Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

BA 787 Nosewheel collapse @ LHR

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

BA 787 Nosewheel collapse @ LHR

Old 12th Jul 2021, 13:30
  #121 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is. But you can deactivate it via virtual breakers on the 787 for ground maintenance in order to "cycle" the gear and carry out various tests. Of course, the aircraft should be jacked up for this or gear appropriately pinned.
OldPilot71 is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2021, 14:41
  #122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Brum
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AAIB report out...

The DDG procedure required the cockpit landing gear selection lever to be cycled with hydraulic power applied to the aircraft. To prevent the landing gear from retracting, the procedure required pins to be inserted in the nose and main landing gear downlocks. However, the NLG downlock pin was installed in the NLG downlock apex pin bore which was adjacent to the correct location to install the downlock pin. When the landing gear selector was cycled the NLG retracted.
Nige321 is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2021, 15:34
  #123 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Uk
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An Airworthiness Directive had been issued, with a 36-month compliance from 16 January 2020, to install an insert over the apex pin bore to prevent incorrect installation of the downlock pin, but this had not yet been implemented on G-ZBJB.
I wonder how many airlines will now have had a "oh hell" moment and be rushing to complete this presumably simple maintenance task to block up the wrong hole to prevent reocurrence. Cost per aircraft to rectify is less than $2K and takes 2 hours, according to this:

https://www.federalregister.gov/docu...pany-airplanes

Seems like the exact same problem has happened at least three times now...
Snyggapa is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2021, 15:52
  #124 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 14,415
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
From the report:

"As [Mechanic 1] was not tall enough to reach the NLG locking pin hole without steps, he pointed to the location of the hole and [Mechanic 2] fitted the NLG locking pin."

Oops.
DaveReidUK is online now  
Old 14th Jul 2021, 17:15
  #125 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: EU
Posts: 640
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Classic Murphy, great design.
golfyankeesierra is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2021, 02:12
  #126 (permalink)  
601
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Brisbane, Qld, Australia
Age: 76
Posts: 1,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
$2K and takes 2 hours,
for a bit of plastic and 5 minutes work?
601 is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2021, 02:32
  #127 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Here and there....currently here.
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Snyggapa

As I've said previously - it maybe a simple job, but a lot of us Engineers, including maintenance planners have been stood down/furloughed/redundant/left the industry over the past 18 months. Factor in also that this job would normally be carried out as part of hangar check package which are usually scheduled on flying hours and with the reduced flying hours of aircraft the hangar checks have gotten further apart on a calendar basis, it shouldn't be hard to see that a lack of Engineers and manhours, and planned maintenance events have compounded this situation. During aircraft parking, the Aircraft Maintenance Program is also suspended and in most cases no maintenance activities are carried out apart from those required under the parking/storage requirements. I would think a lot of operators are now starting to plan this work out on the line on their active airframes, if they have enough Engineers available.

Just like pilots, we have to got through recurrent training packages, and due to the current extended stand down situation possible re-qualification. Some companies may also have to go through a recruitment process before they get enough Engineers on-line, so don't expect Engineering support to be fully back to normality for a while yet. I'm forever hopeful that eventually companies will see the value of maintenance and Engineering, rather than the cost.

Last edited by Tom Sawyer; 15th Jul 2021 at 02:34. Reason: add detail.
Tom Sawyer is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2021, 21:01
  #128 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: London
Age: 63
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
https://www.theregister.com/2021/07/...n_aaib_report/

Alanwsg is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2021, 22:02
  #129 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 14,415
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Thanks.

The AAIB report linked in post #122 inexplicably omitted the reference to Laurel and Hardy ...
DaveReidUK is online now  
Old 21st Jul 2021, 13:59
  #130 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Intentionally Left Blank
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Out of simple curiosity, does anyone know how many of the 32 787s in the BA fleet had the AD completed prior to this incident?
Icarus is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2021, 11:29
  #131 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 2,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It seems we cannot assume that all engineers read their notices, or airworthiness directives, nor that they know, or can work out just by looking, where a ground lock pin must go?

And this at a company that failed to notice that the engine cowl locks on both engines were not closed prior to departure on an Airbus out of Heathrow.

What a sorry state of affairs.

How difficult is it for engineering to print a label and stick it on the leg; pointing to the ground lock pin hole? Would take about 2 mins per aircraft with a portable label printer.

