Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Flybe in trouble ?

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Flybe in trouble ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Jan 2020, 19:18
  #141 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Leeds
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No offense Axefur but I would imagine the government and HMRC don't see you personally as valuable as they saw flybe, However you make a valid point sir
Livesinafield is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2020, 20:25
  #142 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: big green wheely bin
Posts: 901
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by RexBanner
Because there were multiple alternatives to Thomas Cook and Monarch for passengers. There quite simply aren’t alternatives to Flybe for many of the regions.
so Flybe will never be allowed to go under? No matter how much money they lose?
Jonty is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2020, 20:47
  #143 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: London, UK
Posts: 390
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
if Flybe could find a way to run a jet LHR - ABZ and got their pricing right vis a vis BA......

Trying to compete with a bus (gate closes 20 minutes earlier) a turboprop (add 30 minutes) and tiny overhead bins (wait for your carry on at the other end, another 20 minutes) is not going to get the average oil man on your side.

But most of us would love a viable alternative to the worlds favourite airline.
SLF3 is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2020, 21:10
  #144 (permalink)  

I Have Control
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: North-West England
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good good news. The government have done a good thing.
RoyHudd is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2020, 22:50
  #145 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Deutschland
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RoyHudd
Good good news. The government have done a good thing.
Have you not realised that they are putting up APD for everyone else to finance this or at least that is what I'm reading between the lines on the news reports online tonight.
The government have not done a good thing.

It appears that if the Credit Card Companies shook off the Jedi mind trick from the Consortium that the company was liquid and funded.
I'm still of the opinion that the Consortium put up or brought no money worth speaking about with them and were just working with FlyBE's own working capital for the last 11 months.

We'll never know for certain.
Schoenheit is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2020, 01:52
  #146 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SLF3
if Flybe could find a way to run a jet LHR - ABZ and got their pricing right vis a vis BA......

Trying to compete with a bus (gate closes 20 minutes earlier) a turboprop (add 30 minutes) and tiny overhead bins (wait for your carry on at the other end, another 20 minutes) is not going to get the average oil man on your side.

But most of us would love a viable alternative to the worlds favourite airline.
Little Red did that (Virgin branding operated by EI). Load factors would suggest that you didn't have to many like minded individuals.
MCDU2 is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2020, 03:13
  #147 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: London, UK
Posts: 390
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Little Red had big planes and very poor timings for business travellers. Made no effort to differentiate.

And they competed with Easy for non business travellers prepared to accept crap timings. Easy have gone.

flybe has Embraers and good timings currently: as I understand it they cannot find a way to use the slots effectively with jets.
SLF3 is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2020, 03:34
  #148 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 204
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
I'l reserve judgement until more details of the deal emerge.

My instinct is that the gov't should let them go bust & then take a role in re-creating the socially important bits (basically UK regional domestic). FlyBE have been their own worst enemy to a degree - their online reviews are shocking.

For sure, APD should be scrapped for UK domestic flights. It is absurd that rail is subsidised whilst air is taxed. The pitiful history of the UK domestic air operator sector shows that it needs government help, not a £26 per return pax millstone around its neck!
KeyPilot is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2020, 03:35
  #149 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 204
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Forgot to add, this won't be the end of the FlyBE saga. We will be back here in max 3 years' time, likely sooner...
KeyPilot is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2020, 03:42
  #150 (permalink)  
aox
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 227
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BEagle
No doubt the decision will upset the envirofundamentalists and that irritating Scandewegian Thunderbug child, but it is most definitely the correct, pragmatic solution.
According to one rant on the news, it seems airliners have suddenly taken over from diesel cars as causing the worst pollution.

CO2 emissions from the Q400 are better per passenger km than a car with only one person in, and only marginally more than diesel trains, and it's usually a shorter distance, but facts seem to be somewhat lacking in some of these arguments.
aox is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2020, 03:56
  #151 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by KeyPilot
Forgot to add, this won't be the end of the FlyBE saga. We will be back here in max 3 years' time, likely sooner...
Yes. This is just kicking the can down the road.

cats_five is online now  
Old 15th Jan 2020, 04:00
  #152 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London
Age: 45
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by aox
According to one rant on the news, it seems airliners have suddenly taken over from diesel cars as causing the worst pollution.

