Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Terms and Endearment
Reload this Page >

IAG: BA restructuring may cost 12,000 jobs

Wikiposts
Search
Terms and Endearment The forum the bean counters hoped would never happen. Your news on pay, rostering, allowances, extras and negotiations where you work - scheduled, charter or contract.

IAG: BA restructuring may cost 12,000 jobs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st May 2020, 14:16
  #181 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Spunky Monkey
Fight fire with fire and go on the offensive.
Call a strike, ground the fleet, Pilots first and if CC and others want to join let them.
The country is looking the other way at the moment and aren't able to fly, so you won't hurt the man on the street, however you will hurt management who will be making a plan to get aircraft back in the air.
If T5 is closed, then they are really going to struggle.
The fleet is already grounded so strike is no weapon at all. The remaining flights will be done by management pilots and pilots in their probation period. You should make alternative offers like ze Germans or perhaps an extensive part time option for the more senior (expensive) pilots. Play the press. Sociopaths like MOL, WW or Jeff Bezos and the likes aren't exactly loved at the moment.
Tommy Gavin is offline  
Old 1st May 2020, 14:17
  #182 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: england
Posts: 859
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts


I think BA have opened the bottom drawer of problems they long wanted to fix and thrown it in
wow, if a company making close to 2 billion euros profits has a bottom drawer full of problems, it makes you wonder how on Earth they made that much money ? Also makes you wonder what IAG are going to do to the companies that didn’t generate the vast majority of the profits.
hunterboy is offline  
Old 1st May 2020, 14:19
  #183 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Spunky Monkey
Fight fire with fire and go on the offensive.
Call a strike, ground the fleet, Pilots first and if CC and others want to join let them.
The country is looking the other way at the moment and aren't able to fly, so you won't hurt the man on the street, however you will hurt management who will be making a plan to get aircraft back in the air.
If T5 is closed, then they are really going to struggle.
Is the timing of BA's action not designed to nullify any impact from a potential strike? With almost the whole fleet grounded, most staff furloughed, what impact would it have on management? With demand likely to be very subdued even after lockdown (and that could go on for months and months) BA could fly a skeleton service for an extended period even with a huge strike on its hands. Timing is everything and BA's management does seem to be taking advantage of an 'opportunity' whilst the unions have very limited options.
RTM Boy is offline  
Old 1st May 2020, 14:22
  #184 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Aalborg
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by HZ123
There seems to be a problem on here that many do not seem to grasp the severity of the problem. It is irrelevant the callous management style exercised at the present time. BA staff must be completely aware of the situation and to many it has not come as a surprise. As for personal abusive attacks on WW, that achieves nothing. How do those on here assume that thousands of staff doing nothing can be kept on the payroll until things get better. As for the last post 'call a strike' that is nonsense and the one before calling WW a psychopath should be removed. If threaders cannot contribute sensibly then say nothing. Peoples livelihoods are at stake here!

Normal Redundancies as per current agreements could be understood by anyone in this climate as a necessity but they seem to be taking advantage of the situation to reshape the business in a take it or leave it way. A strike won't achieve much as the Public generally have little sympathy for pilots on £100k plus preventing them from getting where they need to go.
Jamie2009 is offline  
Old 1st May 2020, 14:25
  #185 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Aalborg
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jet2 will be just fine, don't think the words Jet2 and bail out have ever been mentioned once by anyone ever.
Jamie2009 is offline  
Old 1st May 2020, 14:54
  #186 (permalink)  

PPRuNe Person
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: see roster
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jamie2009
Jet2 will be just fine, don't think the words Jet2 and bail out have ever been mentioned once by anyone ever.
This is a thread about BA. No one need mention Jet2.
overstress is offline  
Old 1st May 2020, 15:00
  #187 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: uk
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I don’t think you understand UK employment law. Secondary action is illegal, the Union’s funds would be seized and non BA pilots striking in support would be sacked.
deltahotel is offline  
Old 1st May 2020, 15:15
  #188 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Botswana
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by HZ123
There seems to be a problem on here that many do not seem to grasp the severity of the problem. It is irrelevant the callous management style exercised at the present time. BA staff must be completely aware of the situation and to many it has not come as a surprise. As for personal abusive attacks on WW, that achieves nothing. How do those on here assume that thousands of staff doing nothing can be kept on the payroll until things get better. As for the last post 'call a strike' that is nonsense and the one before calling WW a psychopath should be removed. If threaders cannot contribute sensibly then say nothing. Peoples livelihoods are at stake here!
A psychopath is someone who lacks remorse or empathy, it doesn’t have to mean they’re Ted Bundy, Ed Gein or even Jason Vorhees. How exactly does WW not fit this description?

He’s just put his begging bowl out for Vueling and Iberia (no redundancies so far) but, with an act of gross hypocrisy, refuses to do the same for BA because he’d rather pressure the U.K. government to fail to act and ensure Virgin go under and is willing to use 12,000 of his own staff’s livelihoods and families as collateral damage in that process. Pray tell me again why I’m wrong in my assessment of his character?

