Air India B788 descends to 200 ft over water at HKG
Originally Posted by Act700
That’s why local ATC make a point to verbalise it, ManaAdaSystem!
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How do you local guys fly this ILS approach in minima weather? VS and if the GS suddenly dips down, you continue i VS? Or do you go around? 1 in 10 approaches end up with a go around?
This is an accident waiting to happen.
This is an accident waiting to happen.
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's quite likely the 747 lining up for departure is causing the GS distortion.
So you can't just "fix it", you need to adjust ATC procedures.
(I'm not sure about different antenna types though i believe there are types that are less prone to distortion)
See the following pictures looking at the 20th October at 22:13 UTC
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Possible, but I think this would have been looked into a long time ago.
ILS systems are flight tested on a regular basis. Don’t know the source for the NOTAM, pilot reports or test results?
ILS systems are flight tested on a regular basis. Don’t know the source for the NOTAM, pilot reports or test results?
Only half a speed-brake
1) Move the holding point before the U-turn, and introduce "Line up behind" [ICAO standard since long ago].
I was actually about to say a bit in defence of the crew, but seeing the graph by wiedehofp, now I am glad I did not.
I was actually about to say a bit in defence of the crew, but seeing the graph by wiedehofp, now I am glad I did not.
This is not an inherent problem with the GS equipment at VHHH. It is due to departing aircraft on the ground proceeding into the ILS Critical Area and interfering with the GS signal.
Clearly well-known to the authorities, since they have carefully painted an ILS HOLD line on taxiway K, abeam the GS antenna (see top image, post #43, and the airport diagram). And not uncommon at other airports.
If the ceiling is below 800' and/or visibility is below 2 miles, and an aircraft is on the ILS inside the OM, ATC should not permit an aircraft (or other vehicles) to pass that hold line. because it is well-known that that can make the GS reception unreliable.
However, on this day, the weather was well above those requirements, and ATC was not required to protect the GS signal.
Therefore it is up to landing crews, well-informed by charts, NOTAMs, and ATC verbal warnings that the GS could be unreliable as departing aircraft interrupt it periodically in good weather, to use common sense and not be automation-dependent. Use the ILS for guidance if you wish, but be prepared for a honking great 747F to pass in front of the antenna and foul up the GS signal. Be ready to hit the VS HOLD button, or cancel the A/P altogether and hand-fly the rest of the approach manually and visually.
Clearly well-known to the authorities, since they have carefully painted an ILS HOLD line on taxiway K, abeam the GS antenna (see top image, post #43, and the airport diagram). And not uncommon at other airports.
If the ceiling is below 800' and/or visibility is below 2 miles, and an aircraft is on the ILS inside the OM, ATC should not permit an aircraft (or other vehicles) to pass that hold line. because it is well-known that that can make the GS reception unreliable.
However, on this day, the weather was well above those requirements, and ATC was not required to protect the GS signal.
Therefore it is up to landing crews, well-informed by charts, NOTAMs, and ATC verbal warnings that the GS could be unreliable as departing aircraft interrupt it periodically in good weather, to use common sense and not be automation-dependent. Use the ILS for guidance if you wish, but be prepared for a honking great 747F to pass in front of the antenna and foul up the GS signal. Be ready to hit the VS HOLD button, or cancel the A/P altogether and hand-fly the rest of the approach manually and visually.
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is not an inherent problem with the GS equipment at VHHH. It is due to departing aircraft on the ground proceeding into the ILS Critical Area and interfering with the GS signal.
Clearly well-known to the authorities, since they have carefully painted an ILS HOLD line on taxiway K, abeam the GS antenna (see top image, post #43, and the airport diagram). And not uncommon at other airports.
If the ceiling is below 800' and/or visibility is below 2 miles, and an aircraft is on the ILS inside the OM, ATC should not permit an aircraft (or other vehicles) to pass that hold line. because it is well-known that that can make the GS reception unreliable.
However, on this day, the weather was well above those requirements, and ATC was not required to protect the GS signal.
