Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

737-500 missing in Indonesia

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

737-500 missing in Indonesia

Old 30th Mar 2021, 16:07
  #721 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Within AM radio broadcast range of downtown Chicago
Age: 69
Posts: 455
I don't believe it's accurate to speak of "several international aviation agencies." There's ICAO. And it's the only game in town.
IATA is a trade association; IFALPA an organized labor entity; ACI an airports industry group, etc.

Annex 13, under which investigations are conducted, itself isn't exactly "law." The Chicago Convention of 1944 is an instrument within international law, but the extent to which any Annex is "law" gets into pedantic territory (and even more so regarding SARPs....).
WillowRun 6-3 is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2021, 16:26
  #722 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Where it is comfortable...
Age: 57
Posts: 802
Regarding the questions referring to the responsibility of the SAR costs, if my rusty memory is correct it was all set out in the original 1944 Chicago Convention (the one that established ICAO) or perhaps some later amendment. Adhering States provide Air Traffic and SAR services to all flights falling under the Convention, and in return they may collect an Air Navigation Charge proportional to the overflown distance modulated by an aircraft weight formula to recover these costs. While purely domestic flights do not fall under the Chicago Convention, most adhering States apply the same rules to domestic traffic too. Same Convention sets out responsibilities for accident investigation, and any related search and recovery costs are bourn by the investigating authority (in principle also funded from the Air Navigation Charge). The picture becomes complicated when a small country (with proportionately small ANC income) needs to fund a major investigation (usually involving a foreign airline), but in this case they have the option to delegate the investigation to another interested party (State of operator or manufacturer).

Of course in real life in most countries the collected charges just get swallowed up by the larger state budget, and there is some moaning involved when the bill is presented for an expensive recovery operation (usually carried out by specialised salvage firms).
andrasz is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2021, 02:58
  #723 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Jakarta
Posts: 20
CVR is found.
BREAKING NEWS: CVR Black Box Sriwijaya Air SJ 182 Ditemukan (kompas.com)
Indonesia recovers cockpit voice recorder of crashed Sriwijaya Air jet (yahoo.com)
Realbabilu is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2021, 05:09
  #724 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 777
Fantastic news
Chris2303 is online now  
Old 31st Mar 2021, 05:32
  #725 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Age: 55
Posts: 1,771
Very good news indeed, but let's wait to see if it can be exploited...
In any case congrats to the salvage team !
atakacs is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2021, 07:04
  #726 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 14
Fantastic search team, respect.
Less Hair is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2021, 07:33
  #727 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: IRS NAV ONLY
Posts: 1,121
That's absolutely brilliant, well done to every one involved.

I was certain it was gone for good.
FlyingStone is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2021, 08:47
  #728 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Surrey, England
Posts: 41
737-500 missing in Indonesia

Just a thought but but why not have duplicate CVRs and FDRs on aircraft in different locations?
brianj is online now  
Old 31st Mar 2021, 09:20
  #729 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: mighty Blighty
Posts: 293
Good idea Brian. Better than impractical idea of broadcasting it for ground storage.
goeasy is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2021, 10:55
  #730 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 28
More expensive , perhaps, but not impractical.
ktcanuck is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2021, 12:28
  #731 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Spain and Gibraltar
Posts: 95
Kudos to the diving team working in those awful conditions and probably finding non airframe pieces too.
Nil by mouth is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2021, 12:56
  #732 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 13,160
ktcanuck

"More expensive, perhaps, but not impractical."

Or, if all else fails, just attach the ULBs more securely to the memory modules ...
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2021, 14:27
  #733 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 860
Still all-eggs-in-one-basket rather than redundancy - but multiple would carry weight penalties and temptation of making them less crash-survivable and risking all of them not surviving, tradeoff as always.

But with what you say, is there a reason the ULBs have to be separate and "attached" (or detachable...), why not integrated?

I have vague idea this may be to do with ULBs having to be regularly replaced as the batteries die, but these days with solid state memory and near-field wireless power and data interfaces is it now possible to do ULB / CSMU in a single easily replaceable module?
infrequentflyer789 is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2021, 14:42
  #734 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Korea
Posts: 119
How would you suggest to trigger an integrated ULB? As the current models are set off by immersion into water, that would not work quite well if encased.
Euclideanplane is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2021, 14:48
  #735 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 3,564
Great news - as above I'm sure its been a very tough job. Physically unpleasant .

There's a tendency to slag off the Indonesians on here but they really stuck to this task
Asturias56 is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2021, 14:55
  #736 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Scotland
Age: 72
Posts: 97
Ref post 728. When you see what Airlines are doing to save money / weight / fuel costs I cannot see them duplicating anything.

https://www.aerotime.aero/23619-17-t...irlines-change

Modern FDR’s and CVR’s monitor so many things the How it happened & What caused it can now more easily be found. Until such times as Cockpit Video Recorders are installed the Why can sometimes only be conjecture.
morton is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2021, 14:57
  #737 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Thailand
Posts: 459
Good idea Brian. Better than impractical idea of broadcasting it for ground storage.
Why is that impractical?

Data rates these days are far in excess of what is required, and storage costs absolute peanuts.

Not only could it be used for accident investigation but in these days of big data crunching with machine learning and artificial intelligence, that data could be used for failure prediction. That sort of technology is already used in other operational technologies. In the long run it could pay for itself if predictive maintenance prevents "unplanned events".

And imagine if all of those sequences of events that lead to aircraft loss are combined and analyzed, and pilots could be warned that a seemingly harmless alarm taken in context of other data indicated that a catastrophic failure was in the offing?

Added: And automatically gave him a solution?

https://analyticsindiamag.com/how-to...-data-science/
ChicoG is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2021, 15:14
  #738 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Itinerant
Posts: 750
The idea of storing CVR and FDR data outside the aircraft has been researched and discussed by all the major international aviation agencies in the recent past (especially ICAO, of course). The notion gained momemtum because of AF447 (recorders eventually located and retrieved) then again because of MH370. Of course the idea has benefits but it also has some significant hurdles.
grizzled is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2021, 17:24
  #739 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Here
Posts: 824
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK View Post
"More expensive, perhaps, but not impractical."
Or, if all else fails, just attach the ULBs more securely to the memory modules ...
Pretty likely that they are attached feebly by intent in order to protect the memory module. Musk's Starlink will make it all moot soon anyway. There will be thousands of satellites (about 1,500 today?) in low earth orbit serving as communications satellites. Price today is 500 setup + 100 a month for unlimited data.

At present only fixed base stations are supported but that is changing. Not freely available I don't think, still under some sort of test regime with limited coverage.

The commoditization of beam steering, flat plate, phased array antennas may turn out to be Elon Musk's greatest legacy. You probably didn't know you wanted one.

There was someone on another forum they other day who said something like - well it's like a moveable dish but it doesn't move, but I can't say any more 'cos its a military secret. You can now buy them for 500.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starlink

jimjim1 is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2021, 18:02
  #740 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 66
Posts: 3,339
It's been discussed to have the CVR and the FDR 'mirror' each other - i.e. have both record the same data. As memory has gotten smaller and cheaper, it's now practical.
It would require some up-front expenditures to add the capabilities, and some wiring changes to the aircraft, but it's certainly 'doable'...

The biggest drawback to 'real time' data download is recurring costs - the satellite band width doesn't come cheap.
tdracer is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.