Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

737NGs have cracked 'pickle forks' after finding several in the jets.

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

737NGs have cracked 'pickle forks' after finding several in the jets.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Oct 2019, 04:24
  #101 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Actual AD.

http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Gu...2019-20-02.pdf
B727223Fan is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2019, 11:41
  #102 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Perth, WESTERN AUSTRALIA
Age: 71
Posts: 888
Received 17 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Takwis
The first article I read on the pickle forks (sorry, can't find it now) said that originally, the part was cut from billet aluminum, creating a lot of waste. It also had to then be shipped to a subcontractor on California for 'normalization'. The new forks are forged, (not cast), and 'don't need to be normalized', or shipped to California. (I suspect that maybe they still do.)

Aha! From Waterpilot's comment (#10) above: "To increase materials efficiency, the main component of the pickle fork is now produced out of forged, restrike aluminum. Previously the part was produced from block aluminum, which generated a significant amount of scrap because the pickle fork component was cut and shaped from the block. The pickle fork forgings now arrive in the approximate shape of the component so less aluminum is scrapped. In addition, the type of aluminum previously used for the pickle fork required shipping to California for stress relieving and return back to Auburn for continued production. The current aluminum forgings do not require stress treatment."
Interesting that, restrike.
The restrike die operation is, fundamentally, a solid forming operation. The main difference is that a restrike die is used after most of the major forming already has been performed suggesting that the components may still start life as block aluminium / aluminum.
WingNut60 is online now  
Old 4th Oct 2019, 12:45
  #103 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Switzerland
Age: 78
Posts: 109
Received 7 Likes on 2 Posts
The AD that calls for repetitive inspections on a large lot of 737 is out and can be read here
http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Gu...2019-20-02.pdf
clearedtocross is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2019, 12:50
  #104 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by clearedtocross
The AD that calls for repetitive inspections on a large lot of 737 is out and can be read here
http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Gu...2019-20-02.pdf
That's a whole lot of 737s.
aterpster is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2019, 14:39
  #105 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Seattle
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by GordonR_Cape
The patent for pickle forks as aircraft wing-to-fuselage joint dates to 2013: https://patents.google.com/patent/US20150097076A1/en
That patent is for an 'active' suspension system. See below:

The pickle fork diagram is included as a description of prior art. And probably predates this patent by some years.
EEngr is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2019, 14:45
  #106 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Seattle
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by WingNut60
Interesting that, restrike.
The restrike die operation is, fundamentally, a solid forming operation. The main difference is that a restrike die is used after most of the major forming already has been performed suggesting that the components may still start life as block aluminium / aluminum.
Or as a casting in the approximate size/shape of the finished part.

aluminum.
There's the problem. It lost an 'i' somewhere in the process.
EEngr is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2019, 17:03
  #107 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: leftcoast
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The pickle fork diagram is included as a description of prior art. And probably predates this patent by some years.
Some years = approx 40 years or maybe more and generally still in use
Grebe is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2019, 20:17
  #108 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Canada
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The FAA says the inspection would only take an hour. Is that accurate?
Longtimer is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2019, 20:44
  #109 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Rocket City
Posts: 46
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by aterpster
That's a whole lot of 737s.
It's all of the 373NGs.
The immediate action for 30k cycles, and the rest within 1000 cycles.
Then there the repeat inspection every 3500 cycles.

would be interesting to see the Boeing Multi-Operator Message MOM-MOM-19-0536-01B.
I'm assuming that's not public.
ST Dog is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2019, 20:45
  #110 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Rocket City
Posts: 46
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Longtimer
The FAA says the inspection would only take an hour. Is that accurate?
The AD says 1hr. I'm sure that number comes from Boeing.
ST Dog is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2019, 21:04
  #111 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Canada
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ST Dog
The AD says 1hr. I'm sure that number comes from Boeing.
Perhaps but maybe someone in the "REAL" world will share their experience and perhaps what has to be removed to uncover the "pickles" .
Longtimer is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2019, 21:31
  #112 (permalink)  
568
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Castletown
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Regarding the Boeing MOM:

From the FAA AD itself:
"This service information also provides procedures for reporting inspection results to Boeing. This service information is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section".

Companies have access to the MOM (which is sent to the relevant operators) and actions for reporting back to Boeing when the inspections have been made.
This information isn't normally shared to the public.
568 is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2019, 23:42
  #113 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: shiny side up
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Basically, they have to check ALL 737's to determine the extent of the issue.