Therefore it is up to landing crews, well-informed by charts, NOTAMs, and ATC verbal warnings that the GS could be unreliable as departing aircraft interrupt it periodically in good weather, to use common sense and not be automation-dependent. Use the ILS for guidance if you wish, but be prepared for a honking great 747F to pass in front of the antenna and foul up the GS signal. Be ready to hit the VS HOLD button, or cancel the A/P altogether and hand-fly the rest of the approach manually and visually.
Clearly well-known to the authorities, since they have carefully painted an ILS HOLD line on taxiway K, abeam the GS antenna (see top image, post #43, and the airport diagram). And not uncommon at other airports.
If the ceiling is below 800' and/or visibility is below 2 miles, and an aircraft is on the ILS inside the OM, ATC should not permit an aircraft (or other vehicles) to pass that hold line. because it is well-known that that can make the GS reception unreliable.
However, on this day, the weather was well above those requirements, and ATC was not required to protect the GS signal.
Therefore it is up to landing crews, well-informed by charts, NOTAMs, and ATC verbal warnings that the GS could be unreliable as departing aircraft interrupt it periodically in good weather, to use common sense and not be automation-dependent. Use the ILS for guidance if you wish, but be prepared for a honking great 747F to pass in front of the antenna and foul up the GS signal. Be ready to hit the VS HOLD button, or cancel the A/P altogether and hand-fly the rest of the approach manually and visually.
Then they will fix it.
Pegase Driver
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 74
Posts: 3,681
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Therefore it is up to landing crews, well-informed by charts, NOTAMs, and ATC verbal warnings that the GS could be unreliable as departing aircraft interrupt it periodically in good weather, to use common sense and not be automation-dependent. Use the ILS for guidance if you wish, but be prepared for a honking great 747F to pass in front of the antenna and foul up the GS signal. Be ready to hit the VS HOLD button, or cancel the A/P altogether and hand-fly the rest of the approach manually and visually.
If as you said , this only applies in good weather, then say " G/S unserviceable "during that period. You protect yourself as ATC and it is clear for all crews. Because if as ManaAdaSystem prediction above do materialize one day , the guys that authorized this will most likely end up somewhere very unpleasant. .
1. HK runs single runway ops overnight into the early morning. You can expect to land on 07R on certain days.
2. If the weather is good, ATC will not protect the ILS sensitive areas.
3. There is no need to fly an ILS in good weather, other approaches are available.
4. The GS fluctuations are reported via a Digital ATIS....you can get this outside of VHF coverage unlike other airports...so you can spend the 2-15hrs of your flight inbound coming up with a plan...there is no surprise here.
5. If you still choose to fly an ILS, you have accepted the risk, best have a plan if you encounter an aircraft upset event. Your decision.
6. If anything needs fixing in HK, it is the extremely inefficient airspace....particularly for arrivals from the north....and there is a 3rd runway under construction.
7. GS fluctuations during single runways ops in the late night period in VMC is a minor issue easily managed by experienced crew....ie don't fly the ILS!
2. If the weather is good, ATC will not protect the ILS sensitive areas.
3. There is no need to fly an ILS in good weather, other approaches are available.
4. The GS fluctuations are reported via a Digital ATIS....you can get this outside of VHF coverage unlike other airports...so you can spend the 2-15hrs of your flight inbound coming up with a plan...there is no surprise here.
5. If you still choose to fly an ILS, you have accepted the risk, best have a plan if you encounter an aircraft upset event. Your decision.
6. If anything needs fixing in HK, it is the extremely inefficient airspace....particularly for arrivals from the north....and there is a 3rd runway under construction.
7. GS fluctuations during single runways ops in the late night period in VMC is a minor issue easily managed by experienced crew....ie don't fly the ILS!
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Back of Beyond
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Indeed, if the instructions above are too hard to follow, then maybe flying isn't for you and you should consider another career choice.
It's not that bloody difficult snowflakes.
It's not that bloody difficult snowflakes.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Surrounded by aluminum, and the great outdoors
Posts: 3,780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Only half a speed-brake
Does the fluctuation, in anyone's opinion, explain what we see on the profile as recorded on FR24? I experienced some G/S fluctuations at SVO for the very same reason of GP antenna shielding, but the overall effect was very different.
The second approach, just starting the final descent
Same position but on the first approach. Already well below profile, -2000 fpm and keeps descending
First approach, 5 miles out: 400 ft AFE and still -2000 fpm
And the correction is … creepy.
