Debonair
Remeber these guys? What was the real flaw in their operation
|
high costs and low fares and therefore yields - simple as that
could always start a debate about how 146s are not suitable for a low cost operation as well... |
One could, but since buzz is making a success of a low-fares 146 operation, it would be pretty pointless. More likely a case of "wrong place, wrong time", a bit of bad luck and maybe the odd planning error.
------------------ The future's yellow; powered by purple! |
Wrong place - wrong time - and....
Debonair did not only operate 146's but was also hiring, at high costs, some F50's and F100's from wetlease-companies like Denim Air and EAE. When you want to make a succes out of a low-cost-carrier never-ever hire high-priced turboprops instead of operating your own lost-cost-jet-fleet like the 146's (yes indeed, the 146's are very capable to operate on shorthaul routes at a minimum price!) |
buzz are indeed a low fares operation - but not low cost - big difference
it was largely a klmuk rebrand and are they really making a success of it?? still not aware of any operator successfully using 146s in a low COST setup |
the guy who ran it has screwed up everything he's touched
i worked for him years ago one week they were ticketless, next week ticketed one week full service next week nothing he didnt have any kind of direction |
Thanks guys. Wasn't AB Airlines around at this time too, with their problems? Different problems I guess. Not a good period obviuosly.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:01. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.