Air Niugini Aircraft crash, Truk Lagoon
Longtimelurker
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: killington Vt
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Folks,
Re. my previous post, "Allan" was/is Adam.
His own description of his post crash actions is very modest, compared to other passenger's descriptions of his vital contribution.
Tootle pip!!
Re. my previous post, "Allan" was/is Adam.
His own description of his post crash actions is very modest, compared to other passenger's descriptions of his vital contribution.
Tootle pip!!
It's pretty clear from this passenger account that it was an overshoot and the tail hit the end of the runway before taking a permanent dip in the lagoon.
https://www.thenational.com.pg/air-n...how-he-helped/
https://www.thenational.com.pg/air-n...how-he-helped/
After all this time, nobody can tell if it was 130kt into the water at the approach end, or 60kt off the far end after a bounce and a skid?
Had reverse thrust been armed/selected?
Had the "pilots" bounced and tried for a go-around?
Where are the answers?
Had reverse thrust been armed/selected?
Had the "pilots" bounced and tried for a go-around?
Where are the answers?
Extract from a post on the US 7th Fleet website - my bold:
U.S. Navy UCT 2 Renders Assistance Following Plane Crash in Chuuk > Commander, U.S. 7th Fleet > Display
Flight PX56 crashed approximately a quarter mile short of the runway, near where UCT 2 was conducting operations. The Sailors assisted local authorities by shuttling passengers and crew to shore using their inflatable boat prior to the plane sinking in approximately 100 feet of water. UCT 2’s embedded Chief hospital corpsman provided medical attention to at least one passenger who sustained minor injuries.
If there were military eyewitnesses who saw the aircraft enter the water, that would be strong evidence of an undershoot.
But the report doesn't mention that, only what the Seabees did in the aftermath.
They also got the flight number wrong, though that's by the by.
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Europe
Age: 73
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I refer to my post on page 3. I've since been away for a week and on my return find we're now on page 11 and still not agreed on whether it was an undershoot or overshoot!
Have you seen any such evidence yet ?
It was an overshoot. The tail hit the end of the runway before splashing down in the lagoon.
https://www.thenational.com.pg/air-n...how-he-helped/
https://www.thenational.com.pg/air-n...how-he-helped/
Right! According to one passenger.
Ask the other 30 passengers what happened and you’ll get another 30 version of events!
I particularly liked this bit... ‘The pilot turned the plane quickly and crash landed on the water.‘
Ask the other 30 passengers what happened and you’ll get another 30 version of events!
I particularly liked this bit... ‘The pilot turned the plane quickly and crash landed on the water.‘
And he replied '...sure...'.
Journalists love to put their own ideas and preconceptions into the words of their interviewees.
And don't miss the part where he made sure to get his bag with him aswell.