Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Frontier Airbus "blasted" engine...!?

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Frontier Airbus "blasted" engine...!?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Nov 2018, 17:05
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Southern Shores of Lusitania Kingdom
Age: 53
Posts: 858
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Frontier Airbus "blasted" engine...!?

An amazing picture indeed...some hours ago between Tampa and Vegas

https://twitter.com/DanPonceTV?fbcli...pnkjRjYiEu9eRI

JanetFlight is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2018, 17:10
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: ._..._...
Posts: 312
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can't be good for the airflow
vee1-rotate is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2018, 17:16
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: PA
Age: 59
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Doesnt look as dramatic when on the ground. I think they just took delivery of this ac on Oct 29.....oops that is 2016, not 2018...

underfire is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2018, 17:19
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It was Frontier 260 LAS-TPA with a nice view of Sloan Canyon.
Airbubba is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2018, 17:20
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: PA
Age: 59
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LAS VEGAS (KSNV) — A Frontier flight from Las Vegas to Tampa, Florida, had to return to the airport after an engine cover came off of the aircraft, according to an airline spokesperson.

Frontier Flight 260 took off from McCarran International Airport with a scheduled 7 a.m. departure time, but it had to return for an "engine concern," said Christine Crews with Clark County Aviation.

The flight landed back at McCarran just after 7:25 a.m. with no reports of injuries. Crews said 166 people were on board the plane, an Airbus A320.
Frontier's website listed the flight as canceled, with an originally scheduled arrival time of 2:17 EST at Tampa International Airport.
In a statement, Frontier said a cowling, or engine cover, came loose and pilots immediately returned to McCarran.

"The engine continued to operate normally and the aircraft, an Airbus 320, landed safely," the statement reads. "Safety is our top priority at Frontier Airlines and we would like to acknowledge the professionalism of our pilots and flight attendants. We are working to get our passengers to their destinations as quickly as possible.”
underfire is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2018, 17:21
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
A320 (CFM), first flight of the day after a nightstop ...

Airborne barely 15 minutes.

Oh dear.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2018, 18:37
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South East
Age: 54
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
30 years of issues on both CEO engine types and still no re-design. Hopefully its different on the NEO?
Alwaysairbus is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2018, 18:49
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,407
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
Are those witness marks on the leading edge of the sharklet? Or is it simply a reflection or part of the paint scheme?
I wouldn't expect engine bits to get that far outboard, but sometimes the airflow does funny things.
tdracer is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2018, 19:01
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: WA STATE
Age: 78
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tdracer
Are those witness marks on the leading edge of the sharklet? Or is it simply a reflection or part of the paint scheme?
I wouldn't expect engine bits to get that far outboard, but sometimes the airflow does funny things.
Looks like a pic of a BROWN BEAR - either part of a paint scheme on body or on sharklet - unless it was a reflection of a "passenger " looking out a window

lower " mark" appears to be a nav light

upper paint leading edge on sharklet may just be ' wear' under magnification

Last edited by CONSO; 30th Nov 2018 at 19:06. Reason: better desciption
CONSO is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2018, 19:10
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Say "hi" to Grizwald the bear.

DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2018, 19:16
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Edinburgh
Age: 64
Posts: 48
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
A wee bit different from the usual fan cowl issues, in as much as the two reverser C-ducts have lifted......
clarkieboy is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2018, 19:41
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Originally Posted by clarkieboy
A wee bit different from the usual fan cowl issues, in as much as the two reverser C-ducts have lifted......
The fan cowl door on the CFM56 overlaps the thrust reverser door by an inch or two, so if it was the reverser doors that opened first they would likely take the fan cowl doors with them.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2018, 19:48
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
Age: 79
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Either way its a double dose of carelessness, once by mtce not securing it properly and again by the crew not checking properly during the walkaround. These incidents keep happening despite regular warnings to inspect the fixings before flight.
The Ancient Geek is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2018, 20:25
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Watford
Age: 70
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A320's have a long history of this....how long before it causes fatalities?
WOTME? is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2018, 21:03
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Edinburgh
Age: 64
Posts: 48
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
The fan cowl door on the CFM56 overlaps the thrust reverser door by an inch or two, so if it was the reverser doors that opened first they would likely take the fan cowl doors with them.
Aye, they do. God knows I’ve opened, and shut properly, a few. I doubt this time the C-ducts were not latched, can’t tell from the pictures if the fan was or not. Guessing from the lack of fan cowl bottoms, probably was latched.
clarkieboy is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2018, 21:15
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by clarkieboy
A wee bit different from the usual fan cowl issues, in as much as the two reverser C-ducts have lifted......
A far more serious event with a lot more drag and no fire suppression
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2018, 21:23
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: In a Pineapple Under the Sea
Age: 61
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by underfire
Doesnt look as dramatic when on the ground. I think they just took delivery of this ac on Oct 29.....oops that is 2016, not 2018...
Grizwald was delivered October of 2014 . . .


WillFlyForCheese is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2018, 21:28
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Originally Posted by clarkieboy
I doubt this time the C-ducts were not latched, can’t tell from the pictures if the fan was or not. Guessing from the lack of fan cowl bottoms, probably was latched.
So if both the reverser doors and fan cowls were correctly latched, WTF happened ?
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2018, 22:30
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Edinburgh
Age: 64
Posts: 48
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
So if both the reverser doors and fan cowls were correctly latched, WTF happened ?
Sorry, my bad English. Just remembered why I read but don’t write.
In my humble opinion the C-ducts were not latched correctly, and I am not sure if the fan cowls were. However, if I was to venture a guess, I think they were latched correctly. This is only my opinion, and purely based on working on 320s for 20 years. Back to reading for Iain.
clarkieboy is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2018, 23:20
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Stratosphere
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did they land with slats extended or retracted?
Seems like the damage would interfere with the extended slats.
MartinAOA is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.