Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

A350 Fuselage coating cracks

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

A350 Fuselage coating cracks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Sep 2022, 18:24
  #81 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 74
Posts: 3,684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What I find surprising on the TUI photo are the uneven rivets on the left, and on the foreground. The aircraft cannot the that old ...Is this normal ?
ATC Watcher is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2022, 21:14
  #82 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Spain and Gibraltar
Posts: 156
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If they're going to repaint those taped surfaces it'll be a hell of a job removing all of those bits of tape and the sticky mess left behind.
A heat gun and turpentine is probably not an approved method?
Nil by mouth is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2022, 12:54
  #83 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: near an airplane
Posts: 2,792
Received 52 Likes on 42 Posts
Originally Posted by ATC Watcher
What I find surprising on the TUI photo are the uneven rivets on the left, and on the foreground. The aircraft cannot the that old ...Is this normal ?
I don't know if it is normal, but it may be related to the paint issue. With the amount of flex in the 787 wing, you need a lot of elasticity in the paint layer and perhaps the rivets are places where bits of paint start flaking off first.
Jhieminga is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2022, 13:59
  #84 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Blighty
Posts: 788
Received 87 Likes on 22 Posts
Originally Posted by Nil by mouth
If they're going to repaint those taped surfaces it'll be a hell of a job removing all of those bits of tape and the sticky mess left behind.
A heat gun and turpentine is probably not an approved method?
Standard solvent based cleaners can be used.
HOVIS is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2022, 13:00
  #85 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: UK
Age: 42
Posts: 654
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
They're not rivets, and they're not uneven.
unmanned_droid is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2023, 14:55
  #86 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Melbourne, ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀
Age: 74
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Qatar Airways and Airbus reach amicable settlement in legal dispute


Airbus website link below, reporting that Qatar airways and Airbus have reached an amicable settlement of the A350 surface coating issue. News media also reporting that Qatar has accepted that Airbus reinstate their orders for 23 more A350's and also the 50 A321's previously cancelled by Airbus due to the dispute. Legal proceedings are discontinued. Reported that Airbus will repair the A350 surface coatings. The first of the 23 A350 deliveries are scheduled for later in 2023 and the first of the A321's are now scheduled for 2026. Remembering early reports in 2021 on the dispute that Qatar is taking legal action in London and hoping for an early resolution of the dispute, I wonder whether this settlement fits that expectation.

https://www.airbus.com/en/newsroom/p...-legal-dispute
LandIT is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2023, 17:12
  #87 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,651
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
One wonders if they (particularly the A321s) are reinstated at the original delivery dates, and at the original price. The A350s I understand are mostly built already, and stored.
WHBM is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2023, 17:23
  #88 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the first of the A321's are now scheduled for 2026
(says on the post just above your post)

The popularity of the A321 Neo - over 3,600 of the variant are backlogged - has resulted in less flexibility for reinstating the agreement
in FlightGlobal
zerograv is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2023, 19:23
  #89 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: In one of the two main circles
Age: 65
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like Mr Al Baker blinked first ... as he does need more the 350s and the 321neos than Airbus needs his business
llagonne66 is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2023, 19:26
  #90 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Age: 58
Posts: 1,907
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Not sure who balked but seen reason has finally prevailed. Better for all involved I’d say.
atakacs is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2023, 19:29
  #91 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: In one of the two main circles
Age: 65
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by atakacs
Not sure who balked but seen reason has finally prevailed. Better for all involved I’d say.
The settlement agreement being confidential, we may never know expect if it leaks someday.
Just a hunch feeling on my side
llagonne66 is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2023, 07:48
  #92 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,409
Received 361 Likes on 210 Posts
Originally Posted by llagonne66
Looks like Mr Al Baker blinked first ... as he does need more the 350s and the 321neos than Airbus needs his business
Even Mr Baker recognises that tying yourself publicly to one supplier doesn't make much sense - no discounts from Mr B when you're a captive customer.
Asturias56 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.