Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Atlas Air 767 down/Texas

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Atlas Air 767 down/Texas

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Apr 2019, 07:47
  #861 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Under the sea
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dark Knight
Re post 850 from a reliable source.

My thoughts.

Did not fly the 767 however, checking Captain Google images, the TOGA (Go Round) switches (as in most Boeings) are positioned such they require a premeditated, definite decision/action to trigger them.

I suggest it is almost impossible to do this when correctly selecting a flap reposition particularly should one have been properly trained: i.e. when selecting a flap reposition from the Left seat the hand always goes under the pilot flying (F/O's) arm. This prevents the Left seat pilot's arm getting in the way of the Pilot Flying (F/O) use of the thrust levers.
Further the hand/arm would not be anywhere near the TOGA switches.

Had for some reason TOGA had been initiated one would think autothrust would be immediately disconnected to maintain the required flight path/remain in control of the aircraft. Or is the required flight path was not able to be maintained a go round carried out.

This should be a fairly standard procedure which all training would demonstrate.
What do you recommend for a "go round" at 6000' when flying a STAR?
extreme P is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2019, 13:31
  #862 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: US
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 767 Go-Around switches are in a different position than the one's on the 737NG and 777. The 737NG and 777 are forward of your hand and are activated by your finger tips. On the 767, if you let your throttle hand thumb relax and lower, it's in about the right position to engage the Go-Around switch. I've unintentionally engaged the Go-Around on both designs (767 and 777). It didn't happen on the 737 because the buttons are smaller and harder to move.
Maybe I'm a klutz but things get bumped.
misd-agin is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2019, 14:27
  #863 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Isla Grande
Posts: 997
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TOGA switches 767


gearlever is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2019, 17:07
  #864 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On the 767/757 I was told the go around switches were palm switches. Seemed to work for me.
IcePack is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2019, 09:48
  #865 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Uk
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually preferred them in that position to the 78 reach over and down, seemed easier to find .
Meester proach is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2019, 23:23
  #866 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NTSB Preliminary Report published

Says nothing that wasn't known within a week of the mishap. I'm a noob, so can't post the URL.
6PapaWhishey is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2019, 13:36
  #867 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Canada
Age: 40
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dark Knight
Re post 850 from a reliable source.

My thoughts.

Did not fly the 767 however, checking Captain Google images, the TOGA (Go Round) switches (as in most Boeings) are positioned such they require a premeditated, definite decision/action to trigger them.

I suggest it is almost impossible to do this when correctly selecting a flap reposition particularly should one have been properly trained: i.e. when selecting a flap reposition from the Left seat the hand always goes under the pilot flying (F/O's) arm. This prevents the Left seat pilot's arm getting in the way of the Pilot Flying (F/O) use of the thrust levers.
Further the hand/arm would not be anywhere near the TOGA switches.

Had for some reason TOGA had been initiated one would think autothrust would be immediately disconnected to maintain the required flight path/remain in control of the aircraft. Or is the required flight path was not able to be maintained a go round carried out.

This should be a fairly standard procedure which all training would demonstrate.

Where do you get these statements from? Who said there was a standard procedure for moving the flap lever? Just making this up? And also, how do you perform a go around at 6000 feet on a STAR? Do you know the definition of a Go-Around? On a Boeing, if you ever need to stop your descent on an arrival and need to climb back up, the easiest and smoothest way would be to set a higher altitude on the MCP and use Level Change. Unless you are about to hit something, you won't use TOGA at this point.

As far as hitting the TOGA switches accidentally, stranger things have happened, and it is possible.
Jumbo744 is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2019, 14:35
  #868 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Uk
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[QUOTE=6PapaWhishey;10454240]Says nothing that wasn't known within a week of the mishap. I'm a noob, so can't post the URL.[/QUO

Cant see anything new on NTSB site after March .
Meester proach is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2019, 14:55
  #869 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cant see anything new on NTSB site after March .
[/QUOTE]

Here's the text from the report:

" On February 23, 2019, at 1239 central standard time, Atlas Air flight 3591, a Boeing 767-375BCF, N1217A, entered a rapid descent from 6,000 ft and impacted a marshy bay area about 40 miles southeast of George Bush Intercontinental Airport (KIAH), Houston, Texas. The two pilots and one nonrevenue jumpseat pilot were fatally injured. The airplane was destroyed and highly fragmented. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 121 domestic cargo flight, which originated from Miami International Airport (KMIA), Miami, Florida, and was destined for KIAH."