The second approach, just starting the final descent
Same position but on the first approach. Already well below profile, -2000 fpm and keeps descending
First approach, 5 miles out: 400 ft AFE and still -2000 fpm
And the correction is … creepy.
Last edited by FlightDetent; 9th Dec 2018 at 08:49.
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fluctuating ILS glidepath signals are not uncommon. Usually always caused by large lumps of metal (ie aircraft on the ground) moving between you and the transmitter. I’ve seen it at VHHH, KLAX & YSSY. In all cases it has been in VMC and ATC therefore are not required to protect the ILS signals. Pilots are expected to use airmanship and commonsense. Call me old fashioned, but when it has happened to me I (shock, horror) disconnected the autopilot, looked out the window and hand flew a visual approach.
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: here and there
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
GS fluctuating.
A wise man (Murphy?)once said , “ If something can go wrong , it will” . Knowing that there’s a deficiency in the system and “hoping” the end user will be able to hack it is OK in some industries but not in aviation IMHO.
As boeing have recently found out with their MCAS , don’t make a hole in the cheese and cover it up with tape , someone’s gonna find a way to line up the holes 😳😳
masalama👍👍
As boeing have recently found out with their MCAS , don’t make a hole in the cheese and cover it up with tape , someone’s gonna find a way to line up the holes 😳😳
masalama👍👍
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A wise man (Murphy?)once said , “ If something can go wrong , it will” . Knowing that there’s a deficiency in the system and “hoping” the end user will be able to hack it is OK in some industries but not in aviation IMHO.
As boeing have recently found out with their MCAS , don’t make a hole in the cheese and cover it up with tape , someone’s gonna find a way to line up the holes 😳😳
masalama👍👍
As boeing have recently found out with their MCAS , don’t make a hole in the cheese and cover it up with tape , someone’s gonna find a way to line up the holes 😳😳
masalama👍👍
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: US
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1. HK runs single runway ops overnight into the early morning. You can expect to land on 07R on certain days.
2. If the weather is good, ATC will not protect the ILS sensitive areas.
3. There is no need to fly an ILS in good weather, other approaches are available.
4. The GS fluctuations are reported via a Digital ATIS....you can get this outside of VHF coverage unlike other airports...so you can spend the 2-15hrs of your flight inbound coming up with a plan...there is no surprise here.
5. If you still choose to fly an ILS, you have accepted the risk, best have a plan if you encounter an aircraft upset event. Your decision.
6. If anything needs fixing in HK, it is the extremely inefficient airspace....particularly for arrivals from the north....and there is a 3rd runway under construction.
7. GS fluctuations during single runways ops in the late night period in VMC is a minor issue easily managed by experienced crew....ie don't fly the ILS!
2. If the weather is good, ATC will not protect the ILS sensitive areas.
3. There is no need to fly an ILS in good weather, other approaches are available.
4. The GS fluctuations are reported via a Digital ATIS....you can get this outside of VHF coverage unlike other airports...so you can spend the 2-15hrs of your flight inbound coming up with a plan...there is no surprise here.
5. If you still choose to fly an ILS, you have accepted the risk, best have a plan if you encounter an aircraft upset event. Your decision.
6. If anything needs fixing in HK, it is the extremely inefficient airspace....particularly for arrivals from the north....and there is a 3rd runway under construction.
7. GS fluctuations during single runways ops in the late night period in VMC is a minor issue easily managed by experienced crew....ie don't fly the ILS!
Glide slope blanking by aircraft taking the runway is common. As is LOC fluctuations as a plane clears the runway. This isn't new.
Are those sink rates and altitudes correct? 2,600 FPM at 1350'? 1,900 FPM at 525'? Who's minded the store?
If the ILS signal, or autopilot, gets twitchy it's taken out of the loop ASAP.
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
During my career my company required we fly the ILS, if the runway had one. We often didn't couple. Hand flying works quite nicely, or at least it used to. And, there are no other approaches to 7R unless you are RNP AR qualified.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
Age: 79
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It can't be "fixed" if it is a taxiing airplane blocking the GS transmitter during good weather