no change over at 3pm as normal. (May have been other reasons?)
As to which airline involved, I think nothing is gained by naming it.
Regardless of pilot skills, the fact is that if 23 was still available then the chances are this wouldn't have happened. As previously said, I'm sure the BAA wont pick up the repair bill, but I'm sure closing the runway has saved a few pounds...

Del Prado 4th Nov 2005 08:07

When the wind is strong from the south west it is standard practise to use 27L for landing due to turbulence from hangers on approach to 27R. this incident had no bearing on de-alternation.
The problem is that a strong SW wind gives a stronger headwind component. The landing rate suffers as a result, so delays go up.
Then we use the departure runway to land an extra 6 per hour (TEAM). I believe the aircraft yesterday was allocated the departure runway (27R).

Maybe if there wasn't so much pressure put on the landing rate by airline management we wouldn't be exposed to these risks.

Onions 4th Nov 2005 08:50

All this is all very well but who's was it?

A37575 4th Nov 2005 10:12

411A is saying nothing that the silent majority of Pprune readers reading this thread don't already think. Too often, cocked up crosswind landings are the result of incompetent handling so why shy away from saying it? And why be so coy of naming the airline concerned? Political correctness gone mad again?

Artificial Horizon 4th Nov 2005 10:23

Hey these things happen, it was at times a pretty awful day weather wise yesterday. We are all just a tiny slip up away from similar things happening. I don't feel that it is very useful to be critical of the pilots before all of the facts are known. Just hope I am lucky enough that I avoid this sort of incident in my future!!!

GOLF-INDIA BRAVO 4th Nov 2005 10:40

I`m not aircrew but we all know what a cross wind can do if it is gusty and not only with planes

I was on a double desk bus going up the M4 to Heathrow a few years ago and it was caught by a cross wind and blown right across three lanes and the driver only just managed to catch it before it hit the central reserve
I was on the top deck at front and it scared the living daylights out of me

G-I-B

alexban 4th Nov 2005 10:42

met conditions at the time-wind aprox 200deg with 25-36 kt ,more or less. Our flight,landing some time later on 27L had encounter strong windshear bellow 100' .I only imagine what was like landing on that conditions on 27R ,with the turbulance given by the hangars...some great show for the guys on the airport to watch..:}


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:00.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.