Atlas Air 767 down/Texas
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Are you saying that control column deflection was in fact an FDR parameter for the accident flight?
Having said that, I cannot say that the DFDR records this data.
Vertical acceleration
Vertical acceleration analysis I guess from the flightradar24 (or similar) data. Done a few days ago (27 Feb 2019) by Peter Lemme, satcom.guru. More than -1.5g. Quite a lot more seems likely. Presumably done by differentiating the altitude twice. Interesting discussion on Peter's page.
https://www.satcom.guru/2019/02/more...as-5y3591.html
[img]https://1.bp.********.com/-lrRaWb1ZZCM/XHdwq5__CwI/AAAAAAAAFaM/XUALij5OF-EVO9bzD9_iLB3fxibPhjuigCLcBGAs/s640/Screen%2BShot%2B2019-02-27%2Bat%2B9.24.24%2BPM.png(sic)
Last edited by jimjim1; 13th Mar 2019 at 01:30. Reason: fix the tiresome un-spottyblog-ness
I'm guessing something along the lines of the 737 rudder hardovers would move the column along with the elevators? So you'd need to know control force (or have other evidence) to rule it out?
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Zone of Alienation
Age: 79
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: FL 600. West of Mongolia
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes you would via the CVR Area Mic', and yes, crews DO have to go through security screening
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
§ 121.344 (d)(1):
(d) For all turbine-engine-powered transport category
(d) For all turbine-engine-powered transport category
airplanes that were manufactured after October 11, 1991 -
(1) The parameters listed in paragraph (a)(1) through (a)(34) of this section must be recorded within the ranges, accuracies, resolutions, and recording intervals specified in Appendix M of this part by August 20, 2001. Parameters listed in paragraphs (a)(12) through (a)(14) each may be recorded from a single source.
____________________
§ 121.344 (a)(12):
(12) Pitch control input;
(1) The parameters listed in paragraph (a)(1) through (a)(34) of this section must be recorded within the ranges, accuracies, resolutions, and recording intervals specified in Appendix M of this part by August 20, 2001. Parameters listed in paragraphs (a)(12) through (a)(14) each may be recorded from a single source.
____________________
§ 121.344 (a)(12):
(12) Pitch control input;
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/14/121.344
This is a fairly old 767. Does the FDR record column movements/positions, or are the FDR readings based on the position of the stabilizer/elevator.
Meaning if the stabilizer/elevator were moving, the columns actually may not be.
Apologies if this was asked/answered.
Meaning if the stabilizer/elevator were moving, the columns actually may not be.
Apologies if this was asked/answered.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
It should record both the pitch control input and the primary pitch control surface position according to the FAR I linked above.
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Zone of Alienation
Age: 79
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A thing called ‘startle factor’ is going to have played a huge role here, IMO. It doesn’t take but a bad instrument reading to precipitate an overwhelming, improper reaction.
Look up the CRJ200PF crash in Sweden from 2017. PF stopped watching instruments for a bit to do a briefing, when finished he looks back to the instruments and sees a 15 degree pitch up on the PFD attitude and practically instantly pushes column forward. PNF and standby instruments had normal pitch. Quick crosscheck would have most likely prevented that crash. But we are humans and are easily suprised/startled into action.
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Doonfoot, Ayr
Age: 70
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Turkish DC10 which crashed in France following explosive decompression used full power to near enough level off before getting shredded in a forest.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UTC +8
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is not even speculation, just a "scenario" that might fit that reported throttle and control-input reading.
Massive incapacitation of PF (bird through the windscreen, medical, other), body pitches forward onto both column and (hand) throttle levers. Nose-over forces make it impossible for the other pilot and jumpseater to clear the controls until too late (that possible last-second attempt to get the nose up).
EDIT: I see I'm not alone - but it would certainly require a "Black Swan" event.
Massive incapacitation of PF (bird through the windscreen, medical, other), body pitches forward onto both column and (hand) throttle levers. Nose-over forces make it impossible for the other pilot and jumpseater to clear the controls until too late (that possible last-second attempt to get the nose up).
EDIT: I see I'm not alone - but it would certainly require a "Black Swan" event.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree with Glueball that with a standard 5 point Boeing seat harness and in turbulence an incapacitated pilot would not be able to make any forward control input let alone the hefty sustained input required to override an autopilot and pitch down 45 degrees. My only suggestion (and this is pretty remote) would be that someone could have been adjusting his seat and in turbulence it slid forward and jammed the control column forward. I hope it does not turn out to be a nefarious act as it would increase a lot of already inappropriate security restrictions on pilots.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dublin
Age: 63
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by suninmyeyes
My only suggestion (and this is pretty remote) would be that someone could have been adjusting his seat and in turbulence it slid forward and jammed the control column forward
(See post #327 in this thread)
Dave.