(And if you’d read further back in the thread my comments were in response to a post (not quoted) asking how management sleep at night. This was my answer. FYI You’re not the forum police and you don’t get to censor posts because you have failed to understand the meaning of a word or its context)

Last edited by RexBanner; 1st May 2020 at 15:41. Reason: Further info
RexBanner is offline  
Old 1st May 2020, 15:18
  #189 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
BALPA has declared a MAYDAY.

Pilots union sends out a ‘Mayday’ distress call amidst tsunami of job cuts.

Release date: 01/05/2020



The British Airline Pilots Association has issued a ‘Mayday’ distress call for the aviation industry as Ryanair becomes the latest airline to announce potential job cuts and predictions of more to come.

The announcement that 3000 jobs are on the line at Ryanair comes just days after British Airways announced it is also planning 12,000 redundancies.

The pilots’ union says enforced travel restrictions as a result of coronavirus are having a devastating impact on aviation and it is an emergency the Government can no longer ignore.

Before COVID-19 hit the UK aviation brought at least £22 billion to the UK economy, along with over 230,000 jobs.

Airlines contribute enormously to the vibrancy of the UK economy bringing a direct contribution to GDP of £5.2 billion and an overall contribution of £10.9 billion, when the effects of the supply chain and workforce are added.

BALPA is calling for the Government to deliver its package of support to help our airlines though this crisis and protect the multitude of other industries that are indirectly reliant on aviation.

The Government must recognise that global trade and economic recovery will be severely impacted if our world leading aviation industry is allowed to falter, while its competitors are propped up by their governments.

BALPA General Secretary Brian Strutton said:

“Before coronavirus the UK aviation industry was world leading. But now aviation workers are facing a Tsunami of job losses.

“There is no more time for delay. The UK Government should follow the example set by others in Europe and around the world, recognise that aviation is vital to the UK economy and keep to the promise made by the Chancellor on 17 March to help airlines.

“Without swift action, UK aviation will fall behind our global competitors and it simply won’t be there to aid recovery when the demand returns.

“Aviation will suffer, and so too will the industries that rely on aviation indirectly and our ability to trade on a global scale. That can only be bad for the UK economy.

“Around the world we are seeing other governments back their airlines and this will distort the global market place and leave the UK floundering.

“The Government should step in to preserve the future of our national airline industry and work with unions and airlines to prevent the loss of the tens of thousands of jobs that are on the line.

“With full Brexit looming at the end of this year it would be a disaster.”
Airbubba is offline  
Old 1st May 2020, 15:18
  #190 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Dublin
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by HZ123
There seems to be a problem on here that many do not seem to grasp the severity of the problem. It is irrelevant the callous management style exercised at the present time. BA staff must be completely aware of the situation and to many it has not come as a surprise. As for personal abusive attacks on WW, that achieves nothing. How do those on here assume that thousands of staff doing nothing can be kept on the payroll until things get better. As for the last post 'call a strike' that is nonsense and the one before calling WW a psychopath should be removed. If threaders cannot contribute sensibly then say nothing. Peoples livelihoods are at stake here!
The staff understand the severity of the situation and I’m sure aren’t expecting to be fully paid (none I’m aware of currently are) to sit at home doing nothing.
An adult discussion, exploring options such as unpaid leave/sabbaticals, temporary pay cuts, part time working etc would have been a good starting point, rather than pulling out a grenade straight away.
The Foss is online now  
Old 1st May 2020, 15:21
  #191 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: England
Posts: 1,904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BALPA can, through the individual CCs, urge all union members (regardless of airline) to align with a common goal. That wouldn't be secondary action but probably wouldn't be realistic in any case.
Superpilot is offline  
Old 1st May 2020, 15:23
  #192 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Devon
Age: 57
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by HZ123
There seems to be a problem on here that many do not seem to grasp the severity of the problem. It is irrelevant the callous management style exercised at the present time. BA staff must be completely aware of the situation and to many it has not come as a surprise. As for personal abusive attacks on WW, that achieves nothing. How do those on here assume that thousands of staff doing nothing can be kept on the payroll until things get better. As for the last post 'call a strike' that is nonsense and the one before calling WW a psychopath should be removed. If threaders cannot contribute sensibly then say nothing. Peoples livelihoods are at stake here!


^^^^^^^

Agree with this.
sikeano is offline  
Old 1st May 2020, 15:43
  #193 (permalink)  

Controversial, moi?
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,606
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I am retired from BA. I feel for everybody in the aviation world facing massive uncertainty and potentially redundancy.

Assume the company either take loans or government help to keep everybody employed. How does that work given the consensus seems to be it will be a year or more before the aviation industry recovers and the scale of the recovery itself is open to debate? The cost of maintaining everybody in full employment is just not viable for more than a few months.

