Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

KLM final flight B747

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

KLM final flight B747

Old 29th Mar 2020, 15:12
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Benelux
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
KLM final flight B747

Today KLM Royal Dutch Airlines operated its final Boeing 747 Jumbo Jet passenger flight KL686 from Mexico City to Amsterdam Schiphol.
PH-BFT City of Tokyo was the last KLM B747-4 on duty

They have been phasing out and retiring their 747s. Another sad news for the real Queen of the Sky.
Give this plane a great tribute

https://www.airliners.net/photo/KLM-...-406/5948203/L
tintintin is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2020, 15:52
  #2 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,609
Received 57 Likes on 41 Posts
I'll miss them! Several Atlantic crossings a year, upstairs business class was the best way to go!
Pilot DAR is online now  
Old 29th Mar 2020, 16:12
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: There and here
Posts: 2,849
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
KLm, Qantas, ??? the old lady of the skies is flying into the sunset. How much longer will KLM keep the freighters flying ?
SpringHeeledJack is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2020, 17:22
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Munich, Germany
Age: 80
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts


Will miss her too. She was a jewel in the Bavarian skies. Weather permitting I saw her frequently, always at the same time,
you could set your watch..

BEA 71
BEA 71 is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2020, 18:43
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Europe
Age: 45
Posts: 625
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 747 will live on for many, many years still. In the role she was originally designed for to boot, rather than the degrading existence of shovelling ungrateful punters between continents.
SMT Member is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2020, 19:05
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Balmullo,Scotland
Posts: 932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I flew on one (C class) from AMS-ICN last December as much affection as I have the old girl unfortunately no longer fit for purpose, sorry to see them go but preferred the B787 also on C class last year. Similar thoughts about the B744 MIA-LHR also last year.
matkat is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2020, 23:00
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Singapore
Posts: 320
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seat 1A , on main deck SQ Jumbo ; only way to travel in them days . (also staff travel best ever) . Cabin crew brief ? Your glass shall never be empty .
Phantom Driver is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2020, 23:46
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Phantom Driver
Seat 1A , on main deck SQ Jumbo ; only way to travel in them days .
And from seat 1A you could see down the runway. However, on SQ I preferred to be further back to see the girls.

Originally Posted by Phantom Driver
Cabin crew brief ? Your glass shall never be empty .
Wasn't the first class champagne on SQ either Dom Perignon or Krug?

Airbubba is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2020, 09:54
  #9 (permalink)  
BRE
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by matkat
I flew on one (C class) from AMS-ICN last December as much affection as I have the old girl unfortunately no longer fit for purpose, sorry to see them go but preferred the B787 also on C class last year. Similar thoughts about the B744 MIA-LHR also last year.
What makes her "no longer fit for the purpose" from a pax perspective? The 787 is even noisier on the inside, in my impression.
BRE is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2020, 10:05
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Beyond the Blue Horizon
Age: 63
Posts: 1,237
Received 109 Likes on 65 Posts
Airbubba
DP as with EK , hic !.

Kind regards
Mr Mac
Mr Mac is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2020, 10:24
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Benelux
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 1 Post
I made quite a number of C class flights on KLM 747s. The first row window seats (main cabin) were also my favourite seats, but so they were for many other regulars too. So they were not always mine for the taking! The top deck was not for me as the dimensions of the storage bins next to the window seat were too limiting for my needs.
BRUpax is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2020, 10:28
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by SMT Member
The 747 will live on for many, many years still. In the role she was originally designed for to boot, rather than the degrading existence of shovelling ungrateful punters between continents.
If you mean as a freighter, that is not what it was originally designed for. Juan Trippe of Pan Am wanted a large capacity passenger airliner and Boeing built it for him. True that they used a lot of the work originally put in to Boeing's failed bid for the USAF C5 competition - but the 747 was significantly different from that.
Groundloop is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2020, 10:39
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Netherlands
Age: 46
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Groundloop
True that they used a lot of the work originally put in to Boeing's failed bid for the USAF C5 competition - but the 747 was significantly different from that.
The only reason the flight deck is on the upper deck, is so that it can have a door in the nose for the main deck. I think that is the most significant part of the 747 design.
procede is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2020, 14:29
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: moraira,spain-Norfolk, UK
Age: 82
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Airbubba
And from seat 1A you could see down the runway. However, on SQ I preferred to be further back to see the girls.



Wasn't the first class champagne on SQ either Dom Perignon or Krug?
When I flew the steward remark was - we'll finish the Dom Perignon and then start on the Krug.
Will those days ever return ?
esa-aardvark is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2020, 15:05
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by BRE
What makes her "no longer fit for the purpose" from a pax perspective? The 787 is even noisier on the inside, in my impression.
The market has grown. You don’t have 380 PAX going JFK-LHR and then 50 connect to Rome and 80 connect to Paris and 70 go to FRA and 50 to Stockholm and 70 to Madrid. The airlines today (well, last month) can get 270 people who want to go to each of those destinations direct from JFK. Same out of any major hub. Plus the operating cost of 4 engines v. 2.
MarkerInbound is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2020, 15:16
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Netherlands
Age: 46
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MarkerInbound
The market has grown. You don’t have 380 PAX going JFK-LHR and then 50 connect to Rome and 80 connect to Paris and 70 go to FRA and 50 to Stockholm and 70 to Madrid. The airlines today (well, last month) can get 270 people who want to go to each of those destinations direct from JFK. Same out of any major hub. Plus the operating cost of 4 engines v. 2.
Not really, Hub and spoke is still alive and kicking, and even more hubs have emerged and are connected.
The truth is that high density seating (3-4-3) now makes airlines able to fit the same amount of passengers and even more cargo into a 777-300, which is much more fuel efficient.
procede is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2020, 15:47
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Singapore
Posts: 320
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Airbubba
Wasn't the first class champagne on SQ either Dom Perignon or Krug?
​​​​​​Yes indeed .The good thing about SQ in those days was no restrictions on deadheading crew (i.e off duty ) . You boarded before the pax , generally got F or J if available ( and F/O often upgraded with the Capt ) . Once on board , the first thing you did was change out of uniform and get stuck into the Dom or Krug , as you preferred .

As I fondly recall , the hosty insisted I alone polish off two bottles of DP on a dhd SIN-LHR . Slept well . Happy days on the Jumbo fleet .

Sadly , these protocols were somewhat different on certain ME airlines ; dhd ORD- DOH in Y with only orange juice for sustenance ; not nice....



Phantom Driver is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2020, 16:29
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Singapore
Posts: 320
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Singapore Girl, always a " Great way to Fly " . A pity such ads now consigned to the dustbins of history by the PC/ me too - brigade .
( apologies for the thread drift , but it is synonymous with the 747 era . Who remembers the Braniff 747 girls uniform ? See you on Jet Blast !).
Phantom Driver is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2020, 16:53
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Phantom Driver
Who remembers the Braniff 747 girls uniform ?
Braniff indeed tied the Emilio Pucci uniforms to its 747 service in the ad campaigns.








Airbubba is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2020, 18:40
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The No Transgression Zone
Posts: 2,483
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Braniff seems to have flown everything including Concorde
Pugilistic Animus is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.