Film at 11
Smythe is offline  
Old 5th Oct 2019, 02:24
  #114 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seattle Area
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The AD requires eventual inspection of all aircraft with more than 22,600 flight cycles. The FAA in the AD preamble estimated that to currently be about 1900 of the NG airplanes.

The part of the pickle fork fitting that is required to be inspected is exposed in the top forward corners of the wheel wells. With all the equipment installed near that location, it is not possible to get your head into positions that allow an adequate direct visual inspection of each of the fittings. Photos of that area that are adequate to detect the cracks have been taken by holding a cell phone up in that area. The AD requires an inspection using a borescope. There is no work required to gain access for the inspection. You just need a ladder and a borescope. It can be done in less than one hour. If you find a crack you are grounded until an approved repair is made.
Dave Therhino is offline  
Old 5th Oct 2019, 02:28
  #115 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seattle Area
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Boeing MOM referenced in the AD is available to the public in the public rule making docket, which can be viewed at:

https://www.regulations.gov/document...2019-0711-0002
Dave Therhino is offline  
Old 5th Oct 2019, 03:24
  #116 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: leftcoast
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dave Therhino
The Boeing MOM referenced in the AD is available to the public in the public rule making docket, which can be viewed at:

https://www.regulations.gov/document...2019-0711-0002

Just my opinion based on a fair amount of background re fasteners, holes, coldworking, tooling, and a very very small bit of repair issues

First- thanks to dave for the document complete with pics

second - I will draw your attention to the FACT that it was/is the Fail safe strap portion of the PF - not the PF- as the scare press would infer-

third- note that most - many NG will need nothing done/inspected till the next check - and an estimate of 1 hour for inspection is not unreasonable- which does not count time to possibly clean area, maybe take photos and complete paperwork.

Fourth - Even assuming the crack went to both holes and to both edges, the ' wings' will not fall off since the larger bolts ABOVE the smaller ones take the load. Under that event, then a major rework of some type might well be needed.

Fifth - the obvious cure to prevent such happening would be during production to ensure at time of assembly, the holes in that area be drilled, coldworked, reamed, and interference fit bolts installed. A few extra steps- relatively easy to do during assembly at wichita. It is possible that such coldworking was supposed to be done- but was missed since it involves an extra drill and ream operation during assembly. No easy way to ensure it was done.

I'll refer you to my post number 11 in this thread for more details

28th Sep 2019, 07:45
#11 (permalink)






Grebe is offline  
Old 5th Oct 2019, 04:03
  #117 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seattle Area
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Grebe - regarding your second point: Some of the initially inspected airplanes had both the pickle fork fitting outer chord AND the fail safe strap cracked in a given location. This is mentioned in the AD discussion section. It's shown in the first page of pictures in the Boeing document as well.
Dave Therhino is offline  
Old 5th Oct 2019, 04:16
  #118 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: leftcoast
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dave Therhino
Grebe - regarding your second point: Some of the initially inspected airplanes had both the pickle fork fitting outer chord AND the fail safe strap cracked in a given location. This is mentioned in the AD discussion section. It's shown in the first page of pictures in the Boeing document as well.

True but my point in #4 I believe still applies

Fourth - Even assuming the crack went to both holes and to both edges, the ' wings' will not fall off since the larger bolts ABOVE the smaller ones take the load. Under that event, then a major rework of some type might well be needed.
And I do not recall - perhaps missed it that if " a crack " was found - planes would be grounded ( ferry flight only )
Grebe is offline  
Old 5th Oct 2019, 06:37
  #119 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: BHX LXR ASW
Posts: 2,271
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Could someone tell me the difference between a 737NG and a 737-800. Also I see there are different varients of the 800 version. For example Egyptair fly the 866 varient. Is it to do with range?
crewmeal is offline  
Old 5th Oct 2019, 11:40
  #120 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Devon
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by crewmeal
Could someone tell me the difference between a 737NG and a 737-800. Also I see there are different varients of the 800 version. For example Egyptair fly the 866 varient. Is it to do with range?
866 is a Customer Code which identifies an 800 Series for Egyptair. A United Airlines 800 would be an 824 for example. It’s a method Boeing uses to sort out and customise technical manuals etc.
Viscount Way is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.