Lawsuit alleges UAL cover-up of mid-air incident
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Balmullo,Scotland
Posts: 932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My question would simply be how does he know the torque values that he alleges were wrong and even if they were wrong how could that compromise the integrity of the glass?
It isnt frivolous - a significant event occurred that was not normal and the claimant states he suffered mental and physical injury
It isnt vexatious - as above, and in many countries courts apply it to litigants who repeatedly claim or continue to claim unreasonably. This is an initial claim with no evidence of previous claims
That still leaves the Courts to decide whether to make a judgement in his favour, or the defendants to decide they want to settle before a hearing....
It isnt vexatious - as above, and in many countries courts apply it to litigants who repeatedly claim or continue to claim unreasonably. This is an initial claim with no evidence of previous claims
That still leaves the Courts to decide whether to make a judgement in his favour, or the defendants to decide they want to settle before a hearing....
That sums it up pretty well IMHO.
That is quite possible
I have been commenting on the system. I think it unwise to make comments on the individual parties based on press reports and one document. That is for the Courts
I have been commenting on the system. I think it unwise to make comments on the individual parties based on press reports and one document. That is for the Courts