777x woes
Personally I don’t see a long term future for Boeing as it is presently configured. It has been too badly broken at every level by a management culture that knew the cost of everything and the value of nothing.
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Castletown
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
During the design phase of the 777x and due to the longer fuselage, a system like the 737 MAX (MCAS) was probably needed to satisfy the stalling characteristics of the 777x.
The CCS software of the 787 appearing in the 777x seems an interesting debate.
Considering how many great engineers Boeing once had on the 777 and other programs, it is a reflection of cost driving quality and profit!
The CCS software of the 787 appearing in the 777x seems an interesting debate.
Considering how many great engineers Boeing once had on the 777 and other programs, it is a reflection of cost driving quality and profit!
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: USVI
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There is a stability issue with the tail section...in reality, the 777 already had this, hence the infamous "flutter" "fix" which makes the rear pax and crew seasick...
Rather that redesign the tail, which would have taken the ac out of rapid approval, BA chose the usual software fix...last test fight was what 8 months ago, and yet still no idea from BA what went wrong.
the results from several tests, as well as test flights, have been hidden, until this latest FAA report...
cert maybe by mid 2024?
Emirates was supposed to get the ac delivered in 2020....and they are not happy...now they must be livid.
Rather that redesign the tail, which would have taken the ac out of rapid approval, BA chose the usual software fix...last test fight was what 8 months ago, and yet still no idea from BA what went wrong.
the results from several tests, as well as test flights, have been hidden, until this latest FAA report...
cert maybe by mid 2024?
Emirates was supposed to get the ac delivered in 2020....and they are not happy...now they must be livid.
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Within AM radio broadcast range of downtown Chicago
Age: 71
Posts: 724
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FAA Letter
Tweet linked here contains text of FAA letter.
davidshepardson (@davidshepardson) Tweeted:
.@FAANews letter to @Boeing https://t.co/0ymxWa2Vq7 (reported earlier by Seattle Times) https://t.co/9reBeqjJlD
davidshepardson (@davidshepardson) Tweeted:
.@FAANews letter to @Boeing https://t.co/0ymxWa2Vq7 (reported earlier by Seattle Times) https://t.co/9reBeqjJlD
Join Date: May 2004
Location: 3.5 from TD
Age: 47
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They caught the Max issues before EIS as well. They just made the financial choice to play the blame
game and deal with the fallout, rather than fix the problems. 🤔
Its not a manufacturer anymore, its a Brokerage firm. Putting out the same quality aircraft as you would get if JP Morgan was building airliners. You can thank the Fed for that. 👍
game and deal with the fallout, rather than fix the problems. 🤔
Its not a manufacturer anymore, its a Brokerage firm. Putting out the same quality aircraft as you would get if JP Morgan was building airliners. You can thank the Fed for that. 👍
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Planet Moo Moo
Posts: 1,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Shame it took such a sad series of accidents for the FAA to finally grow some balls and tell Boeing their processes aren't good enough.
It will be interesting to see how this effects customer deliveries and training!
It will be interesting to see how this effects customer deliveries and training!
short flights long nights
turbidus
As EK is struggling to fill its current 777s.. they may be happy for the delay.
As EK is struggling to fill its current 777s.. they may be happy for the delay.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wirbelsturm
Looking at the tweeted images of the letter, FAA actually told Boeing that they had in fact failed to even follow their own processes let alone comply with the FAA's.
I would have thought (and in fact the letter implies) that whether/when to apply for TIA would be the subject of much discussion prior to application so that there would be no surprises or maybe an "ok but on review we've identified some minor hold ups", whereas this letter is in effect a total slap down. So much that I wonder if the ODAs at Boeing were being pressured from above to submit when they knew they weren't ready and asked the FAA smack them as hard as possible for it so they had a big "told you so" to beat management with. Don't suppose we'll ever find out.
Looking at the tweeted images of the letter, FAA actually told Boeing that they had in fact failed to even follow their own processes let alone comply with the FAA's.
I would have thought (and in fact the letter implies) that whether/when to apply for TIA would be the subject of much discussion prior to application so that there would be no surprises or maybe an "ok but on review we've identified some minor hold ups", whereas this letter is in effect a total slap down. So much that I wonder if the ODAs at Boeing were being pressured from above to submit when they knew they weren't ready and asked the FAA smack them as hard as possible for it so they had a big "told you so" to beat management with. Don't suppose we'll ever find out.
Less Hair
or to Antarctica. Everyone but the engineers.
or to Antarctica. Everyone but the engineers.
Wirbelsturm
A shame, yes, but good news, actually, that FAA certification executives did not stand in the way of this letter authored by an FAA engineer. A glimmer of hope that FAA is taking such stands.
A shame, yes, but good news, actually, that FAA certification executives did not stand in the way of this letter authored by an FAA engineer. A glimmer of hope that FAA is taking such stands.