CO2 emissions from the Q400 are better per passenger km than a car with only one person in, and only marginally more than diesel trains, and it's usually a shorter distance, but facts seem to be somewhat lacking in some of these arguments.
Diesel cars are better per passenger km then Q400 with only one passenger in. What a comparison in the quote above...
Jumbo2 is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2020, 06:17
  #153 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: A Gaelic Country
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wish flybe the very best.

Back in the 90s it was a nightmare getting home to Belfast from Inverness: either Logan from Glasgow or BA from LHR. And both expensive. Christmas was a very special nightmare 🤣 Remember the cops pulling me over on the A9 to tell me that they would probably be shutting the snow gates...stupidly perhaps, with family onboard I pushed on to Glasgow. RAF aircrew & CSRO: invincible 🤣👌 (OK. Stupid).

Now flybe go direct INS BFS. Grand!
covec is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2020, 07:26
  #154 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Somerset
Posts: 182
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ATSA1
..and there lies the problem...

Low cost airlines have radically changed the travelling public's idea of what a "proper" air fare should be.

If fares had risen in line with inflation since, say, 1985, fares would generally be around 30-40% higher than they are now. but Joe Public expects to get to the Costas or even Paris or Amsterdam for under £100 rtn.

Too many airlines chasing too few passengers prepared to pay the going rate, and so they are all in a race to the bottom, and sooner or later, they will all perish...

Flybe is just another airline going down that route....

its not nice writing this, but its the uncomfortable truth...
And yet easyjet and Ryanair are profitable and expanding with the correct business model.
Blackfriar is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2020, 07:32
  #155 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Home
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As an aside, if APD is all about the environment, then surely domestic flights, where the car and train are an option, are the very ones it should apply to? On the other hand, if it’s just a money grab, like insurance taxes and stamp duty, then maybe politicians should be more honest about the motives behind some of the taxes that are legitimised by the green lobby, but do nothing to change behaviour.
Plankwing is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2020, 07:46
  #156 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: SW1A 2AA
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can anyone point to anything that has ever been done with the revenue generated by APD to protect the environment?

At the very best, the only environmental impact is that it may possibly stop a few people from flying. But you can bet those aircraft flew anyway.
Rt Hon Jim Hacker MP is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2020, 08:16
  #157 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In how many of it's routes do Flybe face competition?

They are the only carrier on EDI-BHX, they should be able to make money there as even with check-in etc. it's slightly quicker than the train and than driving, and it's a long and tedious drive. It's also easier for many people to get to EDI than Edinburgh or Haymarket stations for the first flight especially at a weekend.

cats_five is online now  
Old 15th Jan 2020, 08:18
  #158 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Leeds
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its far more efficient to transport 70 people on a Q400 45 min sector than to have 70 people drive it, Like most things Tax's including APD is just that tax, a revenue generator for the treasury, serves no other purpose, when you look at it its pretty outrageous Flybe and other airlines are having to find that sort of money when aviation is challenging enough.

I'm all for protecting the environment and climate when we can, but this country is going nuts, if we continue with this path we are going to disadvantage ourselves from everyone else around the world, we will destroy our own infrastructure and economy.

They are the only carrier on EDI-BHX
BHX is one of Flybe's most profitable base's load factors there are very high and they face little to no competition
Livesinafield is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2020, 08:37
  #159 (permalink)  
c52
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Surrey
Posts: 2,262
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
APD can be seen as a substitute for tax on aviation fuel. Or VAT.
c52 is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2020, 08:48
  #160 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London
Age: 45
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by c52
APD can be seen as a substitute for tax on aviation fuel. Or VAT.
If the service they operate is so vital surely they could charge more. If people are not willing to pay the extra to make a route viable one has to wonder how vital a route is.

I’m afraid I’m more subscribing to Mr Walsh his view regarding the government help provided to keep FlyBE a going concern.
Jumbo2 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.