Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Flybe in trouble ?

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Flybe in trouble ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Jan 2020, 07:10
  #81 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Leeds
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ExpectmorePayless
If a government handout (from taxpayers that's you and I), then I'd rather the government buy the whole lot for £2.4 million as was the most recent purchase price and nationalise it for a future sell off rather like the banks.
What I am opposed to is a government bailout to private equity firms and multi billionaire owners, for them to continue to run a failing business and reward themselves huge salaries, bonuses and siphon off capital into third party holding companies.
The hard working frontline staff deserve better than these greedy owners and their overpaid, inept and failing management.
I don't think it's a Handout, it's just some relief from the "environmental" tax for a while I guess until they can try and sort it all out, they are currently undergoing a big turn around plan to try and get it back to profitability, there have been some fairly big changes but it's only been 6 months, hopefully it works
Livesinafield is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2020, 07:23
  #82 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: STN
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Best of luck to Flybe and its staff. They are (for me) a convenient way to get from London to Aberdeen. A bit pricey but that's the price of convenience, no?

The only "issue" I've ever had is when LCY was not allowing anyone to land due to weather. The Flybe reps kept us informed, helped me re-book for free when I decided that my trip wasn't worth doing - 90% of the time I go to Aberdeen I fly back same-day. On a day of chaos they were professional and courteous.

Every time I have flown with them I've had no complaints whatsoever.
bucoops is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2020, 07:40
  #83 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Limbricht
Posts: 2,194
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Until experiencing a fair number of delays, cancellations and poor customer service (not from the excellent front line crews I must add), I was a fairly regular user of Flybe. For the reasons given I completely stopped using them from mid 2014. Fortunately the route I traveled most frequently offered me other options. Having said that I would prefer to see the personnel keep their jobs and for the airline to survive and flourish again. Good luck to all.
Avman is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2020, 07:53
  #84 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Uk
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RoyHudd
Some very stupid postings above. BE do not "deserve to go bust" because of some high fares. Perhaps Tinwald's company deserve to go bust for some arbitrary reason. Not nice for employees to read.

As for the idiot who cites unfeasible routings like BRS-NQY being expensive, he/she needs to shut up. Imagine how much a LGW-LHR costs by air, (via say GLA) compared to the bus fare?

And they and others are unable to spell. Or identify an airline...BEE? Dear God.

Wow, I’ve flown with some guys over the years with suspect CRM qualities, but I think you’d probably surpass them all...... Dear God!!......
Pumal1w is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2020, 08:13
  #85 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: up north
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From a north-east perspective, it has never ceased to amaze me how competitive Flybe fares are compared with the train. Travelling to and from the NE to the Midlands, South and South West, the trains are slow, extremely expensive, overcrowded, squalid, usually late and recently mostly cancelled. I have saved £000's by flying to EXE or SOU rather than taking the train. However, that has been because of my own research rather than any brand awareness building by Flybe. Their marketing has been completely ineffective.
Hipennine is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2020, 08:19
  #86 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Spain and Gibraltar
Posts: 155
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RoyHudd

As for the idiot who cites unfeasible routings like BRS-NQY being expensive, he/she needs to shut up. Imagine how much a LGW-LHR costs by air, (via say GLA) compared to the bus fare?
This from the objectionable Roy Hudd character who has to stand corrected for his ineptitude.

There is nothing idiotic for a visiting non UK resident to look up available routes from one place to another, most people do this when in foreign parts.
Politeness within these forums goes a long way, perhaps Mr. Hudd should address the forum rules that relate to ad hominem
Nil by mouth is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2020, 08:22
  #87 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: the edge of madness
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Presumably fairly catastrophic for airports like EXT and SOU at least in the short term but I don't suppose they have the financial wherewithal to help the airline significantly. Layoffs followed by pitches to other carriers to try to pick up the slack but it would take time - especially as nobody else has the right equipment. Fingers Xd for all involved.
Torquelink is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2020, 08:33
  #88 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: East Midlands
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The reported delayed APD payments amounts to a similar sum to the original proposed bailout from Connect. So did Connect Airways (Cyrus / Stobart / Virgin) put in the promised £100m? Or did the promise of a takeover release the credit card acquirers' withholdings and enable Flybe to carry on until now without a massive injection of cash? Or a combination of the two? Or was the promised cash injection smoke and mirrors and funding may now end up coming from the public purse rather than the consortium?
EastMids is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2020, 08:47
  #89 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: leeds
Age: 77
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by EastMids
The reported delayed APD payments amounts to a similar sum to the original proposed bailout from Connect. So did Connect Airways (Cyrus / Stobart / Virgin) put in the promised £100m? Or did the promise of a takeover release the credit card acquirers' withholdings and enable Flybe to carry on until now without a massive injection of cash? Or a combination of the two? Or was the promised cash injection smoke and mirrors and funding may now end up coming from the public purse rather than the consortium?
Yes these are good questions. Others are what the carbon tax element of APD ought to be for short haul, and what the Govt would need to do in terms of PSO if the whole network went under. Maybe the biggest question surrounds the medium term financial sustainability of the operation if a deferral is granted. That's more fundamental than immediate liquidity.
anothertyke is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2020, 08:51
  #90 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Uk
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Nil by mouth
This from the objectionable Roy Hudd character who has to stand corrected for his ineptitude.

