Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

FAA investigates cracks on older 737s

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

FAA investigates cracks on older 737s

Old 14th Mar 2020, 02:50
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Bristol, UK
Age: 61
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FAA investigates cracks on older 737s

FAA launches probe after in-flight incident reveals 12-inch crack on 737 jet

(Reuters) - The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) said on Friday it has begun a probe following an in-flight incident involving an older 737 aircraft manufactured by Boeing Co (BA.N) and flown by Southwest Airlines (LUV.N).

The FAA said the aircraft was en route to Boise, Idaho, from Las Vegas on Monday and experienced a gradual loss of cabin pressure at one point before reaching the destination without any injury to the passengers.

An initial inspection of the aircraft by the FAA revealed a 12-inch crack on the crown skin in an area that already requires inspections every 1,500 flight cycles.

The Wall Street Journal reported the aviation safety regulator was investigating potential structural problems affecting hundreds of Boeing 737 jets.

"The aircraft was taken out of service and is currently in maintenance receiving repairs," Southwest said in a statement.
kgbbristol is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2020, 08:51
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: MEL AUS
Posts: 61
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
More lap joint problems?
Redpanda is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2020, 09:40
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: EU
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Makes me think about Aloha, they also had an issue with crown skin...
golfyankeesierra is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2020, 12:44
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: West of Suez
Posts: 336
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I wonder if the increased length of fuselage on many later generation airframes might be a factor in this ?
AnglianAV8R is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2020, 14:47
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by AnglianAV8R
I wonder if the increased length of fuselage on many later generation airframes might be a factor in this ?
More likely that the hoop stress from pressuization is the culprit across a corroded/damaged area (wear-out mode)
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2020, 17:47
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seattle Area
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I assume this was an NG because that's all SWA flies right now.

The areas I'm aware of where large crown skin cracks have occurred are underneath the vertical stabilizer fairings where a rubbing condition can create damage and a stress concentration (I believe this is under an AD-required inspection program, but couldn't quickly find the AD - possibly I'm confusing an issue on another model), at chem-milled steps in the crown skin panels (AD 2013-08-16), and in the areas around some STC-installed inflight entertainment system antenna cutouts (AD 2014-03-19), which have typically been installed in the middle part of the fuselage where crown skin loads are high. I'm assuming this was not a lap splice issue because the report said the crack was in the crown skin. There is no lap joint at the crown. I have not seen anything specific yet related to this report, but the fact that the pressurization system couldn't keep up and it was reported as a 12 inch crack makes me think it was a chem-mill pocket crack that turned the corner of the pocket and opened a flap, which is what the design is intended to do if a crack occurs. I'm guessing, though.
Dave Therhino is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2020, 17:53
  #7 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,613
Received 60 Likes on 43 Posts
Perhaps this TV report is relevant. I have no first hand opinion on the content, I offer it as it was presented to me a few days ago....

Pilot DAR is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2020, 20:49
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dave Therhino
I assume this was an NG because that's all SWA flies right now.
AVHerald reports it to be a -700, N726SW
Swiss51 is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2020, 23:11
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,934
Received 392 Likes on 207 Posts
The report that introduced an AD in 2011, five foot long, Southwest found five other aircraft with issues. DAR, your video seems it may have been produced as a result of this incident, content is somewhat prescient given where we stand with the MAX today.

https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/...ts/AAB1302.pdf



megan is online now  
Old 15th Mar 2020, 10:44
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: The South
Posts: 304
Received 54 Likes on 21 Posts
That video was from Al Jazeera who mdae the documentary "On a Wing and a Prayer" a few years ago. It was shocking then but it even more shocking now, in the light of the issues with the max and the revelations over the Turkish crash.
Timmy Tomkins is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2020, 04:26
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: somewhere in Oz
Age: 54
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If it ain't Boeing, then it ain't blowing...

Last edited by Andy_RR; 16th Mar 2020 at 05:04.
Andy_RR is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2020, 08:46
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: US
Posts: 507
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
I did some research

I watched the documentary, did a quick google search and read the NTSB report on the SWA plane. The documentary was not relevant to the incident plane above which was a very high cycle 300 not an NG. The claims in the second half of the documentary relating the part issues to post accident break up of the fuselage on three hard landings of 737 NG are a stretch.The 707 crash test shown in the documentary was irrelevant. The former FAA expert made claims that the fuselage should not have broken but he provides no basis for that. I don't remember anything mentioned in reports that the fuselage underperformed in the accidents but the operators sure did in each case.
Like AJ's 787 documentary - somewhat over wrought. The people involved filed a whistle blower complaint about the parts sold to the US govt on several models of Boeing's. The lawsuit which was summarily dismissed by the judge. So - draw your own conclusions.

The NTSB report was interesting and as would be expected very thorough. . There was a repair made to a crown panel somewhere between Renton, final assemble and Wichita , where the section was built. This was before Spirit took over the Wichita plant. The repair was badly done. To quote The hole quality in the crown and left side skin panels was not in accordance with Boeing specifications or standard manufacturing practices and showed a lack of attention to detail and extremely poor manufacturing technique.
Not exactly a ringing endorsement of Boeing (unionized ) labor and practices. Brings to mind a poor repair on a pressure bulkhead by Boeing that lead to the loss of a 747.
20driver is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.