Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Amsterdam Schiphol - security 'event' on airplane

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Amsterdam Schiphol - security 'event' on airplane

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Nov 2019, 11:12
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: 30 Miles from the A1
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Flight Alloy, there are mechanisms to alert ground agencies on some operators aircraft of an on board situation. Clearly any hijacker of note would know about 7500. To describe them would be stupid on an open forum. Might be an idea not to be so patronising......
2Planks is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2019, 18:21
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Craggy Island
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
https://youtu.be/UNW8ZylB_rk

DND delivery is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2019, 17:24
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Tana
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What was the F-16 doing in all that? "Scrambling fighters" looks good on the news but seriously, what would it do if it was real? Shoot down a passenger jet over a European capital? I believe the incessant scaremongering goes WAY too far in Europe.
UltraFan is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2019, 17:57
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,810
Received 199 Likes on 92 Posts
Originally Posted by UltraFan
What was the F-16 doing in all that? "Scrambling fighters" looks good on the news but seriously, what would it do if it was real?
While the possible hijack scenario was still live, that was exactly the right thing to do.

Shoot down a passenger jet over a European capital?
Under some circumstances, that could be the least worst option.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2019, 18:08
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Tana
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
While the possible hijack scenario was still live, that was exactly the right thing to do.

Under some circumstances, that could be the least worst option.
Such as? What possible "circumstance" could warrant killing hundreds of people over stupid hysteria? History shows that hijackers just want to go from A to B and always let the hostages go. Exceptions are so rare and far between that I can't even think of one. (Yeah, yeah, yeah, 9-11, one instance in 112 years of aviation.)
UltraFan is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2019, 00:34
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,810
Received 199 Likes on 92 Posts
Originally Posted by UltraFan
Such as? What possible "circumstance" could warrant killing hundreds of people over stupid hysteria? History shows that hijackers just want to go from A to B and always let the hostages go. Exceptions are so rare and far between that I can't even think of one. (Yeah, yeah, yeah, 9-11, one instance in 112 years of aviation.)
I think you have just answered your own question.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2019, 02:03
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Age: 56
Posts: 953
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by UltraFan
Such as? What possible "circumstance" could warrant killing hundreds of people over stupid hysteria? History shows that hijackers just want to go from A to B and always let the hostages go. Exceptions are so rare and far between that I can't even think of one. (Yeah, yeah, yeah, 9-11, one instance in 112 years of aviation.)
Shooting down the 2 that went into the towers would have saved 2500 people directly.
hans brinker is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2019, 06:11
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The Hague
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by UltraFan
What was the F-16 doing in all that? "Scrambling fighters" looks good on the news but seriously, what would it do if it was real? Shoot down a passenger jet over a European capital? I believe the incessant scaremongering goes WAY too far in Europe.
Coincidence that the F-16 was in the air (according to a fact checking podcast from Nu). In Oct-Dec, the low light conditions in the early evening are used to practice/refresh low light flying, use of night vision goggles....
Winterapfel is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2019, 07:26
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: A place in the sun
Age: 82
Posts: 1,261
Received 46 Likes on 18 Posts
UltraFan,

If Air France 8969 had not been stopped in Marseille the hijackers were going to crash it into the centre of Paris.

Rather like 9/11 don't you think?

Bergerie1 is online now  
Old 10th Nov 2019, 08:44
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Introduced some humour in my post, following a trend, but the post was taken down even though mine was the funniest. I will leave out the humor & say, simply, again, whatever the trigger , the response was quick & firm. Well done AMS making Schipol look damn safe to me. 9-11 lessons are being learned.
Landflap is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2019, 11:02
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Tana
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by hans brinker
Shooting down the 2 that went into the towers would have saved 2500 people directly.
Would it? How about the people onboard? How about the people on the ground it would fall on? How about the resulting fire on the ground? How many would that kill?
UltraFan is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2019, 11:09
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Tana
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bergerie1
UltraFan,

If Air France 8969 had not been stopped in Marseille the hijackers were going to crash it into the centre of Paris.

Rather like 9/11 don't you think?
No, I don't think so. You say like it's a fact. The "Paris bombing plot" was just a figment of French military imagination and US-UK journalists' love for mass hysteria.
UltraFan is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2019, 11:11
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Tana
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Landflap
the response was quick & firm.
Yes, that's the words they need for the next election. Keep saying that.
UltraFan is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2019, 11:24
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Tana
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
I think you have just answered your own question.
The problem with your way of thinking is that trigger happy fighters lead by scared and war-crazed commanders WILL lead to tragedy. And it's not just an assumption. Just remember the A300 Americans shot down in the Persian Gulf. Just like in Amsterdam, nobody cared to think for one second. Just "send the fighters" and "start a war". Gosh, I hate to admit it but Macron is right - NATO is brain-dead.
UltraFan is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2019, 11:59
  #35 (permalink)  

"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: England
Age: 77
Posts: 4,137
Received 221 Likes on 64 Posts
UltraFan.
Gosh, I hate to admit it but Macron is right - NATO is brain-dead.
What the h*ll has this thread got to do with NATO?
Herod is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2019, 14:16
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Age: 56
Posts: 953
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by UltraFan
Would it? How about the people onboard? How about the people on the ground it would fall on? How about the resulting fire on the ground? How many would that kill?
They were dead either way.
​​​​​Probably less than 2500 using UAL93 as a reference.
Never said that shooting down every hijacked airplane should be the first solution, but in the case of 9/11 over 90% of the casualties were on the ground.
hans brinker is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2019, 15:46
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The Hague
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tried to reply this morning, so far not published yet. The F-16 taking to the sky was a coincidence, not related to the possible hijack.
F-16 was starting low light exercise, use of night vision goggles.
Winterapfel is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2019, 15:46
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: 30 Miles from the A1
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Shooting down a civilian airliner will never be a NATO task. It is a national responsibility. In some countries the use of lethal force is a political decision, in others it has been delegated to the military commanders.
2Planks is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2019, 16:48
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Tana
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Winterapfel
Tried to reply this morning, so far not published yet. The F-16 taking to the sky was a coincidence, not related to the possible hijack.
F-16 was starting low light exercise, use of night vision goggles.
It was posted. I saw it above. Thanks for the information. I sure hope the Netherlands is a smart country.
UltraFan is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2019, 20:16
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Age: 58
Posts: 1,904
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I muss say that I'm having a hard time believing this one. Am I correct that the plane was still at the gate and not boarded?
atakacs is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.