There is nothing idiotic for a visiting non UK resident to look up available routes from one place to another, most people do this when in foreign parts.
Politeness within these forums goes a long way, perhaps Mr. Hudd should address the forum rules that relate to ad hominem

100% agree Sir 👍🏻👍🏻
Pumal1w is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2020, 08:55
  #91 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: SW1A 2AA
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the government do some sort of deal that helps FlyBe out of their current mess then there will be calls from all the other competitors for the same treatment.

Solving one problem will only create many others. O’Leary will go nuts as will BA, EasyJet and anyone else that offers domestic flights. And rightly so.

Rt Hon Jim Hacker MP is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2020, 09:13
  #92 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rt Hon Jim Hacker MP
If the government do some sort of deal that helps FlyBe out of their current mess then there will be calls from all the other competitors for the same treatment.

Solving one problem will only create many others. O’Leary will go nuts as will BA, EasyJet and anyone else that offers domestic flights. And rightly so.
It won’t even be only from current airlines. It wouldn’t surprise me if question will be asked by ex shareholders from companies who have gone bust in the last few years. Those that asked the government for help and were sent packing.

I appreciate that some Flybe services are essential but the government would be better placed to financially support these few routes and have Eastern, Loganair etc. operate them.
CEJM is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2020, 09:13
  #93 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: England
Posts: 520
Received 307 Likes on 124 Posts
Originally Posted by Rt Hon Jim Hacker MP
Solving one problem will only create many others. O’Leary will go nuts as will BA, EasyJet and anyone else that offers domestic flights. And rightly so.
Let them take over FlyBe's routes then - ALL of them - and see if they can provide the same excellent service.
Sallyann1234 is online now  
Old 14th Jan 2020, 09:23
  #94 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Leeds
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rt Hon Jim Hacker MP
If the government do some sort of deal that helps FlyBe out of their current mess then there will be calls from all the other competitors for the same treatment.

Solving one problem will only create many others. O’Leary will go nuts as will BA, EasyJet and anyone else that offers domestic flights. And rightly so.

Actually Flybe in theory should be going nuts, paying the same amount of "environment" Tax as Ryanair BA and Easy, yet in a far far more eco friendly aircraft... that seems fair too
Livesinafield is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2020, 09:26
  #95 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: SW1A 2AA
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If FlyBe are losing money with their current routes and structures why would anybody want to take it over? They might be able to sell off any profitable bits but at this stage it is nothing more than a fire sale. As has always happened, the competition will wait until they can pick off the bits they want from the liquidators.

Hopefully they can find a way/backer but it is not the government’s job to prop up loss making airlines.
Rt Hon Jim Hacker MP is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2020, 09:26
  #96 (permalink)  

I Have Control
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: North-West England
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Politeness aside, I earnestly hope Flybe survive. The APD solution may be the way forward, which would save the government's face and enable 2000 aviation jobs to continue, as well as improving the lot of UK airlines. Having 3 times lost a flying job due to inept management and government intransigence, I am well aware of the misery that sudden unemployment brings.

Unpleasant comments along the lines of " they deserve to go bust", and "it takes 9 hours to fly from Bristol to Newquay and is very expensive compared to the bus" are unhelpful and even hurtful to those folks clinging on to their job hopes.

As for my CRM, irrelevant to the thread, just personal remarks made to express the writers' annoyance. No big deal, and as I say, irrelevant.
RoyHudd is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2020, 09:27
  #97 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: IRS NAV ONLY
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Livesinafield
Actually Flybe in theory should be going nuts, paying the same amount of "environment" Tax as Ryanair BA and Easy, yet in a far far more eco friendly aircraft... that seems fair too
Q400 has better fuel economy per passenger than A320/B737?
FlyingStone is online now  
Old 14th Jan 2020, 09:32
  #98 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Leeds
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FlyingStone
Q400 has better fuel economy per passenger than A320/B737?
For sure, especially on a 45 min sector
Livesinafield is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2020, 09:35
  #99 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Uk
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RoyHudd
Politeness aside, I earnestly hope Flybe survive. The APD solution may be the way forward, which would save the government's face and enable 2000 aviation jobs to continue, as well as improving the lot of UK airlines. Having 3 times lost a flying job due to inept management and government intransigence, I am well aware of the misery that sudden unemployment brings.

Unpleasant comments along the lines of " they deserve to go bust", and "it takes 9 hours to fly from Bristol to Newquay and is very expensive compared to the bus" are unhelpful and even hurtful to those folks clinging on to their job hopes.

As for my CRM, irrelevant to the thread, just personal remarks made to express the writers' annoyance. No big deal, and as I say, irrelevant.
I agree, irrelevant to the thread.

However, my comments, and those of other posters too I understand, were referring only to your general tone, not to the fortunes of Flybe.

Pumal1w is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2020, 09:37
  #100 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: SW1A 2AA
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Livesinafield
Actually Flybe in theory should be going nuts, paying the same amount of "environment" Tax as Ryanair BA and Easy, yet in a far far more eco friendly aircraft... that seems fair too
If we are going to get pedantic then let’s be clear about this argument. FlyBe do not pay the APD. They collect it from the customer and pass it on to HMRC. It is not their money.
Rt Hon Jim Hacker MP is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.