Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Last A380 Leaves Assembly Hall

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Last A380 Leaves Assembly Hall

Old 2nd May 2021, 11:09
  #221 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1998
Location: Mesopotamos
Posts: 1,527
Here in the land of ULH, the rumour mill is telling us Qantas are prepping their A380s for a return to passenger service. Exactly what role is anybody's guess at this moment i.e. will it be just bubble traffic, will it incorporate "socially distanced" seating, perhaps a combination of both. I'm sure someone's done the numbers.
cattletruck is offline  
Old 2nd May 2021, 20:38
  #222 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Weltschmerz-By-The-Sea, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 1,000
The rumour actually is that Qantas are taking some necessary steps to keep the future options open. They have to perform gear swings, and there is a window of opportunity now to perform heavy checks that will be due quickly if the aircraft ever again flies. I wouldn’t get too excited about the prospect of the 380 operating QF services anytime in the next 12 months.
Australopithecus is online now  
Old 3rd May 2021, 00:36
  #223 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Whanganui, NZ
Posts: 215
As I understand discussion on this thread QF A380ís, some QANTAS A380s will be ferried to LAX for gear swings so they can then be ferried to an MRO shop for a heavy check. If it is not done soon, the airframes will be only scrappable, no longer flyable. MRO shops have plenty of capacity, so that works together nicely.

What is not clear is whether this is because QANTAS expects to get (some of) the A380s flying again soon(-ish), or just Industrial Relations skulduggery.
Currently the QF A380 pilots are all on unpaid stand-down (they are accruing some leave benefits, though). If QF management publicly admit that some or all of the A380s are never going to fly in QF revenue service again, then those pilots affected can legally no longer be stood down, the Reduction In Numbers clauses in their Enterprise Agreement will be triggered. As most of the A380 pilots are top of the seniority tree, such a RIN would cause a cascade of cross-fleet displacements, retraining requirements and potentially redundancy of the least-senior pilots (almost all not on the A380). That would be hugely disruptive and immensely costly. Hence QF management has a huge incentive to maintain that the A380 fleet will come back. Only they no if this is true, wishful thinking or IR chicanery.

Last edited by kiwi grey; 3rd May 2021 at 00:36. Reason: formatting
kiwi grey is offline  
Old 3rd May 2021, 17:25
  #224 (permalink)  
bnt
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dublin, Ireland. (No, I just live here.)
Posts: 723
I was curious about how many A380s are flying at the moment, and you can do a filter for that on FlightRadar24. I can see that Qantas A380 VH-OQC is active at Victorville, CA, the airport that serves the Southern California Logistics Airport in the Mojave Desert, where it has been in storage since July last year. It doesn't show a destination, but to be active on ADS-B suggests that it could be back on the job soon, doesn't it? Apart from that, I see seven A380s in the air, all Emirates flights to or from Dubai.
bnt is offline  
Old 3rd May 2021, 17:47
  #225 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Netherlands
Age: 54
Posts: 0
It's a pity to see those 4 engined aircraft leave the scene.
I flew on 4 engines for 12 years until recently our 747s were taken out of the fleet.
2 engines are supposed to be just a reliable as 4 statistically.
But who cares about statistics?
FlyingRoland is offline  
Old 3rd May 2021, 18:05
  #226 (permalink)  
bnt
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dublin, Ireland. (No, I just live here.)
Posts: 723
Statistically, if you have four of an engine vs. two of the same engine, you are more likely to see a failure among the four, before you see it in the two. But the difference is that a failure costs you 50% of overall thrust when you have two engines, vs. 25% when you have four ...
bnt is offline  
Old 4th May 2021, 00:52
  #227 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: New jersey
Posts: 45
I believe the fact that the 777F can carry more payload at a much cheaper cost, as well as the 747-8 Freighter makes the case for an A-380 Freighter untenable. My airline ordered 10 A-380 Freighters, unfortunately, they were never built by Airbus and the orders expired.
Chiefttp is offline  
Old 4th May 2021, 06:15
  #228 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: earth
Posts: 1,090
The 380 has always been an admittedly comfortable niche product. No revolutionary technical prowess however, it can't even fly a radius to fix RNAV approach, just a nicely built aircraft with a narrow profitability window.

It was a daring bet from the start trying to sell the required break-even number of such an expensive niche product. Any 380 freight conversion would set it up in a similar freight-niche, as tdracer demonstrated.

It will be the same daring adventure now to reactivate or convert these niche planes in an economic downturn where only versatile aircraft with a wider profitability window have prevailed.

We can all wish for a rapid recovery, especially for the pilot community, where profitability is second to offered space, but i guess that will remain wishful thinking at least for the near future.
glofish is offline  
Old 4th May 2021, 08:11
  #229 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: overthere
Posts: 2,967
Totally agree.
donpizmeov is offline  
Old 4th May 2021, 18:48
  #230 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 90
A380 Critical Project Appraisal 2002

A lengthy but fascinating read.


Commander Taco is offline  
Old 5th May 2021, 11:38
  #231 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: London
Posts: 184
"In 2002, Aboulafia co-authored with Aaron Gellman a Boeing funded report on the Airbus A380, released in 2004."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Aboulafia
Lord Bracken is offline  
Old 5th May 2021, 11:57
  #232 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: attitude is nominal
Posts: 1,462
Boeing did the same mistake with the 747-8. So it wasn't that obvious beforehand that big airplanes would soon be in trouble. And the 747-8 has even the latest engines.
Less Hair is online now  
Old 5th May 2021, 16:50
  #233 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 1,047
Honestly, there would never have been a 747-8 had not been for the the A-380. Boeing did the minimum to copper its bets, just in case their market appraisal was wrong.
Of course, we all know that 'straightforward' derivatives rarely wind up that way, plus they always cost way more than advertised.
etudiant is offline  
Old 12th May 2021, 16:14
  #234 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Canada
Posts: 561
That's all she wrote: Airbus Will Convert The A380 Production Line To Build The A320 Family Airbus Will Convert The A380 Production Line To Build The A320 Family - Simple Flying
Longtimer is offline  
Old 13th May 2021, 07:21
  #235 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2021
Location: Mars
Posts: 23
More illegally subsidised 320ís for the planet then - great
FredFlintstone is offline  
Old 13th May 2021, 08:28
  #236 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: attitude is nominal
Posts: 1,462
Care to elaborate?
Less Hair is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.