Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

AIC191 turnround and DIV into STN

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

AIC191 turnround and DIV into STN

Old 27th Jun 2019, 10:22
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Manchester
Age: 45
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AIC191 turnround and DIV into STN

Mods feel free to move this elsewhere if not appropriate.

Only spotted this I was just having a nosy on FR24.

BOM-EWR turned back somewhere just over the NI coast.

Followed it as I thought it was going into LHR but went into STN. Don't know what it was squawking.

Last edited by Ex Cargo Clown; 27th Jun 2019 at 10:36.
Ex Cargo Clown is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2019, 10:33
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: UK, Paris, Peckham, New York
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stn closed, fighters overhead, the QRA boys have doubled their monthly flying allowance this month at stn!

reuters reporting bomb threat
UAV689 is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2019, 10:34
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: The Harvest Moon
Posts: 2,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wondered what the noise was.... just seen a Typhoon zoom climbing away after circling a few times.
Rocket Ron is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2019, 10:37
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: EGSS
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice QRA Typhoon fly-by down 04. AI 777 now hidden away on the 500 stands Northside.
Flightmech is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2019, 10:44
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: UK
Age: 66
Posts: 144
Received 17 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Flightmech
Nice QRA Typhoon fly-by down 04. AI 777 now hidden away on the 500 stands Northside.
would this have been the cause of a sonic boom reportedly heard over Derby this morning?
golfbananajam is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2019, 11:06
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: EGSS
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes I would assume so!
Flightmech is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2019, 12:09
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: NI
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Given the prospect of a couple of frisky Typhoons turning-up and providing missile-armed menace, I do wonder why any pilot would declare a 'security issue' instead of just claiming to have a technical or procedural problem...

"Silly us, we have some passengers who don't have their visas in order. Diverting to Stanners."
El Bunto is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2019, 12:12
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ireland
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by golfbananajam
would this have been the cause of a sonic boom reportedly heard over Derby this morning?
Typhoons came from Coningsby in Lincolnshire so would have had to fly over Derbyshire to intercept AI191 inbound from the North-West.
Speed of Sound is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2019, 12:27
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: UK
Age: 66
Posts: 144
Received 17 Likes on 8 Posts
Flightmech and Speed of Sound thanks

El Bunto what do you know that we don't that suggests there was a technical issue which resulted in the escorted return to Stansted or are you just mouthing off? I'm sure no professional pilot would declare a Sy incident if they didn't believe they have one
golfbananajam is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2019, 12:31
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,426
Received 111 Likes on 60 Posts
Originally Posted by golfbananajam
I'm sure no professional pilot would declare a Sy incident if they didn't believe they have one
You might want to re-read the post to which you are referring. It doesn't say what you think it does.

DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2019, 14:07
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Manchester
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dog seems unfazed

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-eng...nglish_regions
exmanman is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2019, 14:12
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ireland
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Air India initially described it as a bomb threat on Twitter then deleted the Tweet and have subsequently described it as a ‘security incident’.

Probably nothing more suspicious than an Air India PR person pointing out that using the word ‘bomb’ in conjunction with ‘flight’ does not do much for passenger confidence.
Speed of Sound is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2019, 23:04
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 1,459
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news...-bomb-11667010

NEW DELHI/LONDON: An Air India passenger plane flying to the United States was escorted by British fighter jets to land in London on Thursday (Jun 27) after what an official at the airline later said was a hoax bomb threat.

Air India said flight AI 191 from Mumbai to Newark had made a precautionary landing at London Stansted Airport after a hoax telephone call was made to Mumbai airport.The official told Reuters there was no security threat.

Britain scrambled Typhoon fighters at supersonic speed to intercept the Boeing 777-337 and safely escorted it to Stansted, which briefly closed its runway.

The Air India plane was directed to an isolated stand with police in attendance.

"An Air India Boeing 777 diverted into London Stansted Airport at approximately 1015 and landed safely with Essex Police in attendance. It is parked on an isolated stand away from the normal airport operations," the airport said."Our runway has now re-opened and is fully operational following a precautionary landing of Air India flight," it said.
British police said officers were making enquiries.



Source: Reuters/na
krismiler is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2019, 23:35
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why would they use STN for this rather than a quieter regional airport or a military airfield further North?
david340r is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2019, 23:42
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 1,459
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Stansted is the designated emergency airport for London and is planned and equipped to deal issues such as this.
krismiler is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2019, 23:43
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,426
Received 111 Likes on 60 Posts
Originally Posted by david340r
Why would they use STN for this rather than a quieter regional airport or a military airfield further North?
For reasons that are probably best not discussed here, Stansted is the nominated airfield for security-related diversions (see also the Jet2 incident a few days ago).
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2019, 23:44
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,899
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by david340r
Why would they use STN for this rather than a quieter regional airport or a military airfield further North?
Here's a recent article on the subject:

https://home.bt.com/news/uk-news/why...11364217865581
Airbubba is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.