Uplinker is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2021, 12:23
  #132 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hongkong
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face If only...

If Only....

I'm pleased to imagine Uplinker that you have an approved portable label-printer about your person, all ready to print approved labels. I wonder how long it took you to get the required approval and how much each printer costs. From my experience, said printer would cost ten times (at least) the cost of a similar/identical unappoved printer available in your local Staples (other stationers are available). I also hope you have your credit card handy for when the label that you stuck on comes unglued and lodges on the forward weight switch and prevents the gear from retracting (other scenarios are available). A great (simple idea) but not for the real (bureaucratic, or read [misguidedly] 'safety conscious') world.

'This at a company that failed to notice the engine cowl locks were not closed prior to departure'. Which company would that be, cos many worldwide operators of Airbus aircraft also fell into the same trap. A problem first with design (both problems) and then with training and finally with manpower currency/shortages in the current situation.

I'm not saying you're wrong. If only it were that simple...

Last edited by Sygyzy; 23rd Jul 2021 at 12:25. Reason: spelling
Sygyzy is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2021, 14:32
  #133 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Around here
Age: 47
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Approved stencil, approved spray paint, approved technique. Go.
lancs is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2021, 14:47
  #134 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 57
Posts: 3,262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was reading on another thread about pilots not retracting the landing gear after takeoff. How difficult is it to print off and follow a checklist, physically lift a lever and move it up, observe the green lights extinguish.

We are all human. happens.
TURIN is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2021, 15:51
  #135 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dorset UK
Age: 69
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whilst a full safety assessment for a label might be required, some simple things only need a bit of common sense.
The A300 freighters I was on had a CB for the main deck cargo door that would sometimes pop for no known reason, and at 3am when tired, trying to find it in the electronics bay under floor could cause a delay.
Someone came up with the idea of painting a red ring around the CB and a label saying "This One". Never had a problem finding it after that.
Simple common sense solutions used to be approved by the CAA in a thing called a "Minor Modification".
dixi188 is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2021, 18:52
  #136 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 67
Posts: 3,721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
601

Given there is an AD associated with it - 2 hours to do the paperwork is about right.
tdracer is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2021, 19:57
  #137 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Uk
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sygyzy

I wouldn't say 3 engineers on a 787 turnaround is short on manpower. Currency/experience maybe.

Although myself personally raising the gear lever to UP for any ground procedure is the biggest butt puckering task for me. And this may seem self righteous but when it comes to it I trust no one to make sure the pins are in. I get off my arse and go and put them in or check they're in. Just force of habit.
Yeehaw22 is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2021, 01:19
  #138 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Whanganui, NZ
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I read that the FAA estimated cost - parts & labour - is $2,000 per aircraft.
Which looks kinda cheap compared to the cost of delaying the flight of the "Oops" aircraft, let alone the (?100 times as much?) cost of fixing it
kiwi grey is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2021, 11:14
  #139 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Freedom Sound
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of course if that area at the top of the nose u/c was designed by an engineer and not by CAD, then it is a fairly good example of no Murphyism occurring! Also, who authorised/signed off on the final design of that area where the Very important nose u/c ground locking pin is fitted? Human Factors again, preventing possible "cock-ups".
esscee is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2021, 12:12
  #140 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 2,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Sygyzy, point taken. Every engineering facility I have ever worked in has a portable label maker in the test room. Used to be Dymo, now they are electronically printed. Or if not a label, what about a ring of red paint round the correct hole, or a red arrow?

Regarding approval, do the company decals and paint colours on the fuselage have to be approved by the manufacturer and the XAA before an aircraft is sprayed with paint? Many aircraft have the last two letters of the registration painted somewhere on or around the nose gear leg. Are these specifically approved? Genuine question.

Speaking of company decals, there are lots of pictures on this thread showing photos of the aircraft, so the airline involved can clearly be seen, to answer your last question That airline is supposed to be one of the very best, I thought?

Hi Turin, yes fair point, hence my views elsewhere on pilot training and practise - seems the rot has now started to reach other areas of operations too? This incident did not involve an aircraft in flight - so there was no immediacy required and the nose gear pin was checked by more than one engineer on three separate occasions, if I've read the report correctly !
Uplinker is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright © 2022 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.