The report can be found in the " Accident Synopses - by month" page of the NTSB site.
6PapaWhishey is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2019, 15:02
  #870 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here you go (it's more or less content-free): https://app.ntsb.gov/pdfgenerator/Re...=HTML&IType=MA
Paul852 is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2019, 15:14
  #871 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: London
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Paul852
Here you go (it's more or less content-free): https://app.ntsb.gov/pdfgenerator/Re...=HTML&IType=MA
That's not a "report". It's a piece of paper generated because someone felt they had to generate a piece of paper. No information after this long lends more weight to the rumours earlier in this thread.
PerPurumTonantes is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2019, 15:17
  #872 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: inmysuitcase
Posts: 209
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, we all knew that.
Nothing new.
Time for the ntsb to come up with some real investigating news!
testpanel is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2019, 16:12
  #873 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: the City by the Bay
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
https://ocw.mit.edu/ans7870/16/16.63...3JF12_A300.pdf

hitting the TOGA accidentally has resulted in crashes and near crashes before as in CI 140 Nagoya accident A300-600
armchairpilot94116 is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2019, 21:33
  #874 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,194
Received 388 Likes on 240 Posts
Originally Posted by testpanel
Time for the ntsb to come up with some real investigating news!
What's your hurry?
If they are being meticulous, and it takes time, where's the problem?
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2019, 21:46
  #875 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by armchairpilot94116
https://ocw.mit.edu/ans7870/16/16.63...3JF12_A300.pdf

hitting the TOGA accidentally has resulted in crashes and near crashes before as in CI 140 Nagoya accident A300-600

I don't recall TOGA being the precipitator. I do recall the screaming call as they fell in a stall of "power Power"

They hit the ground flat with little forward speed

The CI crash in Tapei was involved with too much power, precip a stall on a canceled approach
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2019, 21:53
  #876 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,194
Received 388 Likes on 240 Posts
loma, I know very little about 767: if one accidentally hits TOGA, can not then pull the power back by hand? (Or otherwise disengage it?)
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2019, 23:17
  #877 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Uk
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Lonewolf_50
loma, I know very little about 767: if one accidentally hits TOGA, can not then pull the power back by hand? (Or otherwise disengage it?)

Of course.
Meester proach is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2019, 00:36
  #878 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: North by Northwest
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by lomapaseo
I don't recall TOGA being the precipitator. I do recall the screaming call as they fell in a stall of "power Power"

They hit the ground flat with little forward speed

The CI crash in Tapei was involved with too much power, precip a stall on a canceled approach
VanderBurgh confirmed TOGA switch as precipitator in his video that includes runaway stab. You can choose to believe his information or not.
b1lanc is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2019, 01:36
  #879 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: the City by the Bay
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by lomapaseo
I don't recall TOGA being the precipitator. I do recall the screaming call as they fell in a stall of "power Power"

They hit the ground flat with little forward speed

The CI crash in Tapei was involved with too much power, precip a stall on a canceled approach
i was in Taipei when that one went down
will have to find the accident report
memory fades but remember they were a bit high on the approach and did late go around with full load sans the fuel burn from Bali and stalled at low altitude into apartments

pilot fatigue was mentioned as a big
factor Power applied too late for successful go around it seems or the AOA too high

the accident happened at night
armchairpilot94116 is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2019, 02:54
  #880 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,194
Received 388 Likes on 240 Posts
Originally Posted by Meester proach
Of course.
Thank you for that. Your response leaves me looking at the "leaked" info and more puzzled than before. The implication of that reported sequence is that once a mistaken hit of that switch, TOGA, the Left Seat pilot became inert, both physically and mentally.
I find that hard to believe, and so am quite keen to read the report when it comes out.
(My last areas of professional concentration before leaving aviation for other jobs was training, crew training, human performance, CRM, and human factors).

(Airbubba: I am in no way impugning your cred as a source - I've found your input to be generally solid over the years ... )
Lonewolf_50 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.