WW has been referred to as a psychopath. He probably has high psycopathic traits but then that is what makes effective leaders. People with high psychopathic traits can make decisions based purely on facts and logic with emotion not playing the slightest part in decision making. He will not make a decisions because it would be nice to keep everybody employed but will make decisions which ensure IAG/BA survives and is as fit as can be to deal with this worldwide disaster.

It doesn't alter the fact that advantage is being taken of the situation to address the legacy issues which have been a rope around BA's neck for years. This is not the time or place to argue about those issues but the unions have defended them for years. The opportunity is now seen to take an axe to them.

The above is not any sort of defence but an observation from my knowledge and experience of BA and WW.

Good luck to everybody facing such an uncertain and troubling future.
M.Mouse is offline  
Old 1st May 2020, 15:49
  #194 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: edge of reality
Posts: 792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Employees often fail to grasp that the CEO has a list of priorities; The first is that 'The company must still be in business when the sun rises tomorrow.'.
The second is the stock-price
Third; The stock-holders.
Employees don't even come within the top 20. All the 'management-speak' about the employees being the company's greatest asset etc is pure BS.. In the eyes of a CEO, employees are a costly necessity, nothing more.
MungoP is offline  
Old 1st May 2020, 15:52
  #195 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: On the road
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just a point. Psychopaths making auto effective leaders is old codswallop. There do happen to be psychopaths in leadership positions but that is through their self desire. It doesn’t infer in reverse their effectiveness

Interpersonal: They’re manipulative, deceitful, and/or narcissistic.
Affective: They lack remorse, are callous, and may take pleasure in hurting others.
Lifestyle: They’re impulsive, may use illegal substances, and may have disregard for the consequences of their actions.
Antisocial: They are physically aggressive and may have a history of or tendency toward criminal behavior.

sorry massive thread drift...
Cliff Secord is offline  
Old 1st May 2020, 15:56
  #196 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NoelEvans
...
I have been VERY fortunate to have continued flying 'as normal' (although nothing is normal now!). Taxiing past rows of aeroplanes parked and sealed up at almost every airport in several countries and walking through empty terminals with everything closed and almost no lights on, some even becoming dusty after having been thriving terminals only a short while ago, is very, very, very sobering (and weird). If you haven't been able to see it, you probably don't really want to. This problem is much, much bigger than any one of your airlines, no matter how big they are. Best not to become lonely individualists bickering about what someone else might or might not be doing. A lot of pilots are going to be in very 'fragile' situations. Trying to understand each other and if possible support each other would be the most helpful way ahead.
I apologise for quoting myself, but with the bickering that I see on here recently and the stupidity of calls for strikes and 'grounding fleets' (they ARE grounded already, what more do you want???!!!), I feel I need to re-emphasise what I have seen. I see no chance of airlines staying in business with some of those attitudes being bandied about. The industry is on its knees. Stop trying to chop those knees off too. Forget your Ts&Cs. You don't have the fare-paying customers to fund them. And you are unlikely to have for a long time. In the future if I was going to chose which airline ticket to buy, I would far rather pay to fly on an airline where the pilots had done everything to keep the airline in business and as many pilot employed as possible. Auf Wiedersehen.
NoelEvans is offline  
Old 1st May 2020, 16:47
  #197 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: SE England
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by HZ123
There seems to be a problem on here that many do not seem to grasp the severity of the problem. It is irrelevant the callous management style exercised at the present time. BA staff must be completely aware of the situation and to many it has not come as a surprise. As for personal abusive attacks on WW, that achieves nothing. How do those on here assume that thousands of staff doing nothing can be kept on the payroll until things get better. As for the last post 'call a strike' that is nonsense and the one before calling WW a psychopath should be removed. If threaders cannot contribute sensibly then say nothing. Peoples livelihoods are at stake here!
Absolutely right. This terrible situation can only be made worse by intemperate behaviour.
a1anx is offline  
Old 1st May 2020, 16:47
  #198 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: malta
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NoelEvans
In the future if I was going to chose which airline ticket to buy, I would far rather pay to fly on an airline where the pilots had done everything to keep the airline in business and as many pilot employed as possible. Auf Wiedersehen.
To be honest, I'd rather fly an airline which itself tried to keep as many staff employed. And if people had to be layed off, than under the best provisions possible.
the_stranger is offline  
Old 1st May 2020, 16:50
  #199 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Chadderton, UK
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by The Foss
Is that even legal? Making people redundant then rehiring them to do the same job with a completely different contract?
Yes it is legal. It's known informally within HR Departments as the "nuclear option" because whilst an organisation can do this, it does leave the organisation open to unfair dismissal claims.
techwatcher is offline  
Old 1st May 2020, 17:20
  #200 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Originally Posted by MungoP
Employees often fail to grasp that the CEO has a list of priorities; The first is that 'The company must still be in business when the sun rises tomorrow.'.
The second is the stock-price
Third; The stock-holders.
Employees don't even come within the top 20.
So what are the other 17+ priorities that come before employees ?
DaveReidUK is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.